Author Topic: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3  (Read 10091 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 30122
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #725: May 28, 2009, 10:14:10 AM »
You are going crazy.  There was no dent in the sign because the ball did not hit the sign. 

Subway NEEDS to make a commercial out of that footage.  Can you imagine the publicity they could reap from this?

Nobody cares about the Nationals.

Offline Minty Fresh

  • Posts: 16833
  • Mantra of the SSS
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #726: May 28, 2009, 10:33:05 AM »
Nobody cares about the Nationals.

Then... why are we here?   ;)

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 30122
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #727: May 28, 2009, 10:33:36 AM »
Then... why are we here?   ;)

I meant nobody who would eat at Subway :P

Offline DPMOmaha

  • Posts: 18213
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #728: May 28, 2009, 10:39:51 AM »
I meant nobody who would eat at Subway :P
Jimmy Johns.  FTW!

Online blue911

  • Posts: 16583
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #729: May 28, 2009, 10:43:14 AM »
I meant nobody who would eat at Subway :P

I worry about a place that tells you how MUCH food you get and not how GOOD the food is.

Online blue911

  • Posts: 16583
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #730: May 28, 2009, 10:45:12 AM »
Come to think of it, why would you advertise that you can lose weight faster than a 17 year old bulimic?

Offline Minty Fresh

  • Posts: 16833
  • Mantra of the SSS
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #731: May 28, 2009, 11:13:26 AM »
I meant nobody who would eat at Subway :P

And I meant in the greater sense:  "why are we here?"

I was trying to go existential.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 54502
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #732: May 28, 2009, 11:15:16 AM »
How did you NOT make a Debbi Taylor avatar?  The situation was BEGGING for spidey to have to take a DT avatar.

Unfortunately, in the unlikely event that the Nats had won, and since I have no photoshop skills, I would've had to rely on sportsfan to photoshop a pic for his own humiliating avatar?  :?

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 30122
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #733: May 28, 2009, 11:18:49 AM »
Unfortunately, in the unlikely event that the Nats had won, and since I have no photoshop skills, I would've had to rely on sportsfan to photoshop a pic for his own humiliating avatar?  :?

You could hit me up, I'm not too bad with the 'shop.  Lastings Thrilledge is good too.

You should get sportsfan to go double or nothing next time ;)

Offline Minty Fresh

  • Posts: 16833
  • Mantra of the SSS
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #734: May 28, 2009, 11:29:17 AM »
Unfortunately, in the unlikely event that the Nats had won, and since I have no photoshop skills, I would've had to rely on sportsfan to photoshop a pic for his own humiliating avatar?  :?

My question was directed at sportsfan, though.  He could've made you have a DT avatar.

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 30122
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #735: May 28, 2009, 11:34:19 AM »
He should've worked "freaking awesome guy" into the avatar somehow.  Or told spider to make that his subtitle ;)

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 86602
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #736: May 28, 2009, 12:19:13 PM »
You are going crazy.  There was no dent in the sign because the ball did not hit the sign. 

Subway NEEDS to make a commercial out of that footage.  Can you imagine the publicity they could reap from this?
QFT. There's no dent in the sign because the ball never hit it.

I was thinking of giving Spider a Dukes/AZ or Debbi Taylor avatar but since I don't have pshop right now my options were limited.

Offline JMUalumni

  • Posts: 7789
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #737: May 28, 2009, 12:27:10 PM »
Jimmy Johns.  FTW!

This, I ate JJs for a year straight down at college.  #5 and #11 FTW!

Offline DPMOmaha

  • Posts: 18213
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #738: May 28, 2009, 12:29:35 PM »
This, I ate JJs for a year straight down at college.  #5 and #11 FTW!
16 with cheese and avacado, no tomatos. 

If you want a taste explosion, go for the Gargantuian.  It'll take you a week to eat, but holy cow, amazingness.

Offline JMUalumni

  • Posts: 7789
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #739: May 28, 2009, 12:32:22 PM »
16 with cheese and avacado, no tomatos. 

If you want a taste explosion, go for the Gargantuian.  It'll take you a week to eat, but holy cow, amazingness.

The Gargantuian is pretty damn good, but it so big.  My former roommate, who is somewhat of a circus act when it comes to eating food, used to down one in a single sitting.  I, on the other hand, got a few meals out of that sucker.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 54502
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #740: May 28, 2009, 12:49:39 PM »
My question was directed at sportsfan, though.  He could've made you have a DT avatar.

I was expecting as much but I got skated by. At least I believed in my team.  :?

He should've worked "freaking awesome guy" into the avatar somehow.  Or told spider to make that his subtitle ;)

We actually had, at least I thought we did, a gentleman's agreement that this could not be used but it looks like sportsfan would've dogged me even worse if not for his not having photoshop.  :?  I should go ahead and post what I had lined up for him if the Nats had won just for that.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37061
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday