Author Topic: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1  (Read 4847 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline EmpireNat

  • Posts: 369
  • Hit 'em Hard
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #175: April 24, 2009, 08:48:41 PM »
Looking like a potentially pivotal inning if we can get back into the game!

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 83149
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #176: April 24, 2009, 08:48:45 PM »
good hit, AD :clap:

Offline PatsNats28

  • Posts: 8384
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #177: April 24, 2009, 08:48:46 PM »
This should be Santana's last inning; he's up next inning, and he should be +100 pitches after this inning.

Offline JMUalumni

  • Posts: 7789
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #178: April 24, 2009, 08:48:47 PM »
SHOOK UP!

Offline EmpireNat

  • Posts: 369
  • Hit 'em Hard
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #179: April 24, 2009, 08:49:49 PM »
Wow, we have to get something out of this, especially with none out, but how many times have we been here and been left pretty damn pissed off? Lets buck that trend!

Offline KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 13878
  • Lerners = Bluth family
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #180: April 24, 2009, 08:50:14 PM »
DUKES, YOU freakING IDIOT!

So lucky right there

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 83149
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #181: April 24, 2009, 08:50:17 PM »
freakin Dukes. why didn't Acta have him bunt there?!

Offline JMUalumni

  • Posts: 7789
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #182: April 24, 2009, 08:50:29 PM »
YES!  What a moron, how do you drop a pop up like that?

Offline KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 13878
  • Lerners = Bluth family
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #183: April 24, 2009, 08:50:52 PM »
freakin Dukes. why didn't Acta have him bunt there?!
He's too good of a hitter...

...normally.

But then he thinks he's freaking Vladimir Guerrero sometimes.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 83149
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #184: April 24, 2009, 08:52:00 PM »
awful. Dukes is incapable of hitting a fastball tonight

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37337
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #185: April 24, 2009, 08:52:34 PM »
glad to see elijah dukes has cooled off.  nice dukes.

Offline KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 13878
  • Lerners = Bluth family
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #186: April 24, 2009, 08:52:39 PM »
We will not get any additional runs in this innings.

Thanks a lot, Elijah!

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37337
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #187: April 24, 2009, 08:52:57 PM »
He's too good of a hitter...

...normally.


you nailed it on the head on that one.

Offline KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 13878
  • Lerners = Bluth family
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #188: April 24, 2009, 08:53:32 PM »
Kearns has a penchant for the DP so I'm not feeling too good right about now.

Offline mbeane19

  • Posts: 1028
  • I reserve the right to be wrong, always.
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #189: April 24, 2009, 08:53:50 PM »
Ugh...AK25 looks stupid again.

Offline PatsNats28

  • Posts: 8384
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #190: April 24, 2009, 08:54:34 PM »
according to gameday, all those pitches are outside the strike zone.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 83149
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #191: April 24, 2009, 08:54:56 PM »
this team is such a freaking joke. good job guys.

they just look like a bunch of losers the way they flail away at his pitches

Offline JMUalumni

  • Posts: 7789
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #192: April 24, 2009, 08:55:54 PM »
I very much dislike Austin Kearns, at least Dukes comes up in the clutch occasionally.  Kearns gets RBIs only when they don't matter...

Offline JMUalumni

  • Posts: 7789
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #193: April 24, 2009, 08:56:13 PM »
screw this crap, i finishing this one at the pub

Offline PatsNats28

  • Posts: 8384
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #194: April 24, 2009, 08:56:17 PM »
I very much dislike Austin Kearns

nice!

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 83149
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #195: April 24, 2009, 08:56:31 PM »
I hate this team.

at the very worst we should have tied it there and got Santana out of the game. pathetic.


Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37337
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #196: April 24, 2009, 08:57:41 PM »
haha dukes/kearns/flores thanks for coming out.  flores and dukes with runners in scoring position are a joke.  absolutely terrible. 

flores gotta be batting like .203 with RISP.  and dukes, seriously how many k's man?

santana isn't even pitching that well.  but dukes defense (and offense) plus kearns/flores offense just terrible tonight.  way to go.

Offline KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 13878
  • Lerners = Bluth family
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #197: April 24, 2009, 08:58:09 PM »
I want to break my freaking TV set right now as I'm watching this freaking MASN ad with this fat dorkass bragging about how the Nats knocked the Mets out of first last year as the Mets are currently tearing us a new ass.

Offline EmpireNat

  • Posts: 369
  • Hit 'em Hard
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #198: April 24, 2009, 08:59:43 PM »
I cannot believe how many men we leave on base. Every now and then can be put down to good pitching, but every day? why hasnt something been done about this?

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37337
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #199: April 24, 2009, 09:00:39 PM »
I cannot believe how many men we leave on base. Every now and then can be put down to good pitching, but every day? why hasnt something been done about this?

Jesus "LOB" Flores has your answer.