Author Topic: 2010 MLB Playoffs Gameday Discussions  (Read 48220 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline welch

  • Posts: 16432
  • The Sweetest Right Handed Swing in 1950s Baseball
Re: 2010 MLB Playoffs Gameday Discussions
« Reply #1075: October 23, 2010, 11:46:29 PM »
Come on, now: THE GIANTS WIN THE PENNANT! THE GIANTS WIN THE PENNANT!

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: 2010 MLB Playoffs Gameday Discussions
« Reply #1076: October 23, 2010, 11:46:53 PM »

Edit: I absolutely love seeing another team celebrating in the Phillies stadium.

Like when the Nats beat Philly at Nationals Park.  :?

Offline eckseid

  • Posts: 855
Re: 2010 MLB Playoffs Gameday Discussions
« Reply #1077: October 23, 2010, 11:47:44 PM »
Like when the Nats beat Philly at Nationals Park.  :?

I don't know if I should laugh at that or cry..

Offline Coladar

  • Posts: 2826
Re: 2010 MLB Playoffs Gameday Discussions
« Reply #1078: October 23, 2010, 11:48:24 PM »
Nothing makes this better than Wilson making it so close. Makes it hurt for those classless bunch of trash in Philly even worse. Classy to boo the way they did.

Lincecum and Lee = *drool* should be a good WS with two teams that deserve to be there, didn't buy their way there, and haven't won it all either at all, or in so long for the Giants, that you can root for both teams just as easily. And those useless Philly fans are crying in their beers. That never hurts either.

Offline cmdterps44

  • Posts: 15551
  • Future
Re: 2010 MLB Playoffs Gameday Discussions
« Reply #1079: October 23, 2010, 11:54:03 PM »
Oh yeah, Hammonds likes "penisface" Cody Ross now.

Offline CALSGR8

  • Posts: 11609
  • BE LOUD. BE PROUD. BE POSITIVE!
Re: 2010 MLB Playoffs Gameday Discussions
« Reply #1080: October 23, 2010, 11:54:21 PM »
Come on, now: THE GIANTS WIN THE PENNANT! THE GIANTS WIN THE PENNANT!

My thoughts exactly!   This time I don't cringe when I hear it.

Online imref

  • Posts: 42979
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Re: 2010 MLB Playoffs Gameday Discussions
« Reply #1081: October 23, 2010, 11:57:28 PM »
i have mixed feelings about this one.  Yes, as a Nats fan I'm happy the Phillies lost, especially at home.  But as a Nats fan, I also look at the Giants line-up and bullpen and wonder how the heck they are going to the WS and we lost 93 games.  Maybe we can contend next year if we get some combination of Lee, Greinke, and Garza.

Offline DPMOmaha

  • Posts: 22875
Re: 2010 MLB Playoffs Gameday Discussions
« Reply #1082: October 23, 2010, 11:58:29 PM »
So, Feliz K's Arod looking and Wilson K's Howard looking.  Apropos.

Offline EdStroud

  • Posts: 10139
Re: 2010 MLB Playoffs Gameday Discussions
« Reply #1083: October 24, 2010, 12:00:56 AM »
So, Feliz K's Arod looking and Wilson K's Howard looking.  Apropos.
I didn't know they were greek

Offline cmdterps44

  • Posts: 15551
  • Future
Re: 2010 MLB Playoffs Gameday Discussions
« Reply #1084: October 24, 2010, 12:01:03 AM »
i have mixed feelings about this one.  Yes, as a Nats fan I'm happy the Phillies lost, especially at home.  But as a Nats fan, I also look at the Giants line-up and bullpen and wonder how the heck they are going to the WS and we lost 93 games.  Maybe we can contend next year if we get some combination of Lee, Greinke, and Garza.

They have a good lineup. Alot of them are good hitters. It seems our guys are hit our miss. Huff, Posey, Panda are solid. Uribe and Ross are decent. Burrell is hit or miss. Torres seems like a trooper.

