Author Topic: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1  (Read 6267 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline shoeshineboy

  • Posts: 7449
  • Walks Kill!! Walks Kill! Walks Kill!!!!
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #325: June 05, 2009, 09:36:54 PM »
C'mon Pepto, get out of this.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 86983
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #326: June 05, 2009, 09:38:07 PM »
A Nats pitcher hasn't gotten a close strike all game.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 86983
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #327: June 05, 2009, 09:38:35 PM »
he's just playing with fire at this point. nibble nibble nibble

Offline shoeshineboy

  • Posts: 7449
  • Walks Kill!! Walks Kill! Walks Kill!!!!
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #328: June 05, 2009, 09:39:30 PM »
Ridiculous to throw around a guy batting .059 with runners and scoring position. No way that guy swings at a 3-0.

Offline ghostface

  • Posts: 1114
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #329: June 05, 2009, 09:39:39 PM »
another inning that should be over - thanks again guzman

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 54704
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #330: June 05, 2009, 09:40:15 PM »
another inning that should be over - thanks again guzman

True but Beimel has had chances to get out of this and has been nibbling.

Online tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 28361
  • Hell yes!
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #331: June 05, 2009, 09:40:20 PM »
Just give him another one just like the first two.

Offline nats2playoffs

  • Posts: 18228
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #332: June 05, 2009, 09:40:56 PM »

Joe Beimel & hair make it interesting

and thanks to  :worship: Elijah DUKES  :az: for a nice catch...

natinals 1
mets     0
umps     1

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 86983
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #333: June 05, 2009, 09:41:02 PM »
there's that curve ball. good job Joe :clap:

Offline shoeshineboy

  • Posts: 7449
  • Walks Kill!! Walks Kill! Walks Kill!!!!
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #334: June 05, 2009, 09:41:04 PM »
Way to go Pepto.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 54704
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #335: June 05, 2009, 09:41:09 PM »
Let's get a run to take the lead so we can watch Hanrahan blow it. 

Online tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 28361
  • Hell yes!
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #336: June 05, 2009, 09:42:17 PM »
Biemel has definitely gotten back a lot of his mojo. 

Bergmann, Villone are the other guys I trust.  At least we got a little something to work with.


Offline shoeshineboy

  • Posts: 7449
  • Walks Kill!! Walks Kill! Walks Kill!!!!
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #337: June 05, 2009, 09:42:34 PM »
Let's get a run to take the lead so we can watch Hanrahan blow it. 

Or we can get four so they put in Colome to make it interesting so they need to bring in Joel and then he blows it. That's the Nationals' Way.

Offline shoeshineboy

  • Posts: 7449
  • Walks Kill!! Walks Kill! Walks Kill!!!!
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #338: June 05, 2009, 09:44:03 PM »
Biemel has definitely gotten back a lot of his mojo. 

Bergmann, Villone are the other guys I trust.  At least we got a little something to work with.

Biemel is fairly reliable as against lefties. He's always been more of a situational 1 or 2 batter guy. Acta's misused him on more than one occasion.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 54704
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #339: June 05, 2009, 09:44:03 PM »
:clap:

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 86983
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #340: June 05, 2009, 09:44:16 PM »
Guzman with a 3 hit game. good to see.

haha, Carpenter was excited

Online tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 28361
  • Hell yes!
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #341: June 05, 2009, 09:44:36 PM »
Or we can get four so they put in Colome to make it interesting so they need to bring in Joel and then he blows it. That's the Nationals' Way.

You forgot the part about where we load the bases in the bottom of the ninth, with no outs, but fail to score a run.

Offline PC

  • Posts: 41575
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #342: June 05, 2009, 09:44:55 PM »
...and Guzman will STILL be below the Mendoza line by July.  Bank on it!

Offline shoeshineboy

  • Posts: 7449
  • Walks Kill!! Walks Kill! Walks Kill!!!!
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #343: June 05, 2009, 09:44:56 PM »
Guz getting back into a groove.

Offline nats2playoffs

  • Posts: 18228
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #344: June 05, 2009, 09:44:58 PM »


Guz 3-4 tonight, (now that I dumped him from my fantasy team.)

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 54704
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #345: June 05, 2009, 09:45:18 PM »
We're going to squander another leadoff runner.  :?

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 86983
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #346: June 05, 2009, 09:45:34 PM »
I don't understand why you wouldn't bunt right there with Wright playing back so far.

Offline skippy1999

  • Posts: 6437
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #347: June 05, 2009, 09:45:36 PM »
Biemel is fairly reliable as against lefties. He's always been more of a situational 1 or 2 batter guy. Acta's misused him on more than one occasion.

I think he's misused him when he makes him go more than one inning, but when he was with the Dodgers before Torre he was used for usually one inning and he did fine.  No more than that, though.  Ever.

Online tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 28361
  • Hell yes!
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #348: June 05, 2009, 09:45:42 PM »
(Image removed from quote.)

Guz 3-4 tonight, (now that I dumped him from my fantasy team.)


I benched him too.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 54704
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #349: June 05, 2009, 09:45:57 PM »
...and Guzman will STILL be below the Mendoza line by July.  Bank on it!

That's too broad because you could technically wait until the 31st and still be right. Care to set a date?