Author Topic: Gameday Thread: Nationals vs Braves, Game 1 (Curly W) (Read 13864 times)

PC · « **Reply #75:** April 21, 2006, 10:46:27 PM »

It's raining again.

tomterp · « **Reply #76:** April 21, 2006, 10:47:32 PM »

I love it that we're into their bullpen now. Where's Kolb?

Vladman1327 · « **Reply #77:** April 21, 2006, 10:49:33 PM »

Milwaukee

PC · « **Reply #78:** April 21, 2006, 10:51:08 PM »

You know, Royce Clayton looks a lot younger than his 36 years.

The Chief · « **Reply #79:** April 21, 2006, 10:51:58 PM »

We could really use a hit from Schneider here.

He's doing a good job fighting off these pitches.

Darn, oh well. It was a good AB at least.

The Chief · « **Reply #80:** April 21, 2006, 10:57:29 PM »

National League East watch:

Fish beat the Phils 4-3 at Citizen's Bank.

Mets and Padres are 0-0 in the bottom of the 3rd in San Diego.

The Chief · « **Reply #81:** April 21, 2006, 10:59:17 PM »

The Chief · « **Reply #82:** April 21, 2006, 11:01:15 PM »

Sits Andruw down for #8

tomterp · « **Reply #83:** April 21, 2006, 11:03:41 PM »

JP

WOW

The Chief · « **Reply #84:** April 21, 2006, 11:07:37 PM »

Why was Soriano running there?

nats2playoffs · « **Reply #85:** April 21, 2006, 11:08:29 PM »

How about letting Patterson get a complete game

: 82 pitches. The ump called a lot of strikes in last year's 2-hour-delayed April Shower game.

PC · « **Reply #86:** April 21, 2006, 11:08:35 PM »

Ugh. We'd have runners on 1st and 2nd with 1 out, if...

PC · « **Reply #87:** April 21, 2006, 11:11:26 PM »

Now, we'd have at least one more run, if...

esoteric · « **Reply #88:** April 21, 2006, 11:11:42 PM »

Dammit, now we'd another run in. And FR would be more inclined to let Patterson go for the CG.

The Chief · « **Reply #89:** April 21, 2006, 11:12:04 PM »

Quote from: "PC"

Ugh. We'd have runners on 1st and 2nd with 1 out, if...

You mean bases loaded with 1 out (or maybe 4-0 with 1 out)

tomterp · « **Reply #90:** April 21, 2006, 11:12:17 PM »

Soriano demonstrated why stealing is mostly dumb.

He was already in scoring position, and Vidro/Johnson coming up. Cost us a run and an out.

KyleScha · « **Reply #91:** April 21, 2006, 11:14:13 PM »

stealing second is good. Stealing third is not. Especially with your best hitters coming up. A single will score you from second or third, so it doesnt matter that much.

PC · « **Reply #92:** April 21, 2006, 11:15:09 PM »

Quote from: "tomterp"

Soriano demonstrated why stealing is mostly dumb.

He was already in scoring position, and Vidro/Johnson coming up. Cost us a run and an out.

Stealing is fine, if you're up by five or six in the 9th. Otherwise, this team, usually, doesn't have the offense to risk giving up outs.

PC · « **Reply #93:** April 21, 2006, 11:20:12 PM »

esoteric · « **Reply #94:** April 21, 2006, 11:22:21 PM »

Boo. 3-1 Braves. A real mix-up there at first base cost us a run.

The Chief · « **Reply #95:** April 21, 2006, 11:23:41 PM »

DAMMIT DAMMIT DAMMIT DAMMIT DAMMIT DAMMIT

PC · « **Reply #96:** April 21, 2006, 11:24:02 PM »

Now that Soriano attempted steal is even bigger.

deeznatz · « **Reply #97:** April 21, 2006, 11:24:27 PM »

PLEASE PLEASE let JP finish this one out......Chad's ego won't be hurt....he's earned a complete game!!

KyleScha · « **Reply #98:** April 21, 2006, 11:25:03 PM »

We make a mistake and look, the tying run is now on third.

The Chief · « **Reply #99:** April 21, 2006, 11:25:25 PM »

Quote from: "PC"

Now that Soriano attempted steal is even bigger.

Or that botched play at first by Nick