Author Topic: Gio to Nats  (Read 38789 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline TylerDC

  • Posts: 5962
  • The Future.
Gio to Nats
« Topic Start: December 22, 2011, 04:08:54 PM »
Apparently it's official.

Offline Minty Fresh

  • Posts: 20386
  • BOOM!
Re: Gio to Nats(?)
« Reply #1: December 22, 2011, 04:09:17 PM »

Offline cletusvandamme

  • Posts: 162
Re: Gio to Nats(?)
« Reply #2: December 22, 2011, 04:09:43 PM »
With all due respect to Jesus Christ, Jesus Christ.

Offline JMUalumni

  • Posts: 7787
Re: Gio to Nats(?)
« Reply #3: December 22, 2011, 04:09:57 PM »
According to KLaw:  Cole, Milone, Peacock, Norris for Gio

Online imref

  • Posts: 42995
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Re: Gio to Nats(?)
« Reply #4: December 22, 2011, 04:10:00 PM »
keith law - A.J. Cole, Brad Peacock, Derek Norris and Tommy Milone for Gio.

Crap.

Offline cletusvandamme

  • Posts: 162
Re: Gio to Nats(?)
« Reply #5: December 22, 2011, 04:10:05 PM »
Cole, Norris, Peacock, Milone

Offline loshjott

  • Posts: 232
Re: Gio to Nats(?)
« Reply #6: December 22, 2011, 04:10:27 PM »
Keith Law on Twitter

Gio to Nats for Cole, Norris, Peacock, and Milone. Love this for Oakland

https://twitter.com/#!/keithlaw/status/149958652554522624

Online imref

  • Posts: 42995
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Re: Gio to Nats(?)
« Reply #7: December 22, 2011, 04:10:35 PM »
i hope he's wrong, that's way way too much to give up for Gonzales.

Offline Minty Fresh

  • Posts: 20386
  • BOOM!
Re: Gio to Nats(?)
« Reply #8: December 22, 2011, 04:10:38 PM »
CRAP ON A CRACKER.

Offline TylerDC

  • Posts: 5962
  • The Future.
Re: Gio to Nats(?)
« Reply #9: December 22, 2011, 04:11:01 PM »
This is freaking dumb. We could have just signed Buhrle

Offline Kevrock

  • Posts: 13788
  • That’s gonna be a no from me, doge.
Re: Gio to Nats(?)
« Reply #10: December 22, 2011, 04:11:19 PM »
Too much.

oh well nice rotation we have

Offline Minty Fresh

  • Posts: 20386
  • BOOM!
Re: Gio to Nats(?)
« Reply #11: December 22, 2011, 04:11:20 PM »
i hope he's wrong, that's way way too much to give up for Gonzales.

How about for Gonzalez?  ;)

Offline Tyler Durden

  • Posts: 7970
  • Leprechaun
Re: Gio to Nats(?)
« Reply #12: December 22, 2011, 04:11:23 PM »
Gonzalez is still better than Burleigh.  Under team control (cheap) and a lot younger.  They're not the same pitcher - the Red Sox, for example, look like they want Gonzalez but not Burlay.

Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23269
Re: Gio to Nats(?)
« Reply #13: December 22, 2011, 04:12:00 PM »
Strasburg, Gio, and Zimmermann for years to come. I'm pretty happy about this.

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Gio to Nats(?)
« Reply #14: December 22, 2011, 04:12:02 PM »
Too much...

...and this should be broken off into its own thread.

Offline cletusvandamme

  • Posts: 162
Re: Gio to Nats(?)
« Reply #15: December 22, 2011, 04:12:04 PM »
Have to get Fielder now.  Makes zero sense otherwise. 

Offline Minty Fresh

  • Posts: 20386
  • BOOM!
Re: Gio to Nats(?)
« Reply #16: December 22, 2011, 04:12:06 PM »
Too much.

oh well nice rotation we have

+1

Love the rotation, not the trade.

Offline panthers30

  • Posts: 925
Re: Gio to Nats(?)
« Reply #17: December 22, 2011, 04:12:28 PM »
Noooooooo.  Not AJ Cole :(

UGHHHHHH.  Gio is good, yeah... but come on, seriously just wow.

Online imref

  • Posts: 42995
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Re: Gio to Nats(?)
« Reply #18: December 22, 2011, 04:12:42 PM »

Offline Minty Fresh

  • Posts: 20386
  • BOOM!
Re: Gio to Nats(?)
« Reply #19: December 22, 2011, 04:12:57 PM »
Gonzalez is still better than Burleigh.  Under team control (cheap) and a lot younger.  They're not the same pitcher - the Red Sox, for example, look like they want Gonzalez but not Burlay.

This made me laugh.

Offline Tyler Durden

  • Posts: 7970
  • Leprechaun
Re: Gio to Nats(?)
« Reply #20: December 22, 2011, 04:13:02 PM »
Crazy that this morning everyone was talking about the Boz article.  Mission accomplished for Boz?

Online imref

  • Posts: 42995
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Re: Gio to Nats(?)
« Reply #21: December 22, 2011, 04:13:04 PM »
so what if we add Fielder next.......

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 35131
  • World Champions!!!
Re: Gio to Nats(?)
« Reply #22: December 22, 2011, 04:13:09 PM »
Well, Milone should be a stud for Oakland with that big park they've got.

Offline blue911

  • Posts: 18487
Re: Gio to Nats(?)
« Reply #23: December 22, 2011, 04:13:32 PM »
Have to get Fielder now.  Makes zero sense otherwise. 

This is my thought. Back to the foil hat

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Gio to Nats(?)
« Reply #24: December 22, 2011, 04:13:45 PM »
so what if we add Fielder next.......

NL East champions.