Author Topic: NFL Thread (2010-11)  (Read 39626 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 66835
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
NFL Thread (2010-11)
« Topic Start: March 05, 2010, 06:32:15 PM »
NFL Index:

2008-09 - http://www.wnff.net/index.php?topic=9418.0
2009-10 - http://www.wnff.net/index.php?topic=12580.0
2010-11 - http://www.wnff.net/index.php?topic=16900.0
2011-12 - http://www.wnff.net/index.php?topic=22193.0
2012-13 - http://www.wnff.net/index.php?topic=25825.0
2013-14 - http://www.wnff.net/index.php?topic=28567.0
2014-15 - http://www.wnff.net/index.php?topic=30563.0
2015-16 - http://www.wnff.net/index.php?topic=32205.0
2016-17 - http://www.wnff.net/index.php?topic=33665.0
2017-18 - http://www.wnff.net/index.php?topic=34921.0



Now that free agency has begun this thread is for the NFL 2010 season at large.

Julius Peppers and Chester Taylor to Chicago.

Roethlisberger is facing a fresh sexual assault allegation, this time it happened in Georgia. UMD will probably go nuclear over this.

Offline UMDNats

  • Posts: 13474
Re: NFL Thread (2010)
« Reply #1: March 05, 2010, 07:08:26 PM »
I vaguely heard about the sexual assault charge. My sister knows a chick who went to Miami with him and she said he's a sleeze. Hopefully it's nothing serious.

You hate to see two separate sex-related charges in like one year, though. even if one was baloney.

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: NFL Thread (2010)
« Reply #2: March 05, 2010, 07:15:26 PM »
I vaguely heard about the sexual assault charge. My sister knows a chick who went to Miami with him and she said he's a sleeze.

What does that say about a "chick", who went away with him for a free trip to Miami?

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 18592
Re: NFL Thread (2010)
« Reply #3: March 05, 2010, 07:18:44 PM »
Has it been proven one was baloney? Just because the first woman was a nut doesn't mean she wasn't assaulted

Offline UMDNats

  • Posts: 13474
Re: NFL Thread (2010)
« Reply #4: March 05, 2010, 07:23:21 PM »
What does that say about a "chick", who went away with him for a free trip to Miami?

No, dude, I mean Miami University, where he went to college.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 66835
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: NFL Thread (2010)
« Reply #5: March 05, 2010, 07:45:51 PM »
My sister knows a chick who went to Miami with him and she said he's a sleeze.


I met a chick once who made a similar claim. She went to the same college and said the same thing your sister's friend said. But who knows if she was just talking to be talking. I don't understand this "sexual assault" thing. If a chick doesn't want to bang you then why would you go to that length? If a chick even as much as hesitates I no longer want to bang her, even if she changed her mind I wouldn't bang her.

Offline JMW IV

  • Posts: 11322
  • Name on the Front > Name on The Back
Re: NFL Thread (2010)
« Reply #6: March 05, 2010, 07:56:03 PM »
you are full of crap spider.

if she changed her mind and got nekkid, you would hit it. stop fronting.

Offline UMDNats

  • Posts: 13474
Re: NFL Thread (2010)
« Reply #7: March 05, 2010, 07:59:08 PM »
apparently the chick isn't even sure it's roethlisberger?

Offline JMW IV

  • Posts: 11322
  • Name on the Front > Name on The Back
Re: NFL Thread (2010)
« Reply #8: March 05, 2010, 08:00:19 PM »
anquan boldin to the Ravens for a 5th rounder.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 66835
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: NFL Thread (2010)
« Reply #9: March 05, 2010, 08:03:33 PM »
you are full of crap spider.

if she changed her mind and got nekkid, you would hit it. stop fronting.

My bad. Since you know me better than I know myself I should've checked with you to determine whether I would do such a thing.

Offline Nathan

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 10724
  • Wow. Such warnings. Very baseball. Moderator Doge.
Re: NFL Thread (2010)
« Reply #10: March 05, 2010, 08:04:26 PM »
anquan boldin to the Ravens for a 5th rounder.
Steal.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 66835
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: NFL Thread (2010)
« Reply #11: March 05, 2010, 08:05:51 PM »
apparently the chick isn't even sure it's roethlisberger?

Where did you read that? I heard a report that his agent said he was out with some friends (don't know if there were teammates) and a few broads and that he (Roethlisberger) was questioned by the cops. No charges have been filed yet.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 66835
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: NFL Thread (2010)
« Reply #12: March 05, 2010, 08:06:46 PM »
Steal.

