Author Topic: Nationals @ Brewers, Game 4  (Read 5167 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 29998
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Nationals @ Brewers, Game 4
« Reply #275: July 30, 2009, 04:37:13 PM »
Wasn't eagleskins already banned for life?

Yes, I just meant I banned his new alias along with him.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 51807
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Brewers, Game 4
« Reply #276: July 30, 2009, 04:39:13 PM »
Yes, I just meant I banned his new alias along with him.

I feel bad for ousting him but his rhetoric was too obvious and it didn't help that he used the name of his alma mater in his new screen name.  :?

Offline EdStroud

  • Posts: 8695
Re: Nationals @ Brewers, Game 4
« Reply #277: July 30, 2009, 04:40:53 PM »
Ok- so the Nationals should get rid of Gonzalez, Hernandez, The Belly, MacDougal and Kearns.
No one mentions Villone?

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 29998
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Nationals @ Brewers, Game 4
« Reply #278: July 30, 2009, 04:41:12 PM »
I feel bad for ousting him but his rhetoric was too obvious and it didn't help that he used the name of his alma mater in his new screen name.  :?

I spotted his posts before I noticed you said anything about it.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37337
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals @ Brewers, Game 4
« Reply #279: July 30, 2009, 04:41:19 PM »
Hey everyone!  The Nats are back!

yeah for a second there i was enjoying not losing night in and night out.  now i just remembered we are still 9 years away from ever doing anything haha.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 51807
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Brewers, Game 4
« Reply #280: July 30, 2009, 04:41:49 PM »
If I get banned I'm coming back as EyeLoveZimm2!  :lmao:

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 51807
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Brewers, Game 4
« Reply #281: July 30, 2009, 04:44:25 PM »
Ok- so the Nationals should get rid of Gonzalez, Hernandez, The Belly, MacDougal and Kearns.
No one mentions Villone?


I think people are trying to forget he is even on the roster now.

I spotted his posts before I noticed you said anything about it.


I actually set a little trap for him in one of my posts where I mentioned his alma mater was Southern (a black college) when I know he went to Georgia Southern. I wrote Georgia in really small letters and waited to see if he would set me straight on his alma mater. I waited for him to correct the slight/insult but he either didn't bite or he was gone before he got a chance to set the record straight. 

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37337
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals @ Brewers, Game 4
« Reply #282: July 30, 2009, 04:44:44 PM »
If I get banned I'm coming back as EyeLoveZimm2!  :lmao:
or AnnieSavoy2 8)

Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23211
Re: Nationals @ Brewers, Game 4
« Reply #283: July 30, 2009, 04:45:18 PM »
Jorge Sosa kind of looks like Colome.


Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37337
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals @ Brewers, Game 4
« Reply #284: July 30, 2009, 04:45:54 PM »
we just split a series we could've swept.

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 33563
  • Lets go to work
Re: Nationals @ Brewers, Game 4
« Reply #285: July 30, 2009, 04:45:59 PM »
Jorge Sosa kind of looks like Colome.

(Image removed from quote.)


Just as bad.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 51807
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Brewers, Game 4
« Reply #286: July 30, 2009, 04:46:09 PM »
or AnnieSavoy2 8)

Too obvious. I won't make the same mistake eagleskins made. I'll pick something no one will suspect like MinorLeaguersRock!

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 51807
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Brewers, Game 4
« Reply #287: July 30, 2009, 04:47:00 PM »
Jorge Sosa kind of looks like Colome.

(Image removed from quote.)


Yeah they are almost carbon copies. I missed what they said about him.

Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23211
Re: Nationals @ Brewers, Game 4
« Reply #288: July 30, 2009, 04:47:48 PM »
Yeah they are almost carbon copies. I missed what they said about him.

He's been pitching really well in the minors recently.

