Author Topic: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3  (Read 14746 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93412
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #700: May 27, 2009, 10:50:42 PM »
no i think he's just mad.  or pissed.  or angry.  8)

all 3 but these losses don't infuriate me like they did earlier in the season. They are a lot easier to take if you expect a loss every game.

wins are gravy

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 35009
  • Next year, maybe?
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #701: May 27, 2009, 10:54:12 PM »
'interesting roster move'

Hmm. I wonder if it's something we haven't heard yet.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37293
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #702: May 27, 2009, 10:55:33 PM »
'interesting roster move'

Hmm. I wonder if it's something we haven't heard yet.

Montz down, MacDougal up - don't hold your breath . . .

Offline nats2playoffs

  • Posts: 20165
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #703: May 27, 2009, 10:55:36 PM »
darnIT! I thought Johnny said "Manny was fired tonight".
Sadly he said "Manny was wired tonight".


Instead of wiring a Natinals player on "Wired Wednesday", the LAST TWO weeks have been Acta. 
He clearly sees the handwriting on the wall...


Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93412
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #704: May 27, 2009, 10:57:53 PM »
why the F are we still carrying 8 relievers? MacDougal is nothing special.

get rid of wells or colome please.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37378
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #705: May 27, 2009, 10:58:19 PM »
haha ray ... mcgeary is nowhere close to getting a call up, smoker hasn't even pitched in pro ball this season, chico is still rehabbing.  he's right about balester though.  he's the next call up when a starter is needed.

Offline UMDNats

  • Posts: 13122
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #706: May 27, 2009, 10:59:21 PM »
mike macdougal is here to save us, woo hoo

Offline Nathan

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 10720
  • Wow. Such warnings. Very baseball. Moderator Doge.
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #707: May 27, 2009, 11:00:03 PM »
why the F are we still carrying 8 relievers? MacDougal is nothing special.

get rid of wells or colome please.
QFT.  Wells, Colome, and Tavarez are all worthless.

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 35009
  • Next year, maybe?
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #708: May 27, 2009, 11:01:02 PM »
I hope they post what I wrote on MASN. They usually do. I was pretty strong in my dislike of MacDougal.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 63100
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #709: May 27, 2009, 11:01:40 PM »
OK so sportsfan dogged me on our bet. But never let it be said spidey doesn't man up and take his medicine.  :?

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37378
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #710: May 27, 2009, 11:02:01 PM »
hahahahahaha manny acta says "well something has to be done, this is getting ridiculous" ... THEN WHY DON'T YOU GO OUT AND VOICE YOUR OPINION. 

wow he's clueless. 

can we please bring in a veteran manager that knows how to manage a baseball team?

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93412
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #711: May 27, 2009, 11:02:17 PM »
after watching the replay again, that ball did not hit the sign. was not a HR. complete bullcrap

Offline nats2playoffs

  • Posts: 20165
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #712: May 27, 2009, 11:09:05 PM »
OK so sportsfan dogged me on our bet. But never let it be said spidey doesn't man up and take his medicine.  :?




 :worship:  :pimp:

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37293
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #713: May 27, 2009, 11:15:12 PM »
OK so sportsfan dogged me on our bet. But never let it be said spidey doesn't man up and take his medicine.  :?


When your sentence is complete, you could change it to "Belly of the Beast"


Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93412
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #714: May 27, 2009, 11:21:01 PM »
Did we really get swept by the Mets who were playing without Reyes, Delgado, Beltran, and Church?


Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23263
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #715: May 27, 2009, 11:25:43 PM »
Btw, that ball DEFINITELY hit the sign. If you watch the replay again, you'll see the ball knocked something off of it. I knew I wasn't going crazy.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93412
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #716: May 27, 2009, 11:29:40 PM »
Btw, that ball DEFINITELY hit the sign. If you watch the replay again, you'll see the ball knocked something off of it. I knew I wasn't going crazy.
no no no no. someone dropped something from the section above the subway sign.

Offline JMUalumni

  • Posts: 7789
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #717: May 27, 2009, 11:41:48 PM »
no no no no. someone dropped something from the section above the subway sign.

yeah, I am pretty sure someone dropped/threw something onto the field.

Offline ColtonWillems

  • Posts: 1125
  • "You have no integrity"
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #718: May 28, 2009, 12:30:02 AM »
I was at the game again tonight. Apparently I'm horrible luck?

You all might as well not watch the 6/16 game against the Yankees because I'll be there too.

That Murphy home run was IMPOSSIBLE to tell at the game, but I knew it was gone the way Dunn was retreating on the ball, it was a dead giveaway.

Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23263
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #719: May 28, 2009, 12:41:14 AM »
no no no no. someone dropped something from the section above the subway sign.

There was also a big dent in the sign.

Offline Senators2005

  • Lake Ridge, VA
  • Posts: 12263
  • Go Natsssssss!
    • http://nationalsnation.spaces.live.com/
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #720: May 28, 2009, 01:41:07 AM »
I was at the game again tonight. Apparently I'm horrible luck?
No, this team is just horrible.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93412
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #721: May 28, 2009, 07:06:11 AM »
Quote
ADAM DUNN

Q: What did the ball do?

I didn't think there was any way possible that ball could have been a homer. What would have been interesting -- I probably should have caught that ball. Then I would have liked to see what the verdict would have been then.

Q: What did you see?

Well, I was playing in, so I was kind of running back, and when I did, I thought it would have been a homer. But it didn't hit the [overhang], so I picked it up and threw it to our cut-off man.

Q: So when you were looking at it, was it close to scraping the Subway sign or not even?

I guess five feet close. Is five feet close?

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 63100
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #722: May 28, 2009, 09:26:32 AM »
Did we really get swept by the Mets who were playing without Reyes, Delgado, Beltran, and Church?

(Image removed from quote.)


And we have next Wednesday to look forward to when the Giants come to town with a chance for Randy Johnson to record his 300th victory.  :?  And what better team for the Giants to celebrate another milestone against than the Washington Nationals.  :bang:

But that could be good news for guys like az, houston-nat, soxnats and others who don't get to see the Nats regularly because it may mean that ESPN or MLB Network will pick up the game.

Offline Minty Fresh

  • Posts: 18850
  • Go Bears!
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #723: May 28, 2009, 10:00:53 AM »


How did you NOT make a Debbi Taylor avatar?  The situation was BEGGING for spidey to have to take a DT avatar.

Offline Minty Fresh

  • Posts: 18850
  • Go Bears!
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #724: May 28, 2009, 10:01:57 AM »
There was also a big dent in the sign.

You are going crazy.  There was no dent in the sign because the ball did not hit the sign. 

Subway NEEDS to make a commercial out of that footage.  Can you imagine the publicity they could reap from this?