Author Topic: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3  (Read 10222 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline GburgNatsFan

  • Posts: 12890
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #575: May 27, 2009, 09:56:51 PM »
Yeah, I think you are right. That ball looked like it caromed. That's a giveaway.

Ha ha. The guy that just scored is named Angel Pagan. His folks must have had a sense of humor.
There is no way that ball didn't hit anything. I think it nicked the edge of the sign and shot straight down.

Offline GburgNatsFan

  • Posts: 12890
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #576: May 27, 2009, 09:57:23 PM »
From right? :)
Kearns would have made that play too.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37074
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #577: May 27, 2009, 09:57:59 PM »
Colome is the opposite of a good reliever. All of his inherited runners scored :hang:

Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23233
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #578: May 27, 2009, 09:58:25 PM »
There is no way that ball didn't hit anything. I think it nicked the edge of the sign and shot straight down.

I think it actually knocked something off of the sign.

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 33991
  • Next year, maybe?
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #579: May 27, 2009, 09:58:35 PM »
See this sucks.

Colome gets a scoreless inning for being complete crap.

Manny will praise him.

Offline nats2playoffs

  • Posts: 18228
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #580: May 27, 2009, 09:58:50 PM »
(Image removed from quote.)




They're always going to boo a broadcaster from the opposing team.  But the Mets fans were ALL posing and waving, to get on TV. 

 
At least we have kimnat insider assistance, to give DebbiTaylor something productive to report.  Don't let them get away with this BIAS!

natinals 3
metssuck 7


FIRE ACTA AND CLAIRE TONIGHT

Offline MDoyle

  • Posts: 654
  • UMW 2010
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #581: May 27, 2009, 09:59:04 PM »
This is one of the most infuriating series I've ever watched.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37074
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #582: May 27, 2009, 09:59:41 PM »
What did kim tell bob to report?

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 28361
  • Hell yes!
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #583: May 27, 2009, 09:59:53 PM »
There is no way that ball didn't hit anything. I think it nicked the edge of the sign and shot straight down.

There's no way this is true.  The ball caromed off the ground towards the wall, overwhelming evidence that it was headed in that direction before hitting the ground.  If it had bounced towards Dunn, it would have indicated  it was coming towards DUnn because it had already bounced off the sign.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 54704
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #584: May 27, 2009, 10:00:03 PM »
It's a good thing sportsfan didn't accept my wager.  :lol:

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 86983
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #585: May 27, 2009, 10:01:09 PM »
There's no way this is true.  The ball caromed off the ground towards the wall, overwhelming evidence that it was headed in that direction before hitting the ground.  If it had bounced towards Dunn, it would have indicated  it was coming towards DUnn because it had already bounced off the sign.
WIN

Offline PC

  • Posts: 41575
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #586: May 27, 2009, 10:01:58 PM »
From right? :)

In a similar play...on the other side of the field!  :P

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 54704
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #587: May 27, 2009, 10:02:15 PM »
There's no way this is true.  The ball caromed off the ground towards the wall, overwhelming evidence that it was headed in that direction before hitting the ground.  If it had bounced towards Dunn, it would have indicated  it was coming towards DUnn because it had already bounced off the sign.

I don't think it bounced off. I said it could have just barely nicked the EDGE of the sign causing it to shoot straight down. That would also explain why none of the fans in the area heard a sound.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 86983
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #588: May 27, 2009, 10:02:37 PM »
Mets pitchers walk so many batters. it's crazy

Offline GburgNatsFan

  • Posts: 12890
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #589: May 27, 2009, 10:03:18 PM »
I was just, you know, sensing a theme. :)
In a similar play...on the other side of the field!  :P

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 33991
  • Next year, maybe?
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #590: May 27, 2009, 10:04:11 PM »
Ronnie really doesn't look like he gives a crap.

Offline LetsGoNats

  • Posts: 1594
  • We're Nat Gonna Take It!
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #591: May 27, 2009, 10:04:36 PM »
Nice GIDP ronnie

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 86983
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #592: May 27, 2009, 10:04:49 PM »
thanks for giving Belliard the start, Manny Acta. omg. how freaking dumb can he get.

Belliard should be released.

Offline Senators2005

  • Lake Ridge, VA
  • Posts: 12261
  • Go Natsssssss!
    • http://nationalsnation.spaces.live.com/
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #593: May 27, 2009, 10:04:50 PM »
We've just been Puttzed   :?

Offline HerndonNat

  • Posts: 520
    • FSU Football
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #594: May 27, 2009, 10:04:51 PM »
Belliard really knocked the hell out of that one.

Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23233
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #595: May 27, 2009, 10:04:57 PM »
There's no way this is true.  The ball caromed off the ground towards the wall, overwhelming evidence that it was headed in that direction before hitting the ground.  If it had bounced towards Dunn, it would have indicated  it was coming towards DUnn because it had already bounced off the sign.

That's what I was thinking earlier, but in the last replay I saw it looked like the ball knocked something off of the sign. I might've just been seeing things, though.

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 28361
  • Hell yes!
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #596: May 27, 2009, 10:05:11 PM »
I don't think it bounced off. I said it could have just barely nicked the EDGE of the sign causing it to shoot straight down. That would also explain why none of the fans in the area heard a sound.

It did NOT bounce straight down.  It was still on a vector towards the fence, but landed short of the fence/wall.  To me, the ball was visible headed down, but well short of the Subway sign.  We got totally jobbed again.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 86983
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #597: May 27, 2009, 10:05:18 PM »
Why didn't Harris PH for Belliard instead of Maxwell??!

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 54704
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #598: May 27, 2009, 10:05:23 PM »
Belliard is batting .164  :shock:

Offline LetsGoNats

  • Posts: 1594
  • We're Nat Gonna Take It!
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #599: May 27, 2009, 10:05:24 PM »
There have only been 9 worse managers than Manny in the history of MLB