Author Topic: Gio to Nats  (Read 39025 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online imref

  • Posts: 43139
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Re: Gio to Nats
« Reply #550: December 26, 2011, 02:25:20 PM »
interesting note in the fangraph comments - his first pitch strike rate is 53%, versus 60% overall.

Guess what McCatty is going to focus on?

And top 10 comparables over the last 2 years:

(K9, BB9, GB/FB)
Gio Gonzalez (8.23, 4.09, 1.40)

1 Jorge de la Rosa (8.22, 3.84, 1.55)
2 Felipe Paulino (8.37, 3.97, 1.13)
3 Ubaldo Jimenez (8.65, 3.73, 1.41)
4 Ryan Dempster (8.6, 3.62, 1.27)
5 Francisco Liriano (8.62, 3.64, 1.66)
6 C.J. Wilson (7.92, 3.52, 1.51)
7 A.J. Burnett (7.60, 3.85, 1.35)
8 Tom Gorzelanny (7.91, 3.77, 0.89)
9 Jhoulys Chacin (7.66, 4.04, 1.83)
10 James McDonald (7.80, 3.90, 0.86)

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 35131
  • World Champions!!!
Re: Gio to Nats
« Reply #551: December 26, 2011, 02:51:09 PM »
What's more interesting is that overall his zone % (# of strikes) is normal like all other MLB pitchers. Basically if he starts throwing more strike ones, he'll become dominant.

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 63366
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Gio to Nats
« Reply #552: December 26, 2011, 06:38:20 PM »
sorry if this was already posted - just saw it on MLBTR - http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/how-good-is-gio-gonzalez/

ceiling is ubaldo, basement is cabrerra.

So a guy who's already established himself as having All Star ability is suddenly going to become Daniel Cabrerra? Sounds far fetched to me.

Offline defendyourself15

  • Posts: 1
Re: Gio to Nats
« Reply #553: December 26, 2011, 08:55:14 PM »
So a guy who's already established himself as having All Star ability is suddenly going to become Daniel Cabrerra? Sounds far fetched to me.
Yea I find that difficult to believe.  Not sure if he will be great but don't see him being a Daniel Cabrerra either especially moving to the NL.

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 35131
  • World Champions!!!
Re: Gio to Nats
« Reply #554: December 26, 2011, 08:57:52 PM »
Did you guys bother to read the article? Nowhere did it say it was likely that he would become Cabrerra.

Online imref

  • Posts: 43139
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Re: Gio to Nats
« Reply #555: December 26, 2011, 09:00:36 PM »
Did you guys bother to read the article? Nowhere did it say it was likely that he would become Cabrerra.

yeah, they just had cabrerra's age-26 season listed as a similar year to what Gio posted. 

Offline Tyler Durden

  • Posts: 7970
  • Leprechaun
Re: Gio to Nats
« Reply #556: December 26, 2011, 10:10:50 PM »
http://www.federalbaseball.com/2011/12/26/2662716/washington-nationals-lefty-gio-gonzalez-trusts-his-fastball

Gio is a lefty but is pretty good against right handed hitters, too.  He held them to a .636 OPS in 2011.

Offline Baseball is Life

  • Posts: 20393
  • Proud member of the Sunshine Squad.
Re: Gio to Nats
« Reply #557: December 27, 2011, 03:14:07 PM »
Good look by Zuckerman on the state of the farm after the Gio trade. The cupboard is not bare (or should I say the future looks Sunshiny?)

http://www.natsinsider.com/2011/12/revised-state-of-farm-system.html

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 35131
  • World Champions!!!
Re: Gio to Nats
« Reply #558: December 27, 2011, 03:20:48 PM »
Well, he couldn't be more wrong about the guys he profiled.

Meyer "... figures to be on a fast track and shouldn't need much time in the minors" - Not a chance. They'll be lucky if he makes an impact in three years. With his inconsistent delivery, he's going to need a lot of time to figure things out.

"Add a couple of left-handers out of the 2010 draft -- Sammy Solis and Robbie Ray" - Solis blew out his arm, and for whatever reason, every scout that's seen Ray has trashed him in their scouting reports.

I'm still high on the system.. but Zuckerman doesn't have a clue as to what he's talking about.

Offline Baseball is Life

  • Posts: 20393
  • Proud member of the Sunshine Squad.
Re: Gio to Nats
« Reply #559: December 27, 2011, 03:26:59 PM »
Well, he couldn't be more wrong about the guys he profiled.

Meyer "... figures to be on a fast track and shouldn't need much time in the minors" - Not a chance. They'll be lucky if he makes an impact in three years. With his inconsistent delivery, he's going to need a lot of time to figure things out.

"Add a couple of left-handers out of the 2010 draft -- Sammy Solis and Robbie Ray" - Solis blew out his arm, and for whatever reason, every scout that's seen Ray has trashed him in their scouting reports.

I'm still high on the system.. but Zuckerman doesn't have a clue as to what he's talking about.

So who do you like in the system and might have an impact in 2012, besides Harper who will surely be up before the ASB?:~)

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 35131
  • World Champions!!!
Re: Gio to Nats
« Reply #560: December 27, 2011, 03:29:51 PM »
So who do you like in the system and might have an impact in 2012, besides Harper who will surely be up before the ASB?:~)

No one?

At least not on the major league level. Maybe Lombardozzi if someone gets hurt... but there's no one in the high minors that's going to help the club next year.

