Author Topic: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1  (Read 5032 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline eagleskins

  • BANNED FOREVER
  • Posts: 2946
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #300: April 24, 2009, 10:36:11 PM »
Hernandez has got to go.  No reason for this bum to be on a roster. 

Offline Nathan

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 10690
  • Wow. Such warnings. Very baseball. Moderator Doge.
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #301: April 24, 2009, 10:36:42 PM »
That's the spirit!
What is it with you and staring randomly at pitchers butts and wanting to see them get pounded  :lol:

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 86608
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #302: April 24, 2009, 10:37:35 PM »
I honestly believe that this team would be over .500 by now were it not for Manny's dumb ass calls.
they would definitely have 7-8 wins right now. no doubt about it. this is the best team we have ever had in Nats history and yet we are 3-12. It doesn't add up.


Since April 13th our starters have had combined for a 3.13 ERA:

5 IP 6 H 4 R 1 ER 2 BB 2 K 1 HR
6.1 IP 5 H 2 R 2 ER 2 BB 1 K 0 HR
6.1 IP 3 H 1 R 1 ER 1 BB 8 K 1 HR
7 IP 6 H 3 R 2 ER 1 BB 5 K 1 HR
5 IP 3 H 2 R 2 ER 4 BB 0 K 0 HR
6 IP 6 H 2 R 2 ER 1 BB 3 K 1 HR
6 IP 6 H 3 R 2 ER 4 BB 2 K 0 HR
7 IP 5 H 0 R 0 ER 2 BB 4 K 0 HR
6 IP 9 H 3 R 2 ER 2 BB 4 K 0 HR
------------------------------------
54.2 IP 49 H 19 R 14 ER 19 BB 29 K 4 HR (3-1, 3.13 ERA, 1.24 WHIP)

Offline KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 14352
  • Nats hitters = Maggie Lizer
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #303: April 24, 2009, 10:37:53 PM »
Hernandez has got to go.  No reason for this bum to be on a roster. 
There is where I will agree with you.

Why couldn't we go after Orlando Hudson?  I warned people about relying on Anderson.

Offline KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 14352
  • Nats hitters = Maggie Lizer
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #304: April 24, 2009, 10:38:46 PM »
Nice stat, SF.  Where did you get that?

That's INSANELY GOOD SP.  Only Acta could keep them down like this.

Offline skippy1999

  • Posts: 6040
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #305: April 24, 2009, 10:39:33 PM »
What is it with you and staring randomly at pitchers butts and wanting to see them get pounded  :lol:

Ok now that was funny!

Offline KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 14352
  • Nats hitters = Maggie Lizer
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #306: April 24, 2009, 10:42:50 PM »
"Pretty much everything we wanted to do, except win the ballgame."

Ugh, this is why I don't listen to Acta's post-game pressers.  THAT'S ALL THAT MATTERS YOU FOOL!

And he can sit there and say with a straight face that he's satisfied with his fielding?  That's what you wanted to do?  Field like that.

Oh yeah, I forgot that he doesn't give a crap about fielding.  It's pretty obvious. :?

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 86608
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #307: April 24, 2009, 10:43:35 PM »
Nice stat, SF.  Where did you get that?

That's INSANELY GOOD SP.  Only Acta could keep them down like this.
calculated it myself. notice the 3-1 record too. astonishing. Over that same 9 game stretch of games our bullpen has a record of 0-5.

Offline KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 14352
  • Nats hitters = Maggie Lizer
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #308: April 24, 2009, 10:43:46 PM »
Ray Knight is ripping him a new one :D

I think he's losing on purpose at this point

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 86608
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #309: April 24, 2009, 10:53:23 PM »
this is so sick.

During the first week and a half of the season we were getting solid offensive production and decent pitching from the relief corps but terrible pitching from our starters. Now, over the last 2 weeks we have gotten phenomenal starting pitching and our relief pitching has been atrocious and our offense has started to sputter.

Offline Nathan

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 10690
  • Wow. Such warnings. Very baseball. Moderator Doge.
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #310: April 24, 2009, 10:58:30 PM »
I'm not a superstitious person, but it does seem like this team is cursed.  Cursed with the worst manager in the MLB maybe.

Offline skippy1999

  • Posts: 6040
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #311: April 24, 2009, 10:59:45 PM »
They can't even take fielding practice tomorrow because of the early start :(

Offline PC

  • Posts: 41166
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #312: April 25, 2009, 12:06:34 AM »
Why couldn't we go after Orlando Hudson?  I warned people about relying on Anderson.

My guess is money.  :?

Offline cmdterps44

  • Posts: 15536
  • Future
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #313: April 25, 2009, 03:43:08 AM »
Orlando Hudson would've been our greatest acquisition. With him in the lineup and Guzman, wed have a pretty damn good offense. Look at him and what hes doing with the dodgers right now.

Our bullpen is some serious crap. Today, walking batters, letting runs in, its getting old. Who knows if Flores woulda hit that 2 run bomb after the 3 walks by bergmann and whatever happened (turned the channel for a sec and missed what happened) but it sucks we have to see that every night.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37353
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #314: April 25, 2009, 09:59:52 AM »
Orlando Hudson would've been our greatest acquisition. With him in the lineup and Guzman, wed have a pretty damn good offense. Look at him and what hes doing with the dodgers right now.

Our bullpen is some serious crap. Today, walking batters, letting runs in, its getting old. Who knows if Flores woulda hit that 2 run bomb after the 3 walks by bergmann and whatever happened (turned the channel for a sec and missed what happened) but it sucks we have to see that every night.

orlando hudson would be great ... but our owners are too cheap.

a solid bullpen would be great ... but our owners are too cheap.

hey at least we have alex cintron.  he comes cheap.

and :az: dukes was terrible on friday night absolutely pathetic.  good going flores though.