Author Topic: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1  (Read 4854 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 52793
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #300: July 20, 2009, 09:12:51 PM »
:?

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37010
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #301: July 20, 2009, 09:12:56 PM »
So much for the home crowd :bang:

Offline Minty Fresh

  • Posts: 16328
  • GOOOOOOOOOOD MORNIN' VIETNAM!
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #302: July 20, 2009, 09:13:12 PM »
Jeff Francouer slumping?  NO PROBLEM - HERE COMES LOGAN freakING KENSING!

Offline PC

  • Posts: 39541
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #303: July 20, 2009, 09:13:27 PM »
Runners on first and second, no outs...no runs scored.

Let's talk about situational hitting, shall we?

Offline shoeshineboy

  • Posts: 7330
  • Walks Kill!! Walks Kill! Walks Kill!!!!
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #304: July 20, 2009, 09:13:40 PM »
Pathetic. Way to serve it up for mr swing at everything.

Offline Minty Fresh

  • Posts: 16328
  • GOOOOOOOOOOD MORNIN' VIETNAM!
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #305: July 20, 2009, 09:14:07 PM »
Let's talk about situational hitting, shall we?

O.K.   :hang:

Offline shoeshineboy

  • Posts: 7330
  • Walks Kill!! Walks Kill! Walks Kill!!!!
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #306: July 20, 2009, 09:14:42 PM »
40 games under .500?! Yikes.

Offline Minty Fresh

  • Posts: 16328
  • GOOOOOOOOOOD MORNIN' VIETNAM!
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #307: July 20, 2009, 09:15:35 PM »
40 games under .500?! Yikes.

I didn't even think that was possible.

Offline BerkeleyNat

  • Posts: 5026
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #308: July 20, 2009, 09:15:43 PM »
40 games under .500? This team is truly horrible. We have an average AAA team masquerading as a major league ballclub.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 52793
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #309: July 20, 2009, 09:15:46 PM »
So what Carpenter, we ended last season 43 games under .500. We'll reach that abyss on Friday so we're just going to pick up where we left off and go from there.

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 27481
  • Hell yes!
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #310: July 20, 2009, 09:16:00 PM »
Did Bob just say the Mets carry a 4-1 lead into the ninth? Or am I too damn drunk?  Or both?

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 52793
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #311: July 20, 2009, 09:17:15 PM »
40 games under .500? This team is truly horrible. We have an average AAA team masquerading as a major league ballclub.

We're a marginal AAA team at this point.

Offline Minty Fresh

  • Posts: 16328
  • GOOOOOOOOOOD MORNIN' VIETNAM!
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #312: July 20, 2009, 09:17:39 PM »
Did Bob just say the Mets carry a 4-1 lead into the ninth? Or am I too damn drunk?  Or both?

I dunno.  I'm blacked out on the game so I don't get Carp/Dibbs.  But I am listening to Charlie and Dave (both more competent than Carp) and neither mentioned a 4-1 lead.

But yes, you're too drunk.

EDIT:  My guess is Carp said a FOUR RUN lead.

Offline BerkeleyNat

  • Posts: 5026
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #313: July 20, 2009, 09:17:48 PM »
Jeff Francouer slumping?  NO PROBLEM - HERE COMES LOGAN freakING KENSING!

Isn't that always the story with the Nationals? Slumping club comes in and tees off on the Nationals. Nothing fixes a slump like coming to Washington. Wait till the Nationals play San Diego. They'll look like world beaters for a series.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 52793
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #314: July 20, 2009, 09:18:10 PM »
Did Bob just say the Mets carry a 4-1 lead into the ninth? Or am I too damn drunk?  Or both?


You're drunk. He said they carry a 4-run lead.


Offline BerkeleyNat

  • Posts: 5026
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #315: July 20, 2009, 09:19:52 PM »
8-32 against the east. It's not like the Nats play in a power division or anything. Everyone sucks except the Phillies. These numbers are depressing.

Offline Minty Fresh

  • Posts: 16328
  • GOOOOOOOOOOD MORNIN' VIETNAM!
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #316: July 20, 2009, 09:21:24 PM »
Shouldn't have banned sportsfan tonight.  This team deserves his vitriol.

Offline shoeshineboy

  • Posts: 7330
  • Walks Kill!! Walks Kill! Walks Kill!!!!
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #317: July 20, 2009, 09:21:30 PM »
We're a marginal AAA team at this point.

And so much for being a young team. Look at this lineup. Kearns and Morgan were the youngest position players, and they're 29. So much for the youth movement.

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 27481
  • Hell yes!
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #318: July 20, 2009, 09:21:44 PM »
But yes, you're too drunk.

EDIT:  My guess is Carp said a FOUR RUN lead.

Ah, that is probably right.  On both counts. 

Offline PC

  • Posts: 39541
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #319: July 20, 2009, 09:21:52 PM »
This team is so profoundly uncompetetive.  I don't know how it's possible to be this bad.

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 27481
  • Hell yes!
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #320: July 20, 2009, 09:22:44 PM »
Sinking further into the abyss.  No bottom in sight.

Offline PC

  • Posts: 39541
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #321: July 20, 2009, 09:23:31 PM »
They certainly did "drop it to the Mets", Bob.  :icon_frown:

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 52793
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #322: July 20, 2009, 09:23:44 PM »
And so much for being a young team. Look at this lineup. Kearns and Morgan were the youngest position players, and they're 29. So much for the youth movement.


:shock:

Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #323: July 20, 2009, 09:23:48 PM »
What a delightful evening


Offline Minty Fresh

  • Posts: 16328
  • GOOOOOOOOOOD MORNIN' VIETNAM!
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #324: July 20, 2009, 09:24:50 PM »
What other team should I root for so that I have a dog in this year's pennant chase?

Mets?  No.
Phillies?  No.
Marlins?  No.
Cubs?  HELL NO.
Cardinals?  Perhaps....
Brewers?  Perhaps....
Astros?  Probably (but they aren't going anywhere)
Giants?  No.
Rockies?  No.



Dodgers it is.