Author Topic: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3  (Read 9953 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37010
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #650: May 27, 2009, 10:22:07 PM »
grand slam please wright.  i have you on my fantasy team and joel hanrahan is garbage.  no pressure situation and he still blows. 

This is why I hate fantasy sports. Even at this point I wouldn't want him to get a GS.

Offline LetsGoNats

  • Posts: 1594
  • We're Nat Gonna Take It!
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #651: May 27, 2009, 10:23:42 PM »
Look on the bright side, at least no Mets fan needs to beat his mom to death since the Mets are about to sweep us.

Online Minty Fresh

  • Posts: 16222
  • ALL WAYS ARE MY WAYS!
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #652: May 27, 2009, 10:24:49 PM »
you can say that again.

Hanrahan makes it interesting but wiggles out.

 :icon_mrgreen:

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37344
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #653: May 27, 2009, 10:24:54 PM »
This is why I hate fantasy sports. Even at this point I wouldn't want him to get a GS.

i was half kidding.  good to see hanrahan pull out of that, but still, too close for comfort.  even if it's a 4 run game.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37344
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #654: May 27, 2009, 10:25:12 PM »
nieves being nieves

Offline LetsGoNats

  • Posts: 1594
  • We're Nat Gonna Take It!
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #655: May 27, 2009, 10:25:16 PM »
Tonight will make it more than 80 straight games we have lost when trailing entering the 9th.  That's amazing.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37344
  • LAC 8)

Online sportsfan882

  • Posts: 83602
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #657: May 27, 2009, 10:25:30 PM »
4-19 without Flores behind the plate. Dagger.

9-14 with him.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37010
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #658: May 27, 2009, 10:25:31 PM »
:rofl: at the replay of Zambrano "ejecting" the umpire.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37344
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #659: May 27, 2009, 10:26:08 PM »
OMG I would throw a party Thursday night if Manny Acta got canned tonight or tomorrow.

:pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray:
:pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray:

Online spidernat

  • Posts: 52181
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #660: May 27, 2009, 10:26:26 PM »
Care to submit your suggestions via PM sportsfan?

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37344
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #661: May 27, 2009, 10:26:40 PM »
4-19 without Flores behind the plate. Dagger.

9-14 with him.

NOW YOU'VE HEARD OF WIL NIEVES!!!

Offline LetsGoNats

  • Posts: 1594
  • We're Nat Gonna Take It!
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #662: May 27, 2009, 10:26:41 PM »
This is why I hate fantasy sports. Even at this point I wouldn't want him to get a GS.
I know what you mean.  I play in a fantasy league and I needed to pick up a SS this week due to a couple injuries.  FLop was available and probably the best option, but I refused to pick him up b/c I can't stomach pulling for the guy on any level.

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 33572
  • Lets go to work
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #663: May 27, 2009, 10:27:03 PM »
Was that Luke Montz clapping?

Kid looks like he's the only one into the game.

Online spidernat

  • Posts: 52181
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #664: May 27, 2009, 10:27:13 PM »
OMG I would throw a party Thursday night if Manny Acta got canned tonight or tomorrow.


Why not throw one anyway? Invite Dukes and AZ and one of them will cum.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37344
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #665: May 27, 2009, 10:27:43 PM »
Why not throw one anyway? Invite Dukes and AZ and one of them will cum.

:rofl:

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 27275
  • Hell yes!
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #666: May 27, 2009, 10:27:52 PM »
Carpenter thinks baseball has some explaining to do.  I think that baseball will have no comment whatsoever. 

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37344
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #667: May 27, 2009, 10:28:10 PM »
should've let montz pinch hit

Online spidernat

  • Posts: 52181
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #668: May 27, 2009, 10:28:13 PM »
The Mets just    on the Nats.  :?

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37010
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #669: May 27, 2009, 10:28:30 PM »
Why do the Mets fans even care? We owned Santana and blew the game.

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 33572
  • Lets go to work
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #670: May 27, 2009, 10:28:34 PM »
Without a doubt tom.

Offline Senators2005

  • Lake Ridge, VA
  • Posts: 12261
  • Go Natsssssss!
    • http://nationalsnation.spaces.live.com/
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #671: May 27, 2009, 10:28:46 PM »
Either the Lerners are retards or Manny Acta has impregnated his daughter - what in the world could be keeping him here?!?!? 

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37010
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #672: May 27, 2009, 10:29:22 PM »
Either the Lerners are retards or Manny Acta has impregnated his daughter - what in the world could be keeping him here?!?!? 

It's Rizzo's call - sheesh

Online spidernat

  • Posts: 52181
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #673: May 27, 2009, 10:29:26 PM »
There is still a glimmer of hope!

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37344
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #674: May 27, 2009, 10:29:29 PM »
i'm watching a movie so please pm me or start a new post in caps letters letting me know if we somehow got rid of manny acta or made a shocking move.

at least balester and martin had good games.