Author Topic: Nationals vs Braves, Game 3  (Read 19342 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Nationals vs Braves, Game 3
« Reply #350: April 22, 2009, 08:53:39 PM »
We actually had a chance to sweep a team and this is the performance we come out with...

Offline nats2playoffs

  • Posts: 21463
Re: Nationals vs Braves, Game 3
« Reply #351: April 22, 2009, 08:53:44 PM »
are you serious?  he would've been gunned out by a mile.  your boy failed to get the ball in the outfield.  he hit it hard, but not high and far.  nice going jesus.

Even Jesus gets crucified every now and then.  Actually it's good for bobblehead sales.


Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37378
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals vs Braves, Game 3
« Reply #352: April 22, 2009, 08:53:53 PM »
Psycho McCann at the dish.  I hope he isn't too mad about my avatar...

kawakami sees better than mccann.

Re: Nationals vs Braves, Game 3
« Reply #353: April 22, 2009, 08:54:03 PM »
Dibble is so into this game.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 66843
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals vs Braves, Game 3
« Reply #354: April 22, 2009, 08:54:09 PM »
Flores roped what would have been a single if the infielders weren't in. it was almost a single as it was


Offline KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 15291
  • Nats RP have no nerve
Re: Nationals vs Braves, Game 3
« Reply #355: April 22, 2009, 08:54:28 PM »
Who cares about whether he gets the win or not. What matters is that he did his job and kept the team in the game. As long as they win the game it's all good. But did you complain about Lannan's first two starts?
I think I remember him criticizing Lannan after that.

JMU is a very fair poster.  He's the least of our problems 'round here.

Offline Bags

  • Posts: 357
Re: Nationals vs Braves, Game 3
« Reply #356: April 22, 2009, 08:54:35 PM »
And Garrett makes a mockery out of the heart of the Braves order...    ;)

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93629
Re: Nationals vs Braves, Game 3
« Reply #357: April 22, 2009, 08:54:37 PM »
Excellent job, Garrett :clap:

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37397
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals vs Braves, Game 3
« Reply #358: April 22, 2009, 08:54:40 PM »
kawakami sees better than mccann.

Can't believe they are running him out there.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37378
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals vs Braves, Game 3
« Reply #359: April 22, 2009, 08:54:52 PM »
garrett mock = the closer

Offline UMDNats

  • Posts: 13518
  • hire a-rod
Re: Nationals vs Braves, Game 3
« Reply #360: April 22, 2009, 08:55:02 PM »
mock is money

Offline natsfan4evr

  • Posts: 6171
Re: Nationals vs Braves, Game 3
« Reply #361: April 22, 2009, 08:55:05 PM »
MOCK completely shut them down. Not even close.
Let's go ahead now and give the ball to Hanrahan.

GO NATS!

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37397
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals vs Braves, Game 3
« Reply #362: April 22, 2009, 08:55:21 PM »
garrett mock = the closer

Today it will probably be Saul :bang:

Offline eagleskins

  • BANNED FOREVER
  • Posts: 2946
Re: Nationals vs Braves, Game 3
« Reply #363: April 22, 2009, 08:55:38 PM »
Mock is money.  Glad to see him and Bergey up. 

Offline nats2playoffs

  • Posts: 21463
Re: Nationals vs Braves, Game 3
« Reply #364: April 22, 2009, 08:55:41 PM »
We're Mocking them...


Offline KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 15291
  • Nats RP have no nerve
Re: Nationals vs Braves, Game 3
« Reply #365: April 22, 2009, 08:56:11 PM »

Offline JMUalumni

  • Posts: 7789
Re: Nationals vs Braves, Game 3
« Reply #366: April 22, 2009, 08:56:42 PM »
Who cares about whether he gets the win or not. What matters is that he did his job and kept the team in the game. As long as they win the game it's all good. But did you complain about Lannan's first two starts?

Yeah I was mad as hell, because I knew he was better than that.  I don't like him for some boyish reason, I like him because I think he is a damn good pitcher.  Lannan gives them 7 innings of scoreless ball and they can't get a single run in, that is what I care about!  I don't care if he wins, I care if the freaking team wins and that is what I am referring to when I say he can't get a W or he gets a raw deal.  When a pitcher puts out a good performance, you hope the team can reciprocate at least half of the time and that just doesn't happen when Lannan pitches.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37397
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals vs Braves, Game 3
« Reply #367: April 22, 2009, 08:57:25 PM »
The Wizards are the team from DC playing the best today.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37378
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals vs Braves, Game 3
« Reply #368: April 22, 2009, 08:57:37 PM »
Flores roped what would have been a single if the infielders weren't in. it was almost a single as it was



is that :az: over there?

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93629
Re: Nationals vs Braves, Game 3
« Reply #369: April 22, 2009, 08:57:42 PM »
freak Cintron/Manny. we have a jackass for a manger.


Offline natsfan4evr

  • Posts: 6171
Re: Nationals vs Braves, Game 3
« Reply #370: April 22, 2009, 08:57:50 PM »
Cintron really sucks.. bad

Offline KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 15291
  • Nats RP have no nerve
Re: Nationals vs Braves, Game 3
« Reply #371: April 22, 2009, 08:57:59 PM »
Cintron at leadoff?  Are you freaking kidding?  FIRE ACTA

Offline eagleskins

  • BANNED FOREVER
  • Posts: 2946
Re: Nationals vs Braves, Game 3
« Reply #372: April 22, 2009, 08:58:36 PM »
This game is totally on Manny.  Plays his homeboys in critical spots. 

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37378
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals vs Braves, Game 3
« Reply #373: April 22, 2009, 08:58:36 PM »
haha cintron is just so bad.  way to go nats think tank.  we have a bunch of middle infielders that aren't worth a damn and our ownership group is so cheap they can't afford orlando hudson who is tearing it up.  :clap:

Offline Bags

  • Posts: 357
Re: Nationals vs Braves, Game 3
« Reply #374: April 22, 2009, 08:58:49 PM »
Today it will probably be Saul :bang:
Leave Mock in whether we get the lead here or not.