Offline Coladar

  • Posts: 2826
Re: 2010 MLB Playoffs Gameday Discussions
« Reply #1085: October 24, 2010, 12:02:20 AM »
i have mixed feelings about this one.  Yes, as a Nats fan I'm happy the Phillies lost, especially at home.  But as a Nats fan, I also look at the Giants line-up and bullpen and wonder how the heck they are going to the WS and we lost 93 games.  Maybe we can contend next year if we get some combination of Lee, Greinke, and Garza.

It's called not having Nyjer Morgan and some random #2 hitter leading off and not having Livan Hernandez as your only consistent starter through the season. And also not having a bench of Wil Nieves, Willie Harris the entire season and Kevin Mench for the last two months of the season. Those are some freaking huge differences.

Offline cmdterps44

  • Posts: 15551
  • Future
Re: 2010 MLB Playoffs Gameday Discussions
« Reply #1086: October 24, 2010, 12:04:47 AM »
What did Brian Wilson say?

Offline cmdterps44

  • Posts: 15551
  • Future

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: 2010 MLB Playoffs Gameday Discussions
« Reply #1088: October 24, 2010, 12:19:24 AM »
He shouldn't get one from the Giants now that he's actually facing them in the WS. How can you accept one from the Giants with a good conscience if you are currently trying to beat them?

Online imref

  • Posts: 42979
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Re: 2010 MLB Playoffs Gameday Discussions
« Reply #1089: October 24, 2010, 12:23:57 AM »
What did Brian Wilson say?

he said "thank the Lord I closed it out in the ninth and didn't make my manager spend the rest of his life wondering why he let me hit with the bases loaded in the 8th".

:)

Offline Ali the Baseball Cat

  • Posts: 17666
  • babble on
Re: 2010 MLB Playoffs Gameday Discussions
« Reply #1090: October 24, 2010, 12:58:00 AM »
Haw haw, too true

he said "thank the Lord I closed it out in the ninth and didn't make my manager spend the rest of his life wondering why he let me hit with the bases loaded in the 8th".

:)

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 35131
  • World Champions!!!
Re: 2010 MLB Playoffs Gameday Discussions
« Reply #1091: October 24, 2010, 01:08:22 AM »
i have mixed feelings about this one.  Yes, as a Nats fan I'm happy the Phillies lost, especially at home.  But as a Nats fan, I also look at the Giants line-up and bullpen and wonder how the heck they are going to the WS and we lost 93 games.  Maybe we can contend next year if we get some combination of Lee, Greinke, and Garza.

I don't know.

Sanchez is a former batting champ, Posey is a star, Uribe has a solid bat, Burrell can hit 30 plus HR's.

I like their lineup a lot better than anything the Nats put out.

Offline Sharp

  • Posts: 3582
Re: 2010 MLB Playoffs Gameday Discussions
« Reply #1092: October 24, 2010, 01:29:19 AM »
I don't know.

Sanchez is a former batting champ, Posey is a star, Uribe has a solid bat, Burrell can hit 30 plus HR's.

I like their lineup a lot better than anything the Nats put out.
Nah.  The Giants' lineup is okay--better than the Nats'--but it's nothing special.  If it weren't for their excellent pitching the Giants wouldn't even be sniffing the World Series.  Even as it was they barely won out over the Padres.

Offline Potomac Cannons

  • Posts: 3279
Re: 2010 MLB Playoffs Gameday Discussions
« Reply #1093: October 24, 2010, 02:05:01 AM »
Nah.  The Giants' lineup is okay--better than the Nats'--but it's nothing special.  If it weren't for their excellent pitching the Giants wouldn't even be sniffing the World Series.  Even as it was they barely won out over the Padres.

They're a team built for the playoffs.  Now that pitching matters again they actually got there.

Offline Coladar

  • Posts: 2826
Re: 2010 MLB Playoffs Gameday Discussions
« Reply #1094: October 24, 2010, 02:22:04 AM »
I was pondering on this, wonder if anyone has an answer off the top of their head. This clearly has to be the World Series matchup with the longest combined years without a win between the two teams, right? 48 for the Rangers (ie never) and 54 for the Giants. So 102 combined years without a WS victory. Until the Cubs appear again, this is a record, right?

