Author Topic: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1  (Read 21163 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline EdStroud

  • Posts: 10139
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #750: May 10, 2010, 09:55:06 PM »
Where is preston wilson
hopefully under the asteroid

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #751: May 10, 2010, 09:55:08 PM »
We should sign Jayson Werth now!

Offline JMUalumni

  • Posts: 7789
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #752: May 10, 2010, 09:55:49 PM »
Ouch Desmond. I would say put him in the 2 hole but Kennedy is doing fairly well there, then again Kennedy does well in the 7th hole.

Kennedy has been working the count well at least in the two spot.  He has seen 20 pitches in 4 at-bats tonight with two walks.  Desmond has seen 13 and 4 of those were an intentional walk.

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #753: May 10, 2010, 09:55:50 PM »
That looked good...

Offline cmdterps44

  • Posts: 15537
  • Future
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #754: May 10, 2010, 09:55:58 PM »
OOOH Baby... Meat...

eh, use your imagination. it sounds sexual.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93629
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #755: May 10, 2010, 09:56:04 PM »
AlGo making an appearance :clap:

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #756: May 10, 2010, 09:56:17 PM »
Now we don't have Dunn or Willingham.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 67112
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #757: May 10, 2010, 09:56:18 PM »
hopefully under the asteroid

That is so freaked up. 


Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23268
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #758: May 10, 2010, 09:56:27 PM »
Kennedy has been working the count well at least in the two spot.  He has seen 20 pitches in 4 at-bats tonight with two walks.

He should always be there when we're facing a righty, IMO.

Offline KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 15454
  • Nats RP have no nerve
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #759: May 10, 2010, 09:56:28 PM »
EdStroud's avatar :clap:

Is that a reference to something Nats-related or did you just want to pay homage to Neidhart?

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37378
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #760: May 10, 2010, 09:56:29 PM »
lol weekend at bernies

Offline Evolution33

  • Posts: 5093
    • Blown Save, Win
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #761: May 10, 2010, 09:56:29 PM »
This is a bad game for clip and capps to be getting a rest

Offline JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 24444
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #762: May 10, 2010, 09:56:42 PM »
89% win probability  entering the inning.

Offline cmdterps44

  • Posts: 15537
  • Future
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #763: May 10, 2010, 09:56:44 PM »
Now we don't have Dunn or Willingham.

We do have the fastest team though!

Offline shoeshineboy

  • Posts: 7874
  • Walks Kill!! Walks Kill! Walks Kill!!!!
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #764: May 10, 2010, 09:56:50 PM »
i'm just simply stating pudge is much better than nieves.

nieves/bernadina should be in AAA right now.  bring back coste or flores ... i don't care if they haven't rehabbed.

Apples and oranges. Bernadina is a kid trying to make it as legit position player and showing he is a career minor leaguer. Nieves is a fundamentally sound defensive backup catcher who is able to be productive despite playing about once a week and batting 8th in the order. He has 39 at bats on the season. Yet, because he is a decent contact/situational hitter, with RISP he is .400/.400/.500/.900  and with men on base he is .294/.294/.353/.647. It'd be great to have any number of current starting catchers as our backup. But as pure backups go - the guys you want to be able to play good defense and hit for contact out of the 8th hole and hope they bat .250 - Wil does a good a job.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 67112
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #765: May 10, 2010, 09:57:09 PM »
Pudge should be out there catching with the Silver Wig on.

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 30621
  • it's a thumb
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #766: May 10, 2010, 09:57:12 PM »
AlGo making an appearance :clap:

[hammonds] AAAAlbAAAArto GAAAAnzAAAAlAAAAz [/hammonds]

Offline Evolution33

  • Posts: 5093
    • Blown Save, Win
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #767: May 10, 2010, 09:57:29 PM »
89% win probability  entering the inning.

Means nothing

Offline natsfan4evr

  • Posts: 6171
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #768: May 10, 2010, 09:57:51 PM »
Who's going to come in the 9th? Batista?

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37378
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #769: May 10, 2010, 09:58:07 PM »
[hammonds] AAAAlbAAAArto GAAAAnzAAAAlAAAAz [/hammonds]

that's not how you spell it.

Offline JMUalumni

  • Posts: 7789
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #770: May 10, 2010, 09:58:13 PM »
Pudge should be out there catching with the Silver Wig on.

He should just have it spray painted on his catcher's mask.

Offline JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 24444
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #771: May 10, 2010, 09:58:15 PM »

Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23268
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #772: May 10, 2010, 09:58:22 PM »
Walker's whoopin'.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 67112
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #773: May 10, 2010, 09:58:26 PM »
89% win probability  entering the inning.

PC: "I'm concerned about the 11%"  :lol:

Offline cmdterps44

  • Posts: 15537
  • Future
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #774: May 10, 2010, 09:58:28 PM »
[hammonds] AAAAlbAAAArto GAAAAnzAAAAlAAAAz [/hammonds]

That's alot of As for a name.

Albarto Ganzalaz