Author Topic: Nationals vs Padres, Game 2  (Read 4200 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Nathan

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 10706
  • Wow. Such warnings. Very baseball. Moderator Doge.
Nationals vs Padres, Game 2
« Topic Start: July 25, 2009, 03:50:36 PM »
Game Time: 7:05 PM
Venue: Nationals Park
TV: MASN 2
Radio: WFED 1500, SBN 1390, ESPN 730, XM 175


 (28-68)


J.D. Martin
0-1, 11.25 ERA

(CF) Morgan
(SS) Guzman
(3B) Zimmerman
(LF) Dunn
(1B) Johnson
(RF) Willingham
(2B) Belliard
(SC) Nieves
(SP) Martin

(38-59)  


Tim Stauffer
0-1, 2.08 ERA

Gwynn (CF)
Cabrera (SS)
Gonzalez (1B)
Kouzmanoff (3B)
Headley (LF)
Macias (RF)
Rodriguez (2B)
Lobaton (SC)
Stauffer (SP)
                                 

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 28377
  • Hell yes!
Re: Nationals vs Padres, Game 2
« Reply #1: July 25, 2009, 03:51:22 PM »
haha, Martis vs. Redding?   

Offline Nathan

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 10706
  • Wow. Such warnings. Very baseball. Moderator Doge.
Re: Nationals vs Padres, Game 2
« Reply #2: July 25, 2009, 03:52:12 PM »
haha, Martis vs. Redding?   
Just copied and pasted it, gotta edit it up now :lol:

Offline cmdterps44

  • Posts: 15536
  • Future
Re: Nationals vs Padres, Game 2
« Reply #3: July 25, 2009, 03:54:04 PM »
Good matchup

Online Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 34030
  • Next year, maybe?
Re: Nationals vs Padres, Game 2
« Reply #4: July 25, 2009, 04:08:40 PM »
Loss.

I used to love watching Tim pitch for the University of Richmond.

Offline Obed_Marsh

  • Posts: 7666
  • ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn
    • Photos
Re: Nationals vs Padres, Game 2
« Reply #5: July 25, 2009, 04:11:10 PM »
Lineups here slacker. The sacrifices may need to expand to include lazy game day thread creators.

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/nationalsjournal/2009/07/tonights_lineups_42.html

Offline Nathan

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 10706
  • Wow. Such warnings. Very baseball. Moderator Doge.
Re: Nationals vs Padres, Game 2
« Reply #6: July 25, 2009, 04:20:08 PM »
Lineups here slacker. The sacrifices may need to expand to include lazy game day thread creators.

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/nationalsjournal/2009/07/tonights_lineups_42.html
I have no idea what you're talking about.

Offline Obed_Marsh

  • Posts: 7666
  • ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn
    • Photos
Re: Nationals vs Padres, Game 2
« Reply #7: July 25, 2009, 04:24:27 PM »
I have no idea what you're talking about.

It doesn't matter now that you've replaced the questions marks with players. :)

Offline Nathan

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 10706
  • Wow. Such warnings. Very baseball. Moderator Doge.
Re: Nationals vs Padres, Game 2
« Reply #8: July 25, 2009, 04:27:15 PM »
It doesn't matter now that you've replaced the questions marks with players. :)
Nah, didn't happen  :halo:

Thanks for the link, I was having a tough time finding the lineups

Offline Obed_Marsh

  • Posts: 7666
  • ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn
    • Photos
Re: Nationals vs Padres, Game 2
« Reply #9: July 25, 2009, 04:29:57 PM »
Nah, didn't happen  :halo:

Thanks for the link, I was having a tough time finding the lineups


No worries. Tiny fonts are cool.  8)

Online Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 34030
  • Next year, maybe?
Re: Nationals vs Padres, Game 2
« Reply #10: July 25, 2009, 04:36:38 PM »
No worries. Tiny fonts are cool.

Offline fan

  • Posts: 214
  • If Yost becomes Manager, I am done w/ the Nats.
Re: Nationals vs Padres, Game 2
« Reply #11: July 25, 2009, 05:08:32 PM »
ARGHHHHHHHHH  Are you F'ing kidding me Riggleman?  Why is this so difficult for you to understand?  Belliard does this team no favors.  We know what he is.  He has NO trade value.  We want to know if Alberto can play full time. 

Martin deserves an adequate team behind him.  Belliard and Guzman makes for one of the worst infields in baseball.  What is wrong with you old man?

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37359
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals vs Padres, Game 2
« Reply #12: July 25, 2009, 05:16:30 PM »
ARGHHHHHHHHH  Are you F'ing kidding me Riggleman?  Why is this so difficult for you to understand?  Belliard does this team no favors.  We know what he is.  He has NO trade value.  We want to know if Alberto can play full time. 

Martin deserves an adequate team behind him.  Belliard and Guzman makes for one of the worst infields in baseball.  What is wrong with you old man?

Anderson Hernandez is just as bad.  I'm going to continue to say it until we get a solid 2nd baseman (or just move Gonzalez over there full-time) we had a chance to get Orlando Hudson.  None of this crap would've happened if we had him.

I can't believe how bad Mock was last night and the defense wasn't great either.  Padres pitcher couldn't throw any of his breaking pitches for strikes (and I re-watched a little of the game today where Dibble said the same thing) and we could only get two runs off of him.  Terrible game overall.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 87158
Re: Nationals vs Padres, Game 2
« Reply #13: July 25, 2009, 05:20:24 PM »
Belliard is hitting .191 and is 34 years old. I can't believe Mike thinks he can get something for him.

Hernandez is hitting 60 points higher and is 8 years younger.


Hammonds, who is going to start for us at 2B in 2010? I have no clue.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37359
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals vs Padres, Game 2
« Reply #14: July 25, 2009, 05:22:07 PM »
Belliard is hitting .191 and is 34 years old. I can't believe Mike thinks he can get something for him. (Image removed from quote.)

Hernandez is hitting 60 points higher and is 8 years younger.


Hammonds, who is going to start for us at 2B in 2010? I have no clue.


It has to be an outside option.  Again, O-Dog would've been awesome in a Nats uni.  Oh well no surprise considering who our owners are.  Cheapskates.

And I'm not advocating starting Belliard over Hernandez, or even Harris out there ... none are ideal starting 2nd basemen.  I think Gonzalez should play there everyday in the mean time.  Our organization just has a tough time cutting the ugly fat (Kearns, Belliard, etc).

And again, SF, you bash Mike Rizzo ... but your boy Jim Bowden brought this mess on all of us. 

Offline UMDNats

  • Posts: 12107
Re: Nationals vs Padres, Game 2
« Reply #15: July 25, 2009, 05:40:25 PM »
we are going to get spanked by the HURTING padres yet again.

we play down to our opponents, the worse they are, they worse we play (amazingly), evidenced by our 4 errors last night.

we prob won't take 1 game from the next-worst team

thanks lerners, we're doing so great with your "plan"!

oh wait, that "plan" was just a way for you to make a crapload of money

Offline UMDNats

  • Posts: 12107
Re: Nationals vs Padres, Game 2
« Reply #16: July 25, 2009, 05:44:31 PM »
i am glad to see nyjer back in the lineup

Offline JMW IV

  • Posts: 11302
  • Name on the Front > Name on The Back
Re: Nationals vs Padres, Game 2
« Reply #17: July 25, 2009, 05:45:02 PM »
So Hammonds , when hudson rejected our offer to him, were the lerners supposed to force him to sign at gunpoint? Just curious since you are whining about him again as if we did not offer him a deal and didn't get turned down.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37359
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals vs Padres, Game 2
« Reply #18: July 25, 2009, 05:47:38 PM »
So Hammonds , when hudson rejected our offer to him, were the lerners supposed to force him to sign at gunpoint? Just curious since you are whining about him again as if we did not offer him a deal and didn't get turned down.
Where do you get he rejected the offer? 

Offline UMDNats

  • Posts: 12107
Re: Nationals vs Padres, Game 2
« Reply #19: July 25, 2009, 05:48:22 PM »
So Hammonds , when hudson rejected our offer to him, were the lerners supposed to force him to sign at gunpoint? Just curious since you are whining about him again as if we did not offer him a deal and didn't get turned down.

looking forward to another "hammonds vs. everyone" thread that starts because he mentions we should have signed "o-dogg", a thread that is just  him saying we should have signed him, and others saying it wasn't possible

nobody wins, and it eventually gets locked

fun times for all

Offline JMW IV

  • Posts: 11302
  • Name on the Front > Name on The Back
Re: Nationals vs Padres, Game 2
« Reply #20: July 25, 2009, 05:49:59 PM »
As far as i remember we offered hudson a contract early in free agency and he quickly turned it down. Then he eventually signed with the dodgers for the same price as we offered, or very close to it.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37359
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals vs Padres, Game 2
« Reply #21: July 25, 2009, 05:50:33 PM »
looking forward to another "hammonds vs. everyone" thread that starts because he mentions we should have signed "o-dogg", a thread that is just  him saying we should have signed him, and others saying it wasn't possible

nobody wins, and it eventually gets locked

fun times for all

haha umdnats FTW! 

Lerner Family is doing a great job.  You can tell b/c they have so many fans on here.  It's like a classroom of Nats320's.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37359
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals vs Padres, Game 2
« Reply #22: July 25, 2009, 05:54:08 PM »
As far as i remember we offered hudson a contract early in free agency and he quickly turned it down. Then he eventually signed with the dodgers for the same price as we offered, or very close to it.

http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20090212&content_id=3821812&vkey=news_was&fext=.jsp&c_id=was&partnerId=rss_was

we dropped out. 

and there had to be better options out there in the offseason than what we have now. 

Offline JMW IV

  • Posts: 11302
  • Name on the Front > Name on The Back
Re: Nationals vs Padres, Game 2
« Reply #23: July 25, 2009, 05:55:12 PM »
Oh stfu both of you. This has nothing to do with being a lerners fan and everything to do with you continually whining and crying over a player who did not want to come here in nearly every game thread.

Offline JMW IV

  • Posts: 11302
  • Name on the Front > Name on The Back
Re: Nationals vs Padres, Game 2
« Reply #24: July 25, 2009, 05:59:34 PM »
The lerners have made 40 thousand stupid decisions during their ownership, but not signing hudson is the big difference maker, amirite?