Author Topic: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3  (Read 4510 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline skippy1999

  • Posts: 6437
Re: Nationals vs. Mets, Game 3
« Reply #125: July 22, 2009, 08:34:19 PM »
Hahahah Bob was definitely annoyed!

Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23233
Re: Nationals vs. Mets, Game 3
« Reply #126: July 22, 2009, 08:35:06 PM »
Nice. :clap:

Offline skippy1999

  • Posts: 6437
Re: Nationals vs. Mets, Game 3
« Reply #127: July 22, 2009, 08:35:08 PM »
Wooohooo!

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 33991
  • Next year, maybe?
Re: Nationals vs. Mets, Game 3
« Reply #128: July 22, 2009, 08:35:11 PM »
HAMMER!

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 86983
Re: Nationals vs. Mets, Game 3
« Reply #129: July 22, 2009, 08:35:19 PM »
smoked it :whip: :whip:

Offline PC

  • Posts: 41575
Re: Nationals vs. Mets, Game 3
« Reply #130: July 22, 2009, 08:35:24 PM »
Josh's trade value just went up a little more!

Offline natsfan4evr

  • Posts: 6171
Re: Nationals vs. Mets, Game 3
« Reply #131: July 22, 2009, 08:35:29 PM »
I LOVE WILLINGHAM!

Offline DCFan

  • Posts: 3649
  • What are you dense?
Re: Nationals vs. Mets, Game 3
« Reply #132: July 22, 2009, 08:35:36 PM »
Willingham finally gets a homer with someone on base.  :clap:

Offline fersaltiel

  • Posts: 1009
Re: Nationals vs. Mets, Game 3
« Reply #133: July 22, 2009, 08:35:38 PM »
I think Stammen has pitched a pretty good game so far. Only given up 3 hits ... come on guys!! He's only a rookie!

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 28361
  • Hell yes!
Re: Nationals vs. Mets, Game 3
« Reply #134: July 22, 2009, 08:35:52 PM »
Not even close. Morgan gets nailed more than the class slut at a keg party.

Well, I'm a veteran of more than a handful of keg parties.  However, I can say with absolute assurance, that our switch to the "different drink in every room" theme was a much greater lure for the nubile.  :icon_mrgreen:

We did have to work past that initial phase where we sampled our drinks starting a little too early, and found the grain to be as devastating on the perpetrators as on the intended victims.    :glug: :? :? :-[

Offline Nathan

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 10706
  • Wow. Such warnings. Very baseball. Moderator Doge.
Re: Nationals vs. Mets, Game 3
« Reply #135: July 22, 2009, 08:35:55 PM »
Willingham finally gets a homer with someone on base.  :clap:
He had one at Houston too.

Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23233
Re: Nationals vs. Mets, Game 3
« Reply #136: July 22, 2009, 08:36:03 PM »
Willingham finally gets a homer with someone on base.  :clap:

Two of them now.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 86983
Re: Nationals vs. Mets, Game 3
« Reply #137: July 22, 2009, 08:36:21 PM »
Josh's trade value just went up a little more!
I thought you wanted us to keep him and acquire more players like him :lol:

Offline natsfan4evr

  • Posts: 6171
Re: Nationals vs. Mets, Game 3
« Reply #138: July 22, 2009, 08:36:27 PM »
Josh's trade value just went up a little more!
They better not trade him. He's under team control for a long time.

Offline DCFan

  • Posts: 3649
  • What are you dense?
Re: Nationals vs. Mets, Game 3
« Reply #139: July 22, 2009, 08:37:09 PM »
He had one at Houston too.

Damn, I missed it!  ;)

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 28361
  • Hell yes!
Re: Nationals vs. Mets, Game 3
« Reply #140: July 22, 2009, 08:38:03 PM »
I don't know what Anderson Hernandez has done to somebody in power, on this team.  Guzman should never see the field, as a Nationals player, again.

In the past when Guzman has sucked, he's been hiding some injury.  Mark my words, the Nats will discover something within the next week or so.  Guzman hides that sort of thing.  Remember, he wanted to go back out on the field with his thumb ligament torn from the bone.

Offline Nathan

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 10706
  • Wow. Such warnings. Very baseball. Moderator Doge.
Re: Nationals vs. Mets, Game 3
« Reply #141: July 22, 2009, 08:39:01 PM »
Damn, I missed it!  ;)
Actually, Stammen pitched in that game too.  It was the 13-2 blowout at Houston.

Offline natsfan4evr

  • Posts: 6171
Re: Nationals vs. Mets, Game 3
« Reply #142: July 22, 2009, 08:39:08 PM »
He's a triple from the cycle

Offline DCFan

  • Posts: 3649
  • What are you dense?
Re: Nationals vs. Mets, Game 3
« Reply #143: July 22, 2009, 08:39:26 PM »
In the past when Guzman has sucked, he's been hiding some injury.  Mark my words, the Nats will discover something within the next week or so.  Guzman hides that sort of thing.  Remember, he wanted to go back out on the field with his thumb ligament torn from the bone.

Well they told us he had bunions about a week ago. Maybe he's got an ingrown nail too.  :rofl:

Offline DCFan

  • Posts: 3649
  • What are you dense?
Re: Nationals vs. Mets, Game 3
« Reply #144: July 22, 2009, 08:40:19 PM »
Actually, Stammen pitched in that game too.  It was the 13-2 blowout at Houston.

Well that explains it, it was lost in the shuffle.  ;)

Offline cmdterps44

  • Posts: 15536
  • Future
Re: Nationals vs. Mets, Game 3
« Reply #145: July 22, 2009, 08:40:21 PM »
Willingham is a stud! 10 fantasy poins woohoo.

Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23233
Re: Nationals vs. Mets, Game 3
« Reply #146: July 22, 2009, 08:41:25 PM »
Willingham is a stud! 10 fantasy poins woohoo.

Holliday got me 22 the other day. That was nice.

Offline PC

  • Posts: 41575
Re: Nationals vs. Mets, Game 3
« Reply #147: July 22, 2009, 08:41:43 PM »
This inning could get ugly fast for Stammen.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 86983
Re: Nationals vs. Mets, Game 3
« Reply #148: July 22, 2009, 08:42:17 PM »
Guzman is pinning his struggles on being bumped down to the 6th spot. He sounds like Soriano. :?

Quote
Most players, interim manager Jim Riggleman said on Wednesday, "don't really care where they hit. They really don't." But at least one player on Riggleman's roster, Cristian Guzman, cares quite a bit. Dropped to sixth in the lineup after the team acquired natural leadoff man Nyjer Morgan, Guzman has since dropped into a slump as well.

Whether that slump is a byproduct of the lineup shift or a mere coincidence, Riggleman isn't sure. But the evidence of a link is strong enough that Washington, in an effort to jump-start its shortstop, is moving Guzman back to the No. 2 spot. Perhaps for the foreseeable future.

"Somehow or another it can get in your head, where you're hitting in the lineup," Riggleman said. "Whether it did or not [with Guzman] I don't know, but we're going to try to get him going again and have him hitting higher in the lineup... I said to him a few nights ago, 'You don't want to hit down there, do ya?' And he was just like, 'Nah.' "

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 28361
  • Hell yes!
Re: Nationals vs. Mets, Game 3
« Reply #149: July 22, 2009, 08:42:55 PM »
Well they told us he had bunions about a week ago. Maybe he's got an ingrown nail too.  :rofl:

People tend to laugh and minimize the importance of feet to athletic endeavors, but it all starts  there.   If your feet aren't in good shape, all kinds of adverse impact.