Author Topic: Nationals @ Giants, Game 2  (Read 8367 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline JMW IV

  • Posts: 11276
  • Name on the Front > Name on The Back
Re: Nationals @ Giants, Game 2
« Reply #50: May 12, 2009, 04:28:08 PM »
It doesn't matter who make's the Game Thread, it has no effect on the outcome of the game.

well yeah. 

but it's a community-building exercise.

also this way SF can't whine at 2k6 about it for the rest of his life.

Offline JMW IV

  • Posts: 11276
  • Name on the Front > Name on The Back
Re: Nationals @ Giants, Game 2
« Reply #51: May 12, 2009, 04:28:48 PM »
exactly, but some people on here just like to nag just to nag. 

yep. like everyone who naged just to nag when 2k6 started the threads. :?

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37347
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals @ Giants, Game 2
« Reply #52: May 12, 2009, 04:29:53 PM »
yep. like everyone who naged just to nag when 2k6 started the threads. :?

i like 2k6, we're in charge of YNOT, so i'm cool with him. 

on the days that i have started the thread i have seen that there was no thread started and i had free time so i went ahead and made threads.  it just so happens the nats haven't lost in gameday threads that i started.

hell last week we were down 6-0 and i was sure as hell we would lose that one. 

Offline Minty Fresh

  • Posts: 16335
  • GOOOOOOOOOOD MORNIN' VIETNAM!
Re: Nationals @ Giants, Game 2
« Reply #53: May 12, 2009, 04:30:59 PM »
It doesn't matter who make's the Game Thread, it has no effect on the outcome of the game.

I had a friend growing up who actually believed the outcome of Red Sox games hinged on his positioning in his lazy-boy.  He had to sit one leg folded under, remote in right hand (even though he never changed the channel) and beverage of choice in his left hand.  He believed it.  That's all that mattered.

Some people have stupid superstitions but the bottom line is they're their superstitions.

Offline eckseid

  • Posts: 854
Re: Nationals @ Giants, Game 2
« Reply #54: May 12, 2009, 04:32:47 PM »
I had a friend growing up who actually believed the outcome of Red Sox games hinged on his positioning in his lazy-boy.  He had to sit one leg folded under, remote in right hand (even though he never changed the channel) and beverage of choice in his left hand.  He believed it.  That's all that mattered.

Some people have stupid superstitions but the bottom line is they're their superstitions.

Great, but constantly nagging at 2k6 because the Nats lose when he makes the GDT gets freaking old.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37347
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals @ Giants, Game 2
« Reply #55: May 12, 2009, 04:33:39 PM »
I had a friend growing up who actually believed the outcome of Red Sox games hinged on his positioning in his lazy-boy.  He had to sit one leg folded under, remote in right hand (even though he never changed the channel) and beverage of choice in his left hand.  He believed it.  That's all that mattered.

Some people have stupid superstitions but the bottom line is they're their superstitions.

hahahaha really?  that is crazy.

i'm pretty superstitious but not that bad haha.

Offline blue911

  • Posts: 16245
Re: Nationals @ Giants, Game 2
« Reply #56: May 12, 2009, 04:35:57 PM »
Great, but constantly nagging at 2k6 because the Nats lose when he makes the GDT gets freaking old.


Offline DPMOmaha

  • Posts: 17904
Re: Nationals @ Giants, Game 2
« Reply #57: May 12, 2009, 04:43:03 PM »
I had a friend growing up who actually believed the outcome of Red Sox games hinged on his positioning in his lazy-boy.  He had to sit one leg folded under, remote in right hand (even though he never changed the channel) and beverage of choice in his left hand.  He believed it.  That's all that mattered.

Some people have stupid superstitions but the bottom line is they're their superstitions.
I know none of that matters and has no impact on the games but it doesn't stop me from doing some of those things.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 85082
Re: Nationals @ Giants, Game 2
« Reply #58: May 12, 2009, 05:04:16 PM »
simple rules.

1) You make the Game Thread. If you win, you make the next game thread.
2) You keep making the Game Thread every game until you lose, REGARDLESS OF WHO IS PITCHING.
3) When you lose, someone else makes the next game thread.


WIN

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 53228
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Giants, Game 2
« Reply #59: May 12, 2009, 06:09:42 PM »
exactly, but some people on here just like to nag just to nag. 

But most of the nagging that sparked all this to begin with came from people who naged about 2K6 being the jinx that was causing the Nats' losing streak.  :?

