Author Topic: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 2  (Read 3663 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37347
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 2
« Reply #125: May 01, 2010, 07:59:30 PM »
made your own bed craig stammen ... can't freakin go soft against the opposing pitcher.

Offline Potomac Cannons

  • Posts: 3279
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 2
« Reply #126: May 01, 2010, 07:59:33 PM »
If we're in it around the all-star break, I could see us making a move, otherwise, it looks like we're riding it out and will be making a bid at one of the big FA's on the market.

Right, two pitchers and a prospect for a RF or just wait and go after Werth/Crawford in the offseason.

Offline Kevrock

  • Posts: 10893
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 2
« Reply #127: May 01, 2010, 07:59:58 PM »
Way to stand there and watch a double Hanley you freaking bum. He should have been on third.

Offline PC

  • Posts: 39868
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 2
« Reply #128: May 01, 2010, 08:00:14 PM »
SCORE!!!

Online Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 33586
  • Lets go to work
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 2
« Reply #129: May 01, 2010, 08:00:22 PM »
Lets go Kennedy.

Punish Volsted for running the bases!

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37347
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 2
« Reply #130: May 01, 2010, 08:01:47 PM »
Right, two pitchers and a prospect for a RF or just wait and go after Werth/Crawford in the offseason.

eh, if we're in contending position and our RF position still is shaky, we better go out and get a star RF.  talk about LAC. 

Online Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 33586
  • Lets go to work
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 2
« Reply #131: May 01, 2010, 08:02:29 PM »
eh, if we're in contending position and our RF position still is shaky, we better go out and get a star RF.  talk about LAC. 

Depends... no need to give up good prospects for a year or two of a guy when you could wait till the offseason and get a guy for 4-5 years and give up no prospects.

Offline Potomac Cannons

  • Posts: 3279
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 2
« Reply #132: May 01, 2010, 08:02:47 PM »
bernadina with a slow comebacker to the mound ... the dude has one hit on the year.  :hang:

He's got 7 f'n ABs.  Settle down SF/AC Jr.

Online DPMOmaha

  • Posts: 17900
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 2
« Reply #133: May 01, 2010, 08:03:58 PM »
That ball was gone in  29 out of 30 parks.
28 out of 30.  It doesn't go in Houston either.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37347
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 2
« Reply #134: May 01, 2010, 08:04:08 PM »
He's got 7 f'n ABs.  Settle down SF/AC Jr.

dude you're still in newb category ... i'm the opposite of SF.  And that's SF's boy by the way.

Offline nats2playoffs

  • Posts: 17696
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 2
« Reply #135: May 01, 2010, 08:04:16 PM »
If we're in it around the all-star break, I could see us making a move, otherwise, it looks like we're riding it out and will be making a bid at one of the big FA's on the market.


If we take and remain in 1st place, I'll bet we make a deal with Jermaine Dye, who is sitting out as a free agent.  The Nationals had talked to him earlier, but he wanted more money. [LAC]

"Dye is still taking a hard line on what it will take for him to play. "I'm not going to a bad team, and I'm not playing for $1.5 million," Dye said."

         H/AB       R     HR   RBI   SB  AVG
2009: 126/503   78   27   81   0   .250   

Nationals  1
Marlins     1

Online Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 33586
  • Lets go to work
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 2
« Reply #136: May 01, 2010, 08:04:33 PM »
Zimm is not healthy.

Offline Potomac Cannons

  • Posts: 3279
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 2
« Reply #137: May 01, 2010, 08:05:43 PM »
dude you're still in newb category ... i'm the opposite of SF.  And that's SF's boy by the way.

Overreacting to every single thing isn't the opposite of SF.  Going crazy about a guy going 1-7 when he's coming off of a leg injury from last year, had a good spring, and had a hot start at AAA is SF in a nutshell.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37347
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 2
« Reply #138: May 01, 2010, 08:05:56 PM »

Offline Potomac Cannons

  • Posts: 3279
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 2
« Reply #139: May 01, 2010, 08:06:37 PM »
If we take and remain in 1st place, I'll bet we make a deal with Jermaine Dye, who is sitting out as a free agent.  The Nationals had talked to him earlier, but he wanted more money. [LAC]

Why would we make the RF situation worse by removing defense and not adding offense?

Online Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 33586
  • Lets go to work
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 2
« Reply #140: May 01, 2010, 08:06:50 PM »
Dibble must have something against Mantei.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37347
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 2
« Reply #141: May 01, 2010, 08:06:56 PM »
Overreacting to every single thing isn't the opposite of SF.  Going crazy about a guy going 1-7 when he's coming off of a leg injury from last year, had a good spring, and had a hot start at AAA is SF in a nutshell.

:doh: you just don't understand ... i'm giving SFAC crap.

but i still don't like our RF situation at all.  it's pathetic.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37347
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 2
« Reply #142: May 01, 2010, 08:08:02 PM »
Why would we make the RF situation worse by removing defense and not adding offense?

yeah our combined RF'ers are batting worse than .180, there's no offense in the first place.  but i agree his glove is very questionable. 

Offline EdStroud

  • Posts: 8758
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 2
« Reply #143: May 01, 2010, 08:10:28 PM »
..............'bout time

Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23222
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 2
« Reply #144: May 01, 2010, 08:10:28 PM »
Why would we make the RF situation worse by removing defense and not adding offense?

His second half sucked last year, but he hit very well in the first half (20+ homers and a .930+ OPS, I believe). A Dye/Harris platoon would be pretty nice, IMO.

Online Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 33586
  • Lets go to work
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 2
« Reply #145: May 01, 2010, 08:10:29 PM »
Nice pitch... even though it wasn't intentional.

Offline Kevrock

  • Posts: 10893
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 2
« Reply #146: May 01, 2010, 08:10:33 PM »
LOL Dibble, "Nice pitch"

I do agree though.

Offline PC

  • Posts: 39868
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 2
« Reply #147: May 01, 2010, 08:10:47 PM »
Remember that Craig, the next time you play Philadelphia!

Online Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 33586
  • Lets go to work
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 2
« Reply #148: May 01, 2010, 08:11:33 PM »
His second half sucked last year, but he hit very well in the first half (20+ homers and a .900+ OPS). A Dye/Harris platoon would be pretty nice, IMO.

We already have one DH on the team... don't need another.

Plus, Dye already acted like a nag because he didn't want to play for a 'loser'.

freak him, we don't need him now... don't need him when we're good either.

Offline Potomac Cannons

  • Posts: 3279
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 2
« Reply #149: May 01, 2010, 08:11:35 PM »
We simply cannot remove Stammen from the rotation and keep Lannan there when moves are made in late May/June.