Author Topic: Nationals @ Rockies, Game 1  (Read 7417 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline natsfan4evr

  • Posts: 6171
Re: Nationals @ Rockies, Game 1
« Reply #150: July 06, 2009, 09:39:43 PM »
That's not an excuse for being shutout or even losing, for that matter.

He's lost five games and his ERA is higher than 0.00 so he give up runs.

He loses and gives up runs!
It's not an excuse, but he's shutout other teams before. It's only the 5th inning. Stop freaking out.
We are 31 games under .500. The team is trying. I don't see them packing it in.
Stammen is setting himself up for a good night. He can go 7 or 8 easily at this pace.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 91274
Re: Nationals @ Rockies, Game 1
« Reply #151: July 06, 2009, 09:40:09 PM »
You just contradicted yourself in your first sentence. Jeez.
look at his numbers. 9 seasons prior to this one:

2 Seasons with an ERA 3.00-3.99
3 Seasons with an ERA 4.00-4.99
3 Seasons with an ERA 5.00-5.99
1 Season  with an ERA 6.00+

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 91274
Re: Nationals @ Rockies, Game 1
« Reply #152: July 06, 2009, 09:41:09 PM »
Hammonds, Derek Norris just hit his 18th bomb in 277 ABs :az:

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37365
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals @ Rockies, Game 1
« Reply #153: July 06, 2009, 09:41:37 PM »
Hammonds, Derek Norris just hit his 18th bomb in 277 ABs :az:

stud.  it's a shame he has 12 errors though.

c'mon ronnie baseball.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37365
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals @ Rockies, Game 1
« Reply #154: July 06, 2009, 09:42:18 PM »
the thing is we just tattooed a sinkerball pitcher yesterday (i think lowe is better than marquis) ... we should be hitting more on this guy.

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 34850
  • Next year, maybe?
Re: Nationals @ Rockies, Game 1
« Reply #155: July 06, 2009, 09:42:45 PM »
look at his numbers. 9 seasons prior to this one:

2 Seasons with an ERA 3.00-3.99
3 Seasons with an ERA 4.00-4.99
3 Seasons with an ERA 5.00-5.99
1 Season  with an ERA 6.00+

So, is he awful, or is he league average.

Offline natsfan4evr

  • Posts: 6171
Re: Nationals @ Rockies, Game 1
« Reply #156: July 06, 2009, 09:43:33 PM »
That sun angle sucks

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 91274
Re: Nationals @ Rockies, Game 1
« Reply #157: July 06, 2009, 09:45:22 PM »
So, is he awful, or is he league average.
the last 3 years or so he has been about average but in '06 he had a 6.02 ERA in 194.1 innings. He's pretty inconsistent.

It is pretty safe to say that this year is a fluke for him. career year although he had 15 wins in '04.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 91274
Re: Nationals @ Rockies, Game 1
« Reply #158: July 06, 2009, 09:45:45 PM »
the thing is we just tattooed a sinkerball pitcher yesterday (i think lowe is better than marquis) ... we should be hitting more on this guy.
It's the Nats. would you expect anything else? 8)

Offline EdStroud

  • Posts: 8952
Re: Nationals @ Rockies, Game 1
« Reply #159: July 06, 2009, 09:46:06 PM »
the thing is we just tattooed a sinkerball pitcher yesterday (i think lowe is better than marquis) ... we should be hitting more on this guy.

The last two times Lowe has pitched at National Park he looks uncomfortable like he doesn't like the mound or something?

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 91274
Re: Nationals @ Rockies, Game 1
« Reply #160: July 06, 2009, 09:46:14 PM »
Phillies up 22-1 in the 8th against Cincy. :rofl:

Offline natsfan4evr

  • Posts: 6171
Re: Nationals @ Rockies, Game 1
« Reply #161: July 06, 2009, 09:46:30 PM »
He had a complete game shutout vs The Dodgers in his last start. Do they suck now?
He gave up 2 hits in 9 innings, and no walks

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 91274
Re: Nationals @ Rockies, Game 1
« Reply #162: July 06, 2009, 09:47:23 PM »
He had a complete game shutout vs The Dodgers in his last start. Do they suck now?
He gave up 2 hits in 9 innings, and no walks
The Dodgers are 22 games over .500. They can afford to punt games.

Offline natsfan4evr

  • Posts: 6171
Re: Nationals @ Rockies, Game 1
« Reply #163: July 06, 2009, 09:48:07 PM »
Phillies up 22-1 in the 8th against Cincy. :rofl:
They better stop. I don't want the Reds flirting with the blO's record

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37365
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals @ Rockies, Game 1
« Reply #164: July 06, 2009, 09:50:31 PM »
just our freaking luck.

Offline EdStroud

  • Posts: 8952
Re: Nationals @ Rockies, Game 1
« Reply #165: July 06, 2009, 09:50:34 PM »
way to keep playing Belly

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 91274
Re: Nationals @ Rockies, Game 1
« Reply #166: July 06, 2009, 09:53:05 PM »
Dibble called Carpenter a brown-noser. :rofl:


Offline natsfan4evr

  • Posts: 6171
Re: Nationals @ Rockies, Game 1
« Reply #167: July 06, 2009, 09:53:41 PM »
There goes my Guzman vote
Have fun staying home during the All Star break. (Not like he had a chance anyway)

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 91274
Re: Nationals @ Rockies, Game 1
« Reply #168: July 06, 2009, 09:54:07 PM »
that error could cost us 2 runs.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37365
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals @ Rockies, Game 1
« Reply #169: July 06, 2009, 09:54:39 PM »
eh, that guz play would've been close at first.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 91274
Re: Nationals @ Rockies, Game 1
« Reply #170: July 06, 2009, 09:54:59 PM »
0-2 count. must strike him out or turn 2.

Offline natsfan4evr

  • Posts: 6171
Re: Nationals @ Rockies, Game 1
« Reply #171: July 06, 2009, 09:55:43 PM »
0-2 count. must strike him out or turn 2.
happy?

Offline EdStroud

  • Posts: 8952
Re: Nationals @ Rockies, Game 1
« Reply #172: July 06, 2009, 09:56:02 PM »
Odds on Marquis passes Kearns in RBIs by end of season?

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37365
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals @ Rockies, Game 1
« Reply #173: July 06, 2009, 09:57:11 PM »
solid inning for Counter Strike.  he looks good today thus far (the 6th is key).

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 91274
Re: Nationals @ Rockies, Game 1
« Reply #174: July 06, 2009, 09:57:24 PM »
happy?
definitely. he just put away two batters after having them down 0-2. :clap:

we will see the next inning if he folds again the third time through the order.