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21643
Re: Gio to Nats
« Reply #561: December 27, 2011, 03:41:06 PM »
So who do you like in the system and might have an impact in 2012, besides Harper who will surely be up before the ASB?:~)

Lombo? Marrero would have, but he's hurt. Someone will inevitably end up starting at some point (again maybe it would have been Solis, but he's hurt), but probably no one we'd term a 'prospect'

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: Gio to Nats
« Reply #562: December 27, 2011, 03:46:12 PM »
I'd look for RH relief pitcher Rafael Martin to pitch in the Bigs at some point in '12.

But yeah the upper Minors are pretty bare compared to the past few years. Tyler Moore is blocked by multiple guys and he still needs to improve his plate discipline.

Offline Tyler Durden

  • Posts: 7970
  • Leprechaun
Re: Gio to Nats
« Reply #563: December 27, 2011, 04:23:30 PM »
I agree the upper minors are pretty bare right now.

If health holds up, we won't need too many reinforcements.  Maybe a AAAA innings eater type once Stras reaches his innings limit.  Or Stammen/Detwiler/Gorzelanny takes those innigns and Martin goes to the bullpen.

Offline Vega

  • Posts: 5516
  • Party’s Over
Re: Gio to Nats
« Reply #564: December 27, 2011, 04:26:00 PM »
Reinforcements? Easy solution. BRING BACK LIVO

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21643
Re: Gio to Nats
« Reply #565: December 27, 2011, 04:27:59 PM »
I agree the upper minors are pretty bare right now.

If health holds up, we won't need too many reinforcements.  Maybe a AAAA innings eater type once Stras reaches his innings limit.  Or Stammen/Detwiler/Gorzelanny takes those innigns and Martin goes to the bullpen.

martin is a marlin now


Offline HTT

  • Posts: 212
Re: Gio to Nats
« Reply #566: December 27, 2011, 04:34:45 PM »
They are talking about Rafael, not JD.

Online JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 40003
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: Gio to Nats
« Reply #567: December 27, 2011, 04:55:39 PM »
SF - wilkie's not a hard thrower but hasn't he been effective?  could he be a middle reliever when Gorzo or someone moves to the rotation late in the year?

Offline Baseball is Life

  • Posts: 20393
  • Proud member of the Sunshine Squad.
Re: Gio to Nats
« Reply #568: December 27, 2011, 05:25:25 PM »
I think Rendon comes up in September if he stays healthy. They'll find some PT for him somewhere, unless of course they are on a playoff drive.:`)

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 35131
  • World Champions!!!
Re: Gio to Nats
« Reply #569: December 27, 2011, 05:36:10 PM »
Rendon hasn't even proven the ability to make a throw from third to first. Lets not put the cart before the horse with him.

Offline Ray D

  • Posts: 10073
Re: Gio to Nats
« Reply #570: December 27, 2011, 05:42:44 PM »
Rendon hasn't even proven the ability to make a throw from third to first.
Neither has Zimmerman.

(Sorry, I couldn't resist that.)


Offline GburgNatsFan

  • Posts: 22292
  • Let's drink a few for Mathguy.
Re: Gio to Nats
« Reply #571: December 27, 2011, 05:43:19 PM »
I'm a 'shiner, and even I think BiL is getting ahead of himself. :)

Rendon hasn't even proven the ability to make a throw from third to first. Lets not put the cart before the horse with him.


Online JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 40003
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: Gio to Nats
« Reply #572: December 27, 2011, 09:30:04 PM »
Sickels had an interesting take on the deal.  http://www.minorleagueball.com/2011/12/22/2656256/prospects-gio-gonzalez-trade-oakland-athletics-washington-nationals-cole-peacock-milone-norris

He's pretty high on Peacock in the short term and says the Nats gave up 2 potential "front-lineaces."  His view is the As got fair value for Gio.  his concluding paragraph:
Quote
It's a win-now, cash-in-chips transaction for the Nationals. From their point of view, Gonzalez is more likely to help them in '12 than Peacock or Milone. If this trade works out for Oakland, they've obtained two pitchers who could be front-line ace starters with Cole and Peacock, a major-league-ready, strike-throwing inning-chewer who consistently defies skeptics in Milone, and a future starting catcher in Norris. As with all trades involving prospects, it is unlikely they will all reach their full potential, but I think the Athletics got fair value.


Hardball Times has some interesting coverage, too.
Quote
The widely varying opinions are probably a sign that the Nationals and Athletics made a good trade.

Gonzalez is a big addition for the Nationals, even if he isn’t the ace they wanted. Injuries are always a risk with pitchers, but Gonzalez has been durable throughout his career. The Nationals will count on over 200 innings from their new pitcher.

The reason Gonzalez isn’t seen as an ace by many is because he walks too many batters due to suspect control. As general manager Mike Rizzo pointed out, his walk rate has improved every year – albeit at a slow pace. Gonzalez could also see some statistical improvement from switching to the senior circuit.

The Athletics have to be pretty excited about the prospect package they received. 
He goes through the pluses and minuses of each of our traded guys, and concludes everyone in the deal has potential but warts.

Offline RobDibblesGhost

  • Posts: 31455
Re: Gio to Nats
« Reply #573: December 27, 2011, 10:11:17 PM »
He goes through the pluses and minuses of each of our traded guys, and concludes everyone in the deal has potential but warts.

Sounds painful :shock:

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21643
Re: Gio to Nats
« Reply #574: December 27, 2011, 10:20:27 PM »