I thought the deal was Boldin and a 5th rounder from the Cardinals for a 3rd and a 4th from the Ravens. Either way it's a steal, IMO.

Offline UMDNats

  • Posts: 13474
Re: NFL Thread (2010)
« Reply #13: March 05, 2010, 08:07:28 PM »
Where did you read that? I heard a report that his agent said he was out with some friends (don't know if there were teammates) and a few broads and that he (Roethlisberger) was questioned by the cops. No charges have been filed yet.

the AP story said he was with a group and she thinks it may have been him or something. sounds fishy to me but whaever.

and i thought boldin was traded  for a 3rd and 4th

but yes a steal

Offline Nathan

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 10724
  • Wow. Such warnings. Very baseball. Moderator Doge.
Re: NFL Thread (2010)
« Reply #14: March 05, 2010, 08:07:52 PM »
anquan boldin to the Ravens for a 5th rounder.
Actually, the Sun says the Ravens gave their 3rd and 4th round picks for Boldin and the Card's 5th.  Not as much a steal.

Offline JMW IV

  • Posts: 11322
  • Name on the Front > Name on The Back
Re: NFL Thread (2010)
« Reply #15: March 05, 2010, 08:09:01 PM »
I knew that trade sounded  like too much of a ripoff

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 66835
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: NFL Thread (2010)
« Reply #16: March 05, 2010, 08:13:10 PM »
Actually, the Sun says the Ravens gave their 3rd and 4th round picks for Boldin and the Card's 5th.  Not as much a steal.

I still see this as a bargain for the Ravens, especially since it addresses a position of dire need.

the AP story said he was with a group and she thinks it may have been him or something. sounds fishy to me but whaever.


We're going to need more information on this. The first I heard it was said "sexual assault" and then they said "sexual manipulation". That could easily mean as little as someone grabbed her ass or maybe even copped a boob feel and she decided that was enough to warrant a quick accusation that may end up netting her an easy financial settlement.

Offline UMDNats

  • Posts: 13474
Re: NFL Thread (2010)
« Reply #17: March 05, 2010, 08:14:34 PM »
She probably just wants some cash.

Offline Nathan

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 10724
  • Wow. Such warnings. Very baseball. Moderator Doge.
Re: NFL Thread (2010)
« Reply #18: March 05, 2010, 08:14:55 PM »
I still see this as a bargain for the Ravens, especially since it addresses a position of dire need.

And he signed a 3 year, $25MM extension with the Ravens.

Offline blue911

  • Posts: 17608
Re: NFL Thread (2010)
« Reply #19: March 06, 2010, 09:27:33 AM »
Isn't this Roethlisberger's third strike under the Goodell system?

 

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 66835
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: NFL Thread (2010)
« Reply #20: March 06, 2010, 09:31:51 AM »
Isn't this Roethlisberger's third strike under the Goodell system?

 


UMD: This isn't baseball so WTF are you talking about "Big Ben" having three strikes!   :evil:  

Anyway, I thought this would constitute his second. Maybe I'm forgetting an incident from the past. Does the motorcycle incident count against him?

Offline blue911

  • Posts: 17608
Re: NFL Thread (2010)
« Reply #21: March 06, 2010, 09:33:40 AM »

UMD: This isn't baseball so WTF are you talking about "Big Ben" having three strikes!   :evil: 

Anyway, I thought this would constitute his second. Maybe I'm forgetting an incident from the past. Does the motorcycle incident count against him?

Yeah, no license. I think the Sheriff is still smarting from the Williams defeat, Big Ben may get the chair.

Offline PatsNats28

  • Posts: 8456
Re: NFL Thread (2010)
« Reply #22: March 06, 2010, 11:14:51 AM »
Isn't this Roethlisberger's third strike under the Goodell system?

 

Roethlisberger gets four strikes because he's white :stir:

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 18592
Re: NFL Thread (2010)
« Reply #23: March 06, 2010, 11:15:49 AM »
Roethlisberger gets four strikes because he's white :stir:


Don't forget matt jones- I think you have to be a white qb to qualify for the extra strike

Offline PatsNats28

  • Posts: 8456
Re: NFL Thread (2010)
« Reply #24: March 06, 2010, 11:16:49 AM »


Don't forget matt jones- I think you have to be a white qb to qualify for the extra strike

He was a former white QB (at Arkansas)

Four strikes if you're white and you're famous.