Offline EdStroud

  • Posts: 8695
Re: Nationals @ Brewers, Game 4
« Reply #289: July 30, 2009, 04:48:17 PM »
I hate Jose Morales
See Ya

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37337
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals @ Brewers, Game 4
« Reply #290: July 30, 2009, 04:49:18 PM »
Too obvious. I won't make the same mistake eagleskins made. I'll pick something no one will suspect like MinorLeaguersRock!

haha MinorLeaguersRock FTW!!!!!!!!!

Re: Nationals @ Brewers, Game 4
« Reply #291: July 30, 2009, 04:51:19 PM »
Just playing with ya dude. At least you don't go crying about me to the chief like NOTLD does and then my posts mysteriously vanish. (Image removed from quote.)


Go take your pill, Grandpa. You're getting delusional, as usual. I did no such thing.

Offline nats2playoffs

  • Posts: 17404
Re: Nationals @ Brewers, Game 4
« Reply #292: July 30, 2009, 04:53:07 PM »
we just split a series we could've swept.


GAME OVER.  WE LOSE.



On the bright side, I've had Gallardo on my fantasy teams the last 3 years.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 83149
Re: Nationals @ Brewers, Game 4
« Reply #293: July 30, 2009, 05:18:14 PM »
Tomterp proved wrong again by me. Too bad we had to lose for that to be the case.

everyone gets their laughs at me but once again what I said was 100% correct.

Good game by RZ and Morgan. Too bad no one else showed up.

Offline Nathan

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 10558
  • Wow. Such warnings. Very baseball. Moderator Doge.
Re: Nationals @ Brewers, Game 4
« Reply #294: July 30, 2009, 05:22:54 PM »
Tomterp proved wrong again by me. Too bad we had to lose for that to be the case.

everyone gets their laughs at me but once again what I said was 100% correct.

Good game by RZ and Morgan. Too bad no one else showed up.
So you guessed that a team with a .314 winning percentage would lose.  Yep.  You sure showed all of us. :roll:

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 83149
Re: Nationals @ Brewers, Game 4
« Reply #295: July 30, 2009, 05:27:43 PM »
So you guessed that a team with a .314 winning percentage would lose.  Yep.  You sure showed all of us. :roll:
Would lose the last 2 games of the series. Yet tomterp claimed that we had as good of a chance as winning those games after the first two. :?

PS Joe West is a fat nag

Offline Nathan

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 10558
  • Wow. Such warnings. Very baseball. Moderator Doge.
Re: Nationals @ Brewers, Game 4
« Reply #296: July 30, 2009, 05:33:29 PM »
Would lose the last 2 games of the series. Yet tomterp claimed that we had as good of a chance as winning those games after the first two. :?

PS Joe West is a fat nag
We did.  "A chance" does not equal "we will".

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 83149
Re: Nationals @ Brewers, Game 4
« Reply #297: July 30, 2009, 05:35:01 PM »
We did.  "A chance" does not equal "we will".
we had zero chance and the results show that. we were never going to win those last two after miraculously winning the first two.

It's a shame. We must win all 4 games in Pittsburgh to make up for it.

Offline Nathan

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 10558
  • Wow. Such warnings. Very baseball. Moderator Doge.
Re: Nationals @ Brewers, Game 4
« Reply #298: July 30, 2009, 05:40:11 PM »
we had zero chance and the results show that. we were never going to win those last two after miraculously winning the first two.

It's a shame. We must win all 4 games in Pittsburgh to make up for it.
:lmao:

Whatever man.  I'll base my opinion on the mathematics probability and you can base yours on whatever you want.  We had a small chance to win each of the first games and an equally small chance to win each of the second games.  If I were a betting man, mathematically I'd always bet against the Nationals.  I'm not trying to bash you, we just have different ways of thinking.


Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 51807
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Brewers, Game 4
« Reply #299: July 30, 2009, 05:43:05 PM »
It's evident that SF has never actually played competitive ball of any kind. I definitely would not want someone on my team who espouses such freaked up logic. How hilarious would it be to see SF at a club deciding on which chick to try to pick up? Would the odds be on his side or against him? What would be the biggest factor in determining the odds? And after striking out looking or swinging, would he say to himself he never had a chance anyway? If so, how long before he gives up altogether?