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 30003
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Nationals @ Giants, Game 2
« Reply #60: May 12, 2009, 06:29:34 PM »
But most of the nagging that sparked all this to begin with came from people who naged about 2K6 being the jinx that was causing the Nats' losing streak.  :?

you know spider, you may be a :stir: but at least you're impartial.  I like that about you.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37347
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals @ Giants, Game 2
« Reply #61: May 12, 2009, 06:34:06 PM »
you know spider annie savoy, you may be a :stir: but at least you're impartial.  I like that about you.

fixed, but no you're right chief. 

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 30003
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Nationals @ Giants, Game 2
« Reply #62: May 12, 2009, 06:34:57 PM »
fixed, but no you're right chief. 


That's pretty random.  Annie hasn't been here in ages.

Last online October of '08.

And she has a blog - http://shelleyschalet.blogspot.com/

It's not spider, sheesh.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37010
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals @ Giants, Game 2
« Reply #63: May 12, 2009, 06:46:41 PM »
That's pretty random.  Annie hasn't been here in ages.

Last online October of '08.

And she has a blog - http://shelleyschalet.blogspot.com/

It's not spider, sheesh.


I know because spider is PebbleBall :rofl:

Just kidding. Or am I.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37347
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals @ Giants, Game 2
« Reply #64: May 12, 2009, 07:06:12 PM »
ight i've got company for the night but i'll be watching ... go nats.

Offline Senators2005

  • Lake Ridge, VA
  • Posts: 12261
  • Go Natsssssss!
    • http://nationalsnation.spaces.live.com/
Re: Nationals @ Giants, Game 2
« Reply #65: May 12, 2009, 07:14:48 PM »
Wow three pages on the gameday thread and the game doesn't even start for three hours.   :D

Offline cmdterps44

  • Posts: 15528
  • Future
Re: Nationals @ Giants, Game 2
« Reply #66: May 12, 2009, 07:20:07 PM »
Guys, i have something to tell you...


I AM SPIDERNAT

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37010
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals @ Giants, Game 2
« Reply #67: May 12, 2009, 07:20:47 PM »
I AM IRON MAN

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 85082
Re: Nationals @ Giants, Game 2
« Reply #68: May 12, 2009, 08:02:02 PM »
SOB. Flores still out. :(

Guzman - SS
Johnson - 1B
Zimmerman - 3B
Dunn - LF
Dukes - CF
Kearns - RF
Hernandez - 2B
Nieves - C
Zimmermann - P


Burriss - 2B
Renteria - SS
Sandoval - 3B
Molina - C
Winn - LF
Rowand - CF
Ishikawa - 1B
Schierholtz - RF
Cain - P

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 30003
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Nationals @ Giants, Game 2
« Reply #69: May 12, 2009, 08:05:42 PM »
Well at least Hernandez is back.

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 27609
  • Hell yes!
Re: Nationals @ Giants, Game 2
« Reply #70: May 12, 2009, 08:06:23 PM »


I've never known blue to be speechless before.

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 27609
  • Hell yes!
Re: Nationals @ Giants, Game 2
« Reply #71: May 12, 2009, 08:09:27 PM »
simple rules.

1) You make the Game Thread. If you win, you make the next game thread.
2) You keep making the Game Thread every game until you lose, REGARDLESS OF WHO IS PITCHING.
3) When you lose, someone else makes the next game thread.



But, according to sportsfan, the more you win, the greater your chances of losing are for the next one.  In other words, somebody who starts and wins 10 consecutive threads, is more likely to lose the 11th, than somebody who had lost 10 consecutive threads.         

Therefore, we should always go with the loser, not the winner.                   :icon_mrgreen:

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 27609
  • Hell yes!
Re: Nationals @ Giants, Game 2
« Reply #72: May 12, 2009, 08:10:08 PM »
Well at least Hernandez is back.

That lineup with Cullen, Brinkman et al was pretty darn productive.

Offline Air Zimmerman

  • Posts: 7179
  • best 3b in the business
Re: Nationals @ Giants, Game 2
« Reply #73: May 12, 2009, 08:12:52 PM »
alright, with Cabrera's start out of the way, i think we can win the next 2. Jay-Z got hit a bit in his last couple starts, but he'll get back on track tonight.

LET'S GO NATS!!!

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 53228
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Giants, Game 2
« Reply #74: May 12, 2009, 09:33:39 PM »
fixed, but no you're right chief. 

That was kind of funny.

I know because spider is PebbleBall :rofl:

Just kidding. Or am I.

Who is PebbleBall? Is that the chick sportsfan spotted at the game with the nice rack?

Guys, i have something to tell you...


I AM SPIDERNAT


:rofl:  Awesome!  :clap: