Author Topic: Nationals @ Reds, Game 4  (Read 3891 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online sportsfan882

  • Posts: 82741
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 4
« Reply #125: August 16, 2009, 02:57:02 PM »
game over. stupid freaks.

SUICIDE SQUEEZE?!!!! ARE YOU KIDDING ME

Offline EdStroud

  • Posts: 8659
  • My B-Day?
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 4
« Reply #126: August 16, 2009, 02:57:14 PM »
why not a safety squeeze?

Offline JMW IV

  • Posts: 11254
  • Name on the Front > Name on The Back
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 4
« Reply #127: August 16, 2009, 02:57:26 PM »
Gonzalez sucks.

why the squeeze play..with willingham running?

bad decision, Riggles. very, very bad decision.

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 29995
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 4
« Reply #128: August 16, 2009, 02:57:35 PM »
WTF AG?

Online sportsfan882

  • Posts: 82741
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 4
« Reply #129: August 16, 2009, 02:57:44 PM »
why not a safety squeeze?
Why not just have him try to hit a fly ball?

Holy crap. Riggleman is clueless. No way in any scenario should he be the manager next year.

Online sportsfan882

  • Posts: 82741
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 4
« Reply #130: August 16, 2009, 02:58:14 PM »
BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!

Runner on third with 0 outs and the get nothing.

Only the Nats.

Offline JMW IV

  • Posts: 11254
  • Name on the Front > Name on The Back
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 4
« Reply #131: August 16, 2009, 02:58:20 PM »
game over.


oh shuddup. it's the 6th inning.

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 33558
  • Lets go to work
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 4
« Reply #132: August 16, 2009, 02:59:12 PM »
Why not just have him try to hit a fly ball?

Holy crap. Riggleman is clueless. No way in any scenario should he be the manager next year.

You know jack crap about baseball. How about you let the professionals handle the decision making?

Online sportsfan882

  • Posts: 82741
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 4
« Reply #133: August 16, 2009, 02:59:24 PM »
oh shuddup. it's the 6th inning.
we should be up 4-0.

instead we are down 4-3.

freaking awful. this team is freaking awful. this is one of the most frustrating losses of the year.

Offline greven

  • Posts: 99
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 4
« Reply #134: August 16, 2009, 02:59:33 PM »
With the way Gonzales is hitting I'm all for a squeeze. Good lord he can't even get the bat on a stupid breaking ball?

Offline EdStroud

  • Posts: 8659
  • My B-Day?
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 4
« Reply #135: August 16, 2009, 02:59:37 PM »
Why not just have him try to hit a fly ball?

Holy crap. Riggleman is clueless. No way in any scenario should he be the manager next year.
Gonzo is not a fly ball hitter and on a safety squeeze willingham is still on third

Online sportsfan882

  • Posts: 82741
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 4
« Reply #136: August 16, 2009, 03:01:24 PM »
You know jack crap about baseball. How about you let the professionals handle the decision making?
and you don't know anything either. stfu

since when is this team capable of executing a suicide squeeze? Willingham is slow and Gonzalez has shown he can't handle the bat.

So dumb. Also thrilled that Belliard started at 3B and batted third today. brilliant decision by Rig :clap: :clap:

Online sportsfan882

  • Posts: 82741
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 4
« Reply #137: August 16, 2009, 03:02:11 PM »
I can never remember a suicide squeeze by the Nats. why call for one now?

it would have been one thing if Morgan was up to bat and a semi-fast runner was on third base.

Offline EdStroud

  • Posts: 8659
  • My B-Day?
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 4
« Reply #138: August 16, 2009, 03:02:42 PM »
No, Dibbs it is driving a lot of people nuts

Online sportsfan882

  • Posts: 82741
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 4
« Reply #139: August 16, 2009, 03:03:35 PM »
gives up a double to the pitcher :bang:

Offline EdStroud

  • Posts: 8659
  • My B-Day?
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 4
« Reply #140: August 16, 2009, 03:04:36 PM »
good play by Dunn

Offline JMW IV

  • Posts: 11254
  • Name on the Front > Name on The Back
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 4
« Reply #141: August 16, 2009, 03:04:39 PM »


freaking awful. this team is freaking awful. this is one of the most frustrating losses of the year.

If we win this game, Chief bans You for a Month.

If we lose, Chief bans Me for a Month.

deal?

Online sportsfan882

  • Posts: 82741
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 4
« Reply #142: August 16, 2009, 03:04:45 PM »
Take him out!!! He's got nothing out there

Online sportsfan882

  • Posts: 82741
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 4
« Reply #143: August 16, 2009, 03:06:03 PM »
If we win this game, Chief bans You for a Month.

If we lose, Chief bans Me for a Month.

deal?
no thanks. I want to be able to post about SS tonight and tomorrow.

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 33558
  • Lets go to work
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 4
« Reply #144: August 16, 2009, 03:06:15 PM »
and you don't know anything either. stfu

since when is this team capable of executing a suicide squeeze? Willingham is slow and Gonzalez has shown he can't handle the bat.

You clearly don't understand the concept of a suicide squeeze. It's supposed to be a surprise so what happened doesn't happen. If Gonzalez gets the ball in play, it's a run and you're cheering like it was the move of the year.

Offline EdStroud

  • Posts: 8659
  • My B-Day?
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 4
« Reply #145: August 16, 2009, 03:07:45 PM »
Reds trivia again(tough one here)

OK got a feeling a lot of you will be looking this one up.

This Reds player had his number retired and then reactivated 2 years later.  The number was then retired for another player later, who was this player and what number was it?
Will post answer after the 7th inning

Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 4
« Reply #146: August 16, 2009, 03:11:21 PM »
no thanks. I want to be able to post about SS tonight and tomorrow.

Hooray! We can't wait.

Online sportsfan882

  • Posts: 82741
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 4
« Reply #147: August 16, 2009, 03:11:42 PM »
You clearly don't understand the concept of a suicide squeeze. It's supposed to be a surprise so what happened doesn't happen. If Gonzalez gets the ball in play, it's a run and you're cheering like it was the move of the year.
what would ever lead Jim to believe that Gonzalez can get that ball in play? It was a terrible pitch to make contact with too. breaking ball way inside.

still, he should have fouled it off. but that doesn't mean it wasn't a terrible decision to call for the play in the first place.

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 33558
  • Lets go to work
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 4
« Reply #148: August 16, 2009, 03:11:51 PM »
Will post answer after the 7th inning

That's a good question! I'm guessing its someone that wore 42?

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 33558
  • Lets go to work
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 4
« Reply #149: August 16, 2009, 03:13:14 PM »
what would ever lead Jim to believe that Gonzalez can get that ball in play? It was a terrible pitch to make contact with too. breaking ball way inside.

still, he should have fouled it off. but that doesn't mean it wasn't a terrible decision to call for the play in the first place.

You don't call a squeeze as the pitch is in the air! How in the world was Riggleman supposed to know the pitch would be awful? Not everyone has the ability of hindsight that you use to back up all of your arguments. Some people actually have to make decisions in real time.