Second, is it the most combined years since a WS appearance? Another 48 for the Rangers due to never appearing, and 8 for the Giants, for 56 years between the two teams without a WS appearance. If those aren't records, which I doubt for the appearance and suspect could be for the wins, how do they rate? I'm hoping someone heard/read at least one of the answers somewhere, as it would take a fair while to look it up year by year.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37394
Re: 2010 MLB Playoffs Gameday Discussions
« Reply #1095: October 24, 2010, 02:23:14 AM »
haha ryan jerk, chase baby, j.c. steroido, tubby blanton, shane doucharino how do you enjoy the offseason.

suck it fills.

Offline EdStroud

  • Posts: 10139
Re: 2010 MLB Playoffs Gameday Discussions
« Reply #1096: October 24, 2010, 02:48:19 AM »
I was pondering on this, wonder if anyone has an answer off the top of their head. This clearly has to be the World Series matchup with the longest combined years without a win between the two teams, right? 48 for the Rangers (ie never) and 54 for the Giants. So 102 combined years without a WS victory. Until the Cubs appear again, this is a record, right?

Second, is it the most combined years since a WS appearance? Another 48 for the Rangers due to never appearing, and 8 for the Giants, for 56 years between the two teams without a WS appearance. If those aren't records, which I doubt for the appearance and suspect could be for the wins, how do they rate? I'm hoping someone heard/read at least one of the answers somewhere, as it would take a fair while to look it up year by year.
Red Sox vs Cardinals 2004 WS would be 106 years combined without a victory

Offline Nathan

  • Posts: 10726
  • Wow. Such warnings. Very baseball. Moderator Doge.
Re: 2010 MLB Playoffs Gameday Discussions
« Reply #1097: October 24, 2010, 02:58:47 AM »
haha ryan jerk, chase baby, j.c. steroido, tubby blanton, shane doucharino how do you enjoy the offseason.

suck it fills.
:lmao: "doucharino"

Offline Coladar

  • Posts: 2826
Re: 2010 MLB Playoffs Gameday Discussions
« Reply #1098: October 24, 2010, 03:39:58 AM »
Red Sox vs Cardinals 2004 WS would be 106 years combined without a victory

How soon I forget the Red Sox and the White Sox both ended obscenely long WS droughts, "curses" that have been forgotten amazingly quickly the past five years. Still, it comes quite close. So all that's left is the appearance combined total. I'm doubtful that approaches a record of any sorts, but it's possible.

Thanks for the answer.

Offline Coladar

  • Posts: 2826
Re: 2010 MLB Playoffs Gameday Discussions
« Reply #1099: October 24, 2010, 03:42:35 AM »
By the way, mentioning the White Sox made me remember who they played in the WS that year. It blows the 04 WS out of the water. 88 years for the White Sox, never for the Astros, so from 65-05, another 40 years. 128 years combined without a WS title in the 2005 World Series matchup, just in case I'm not the only nut on here obsessed with bizarre stats and records like this.

Edit to add: after posting this, it then further dawned on me that I recalled in 2005 it was a huge deal the Astros had never made it to the WS. So turns out I can answer the second part of my question myself. Astros didn't appear in the WS until 05, so 65-05 = 40 years. White Sox last won the AL pennant in 59, so another 46 years. The World Series of 2005 had a matchup of two teams that had a combined 86 years without appearing in the WS.

This decade has been really pretty damn good to a bunch of teams that haven't had success. Much as everyone clamors about the Phillies/Yankees/Cardinals/Red Sox owning the decade, we've had the Diamondbacks, Red Sox, White Sox, Angels all winning either their first WS or first in nearly a century. Astros, Rockies, Rays, Rangers, Diamondbacks all making their first WS appearance ever. Thats pretty damn good for a single decade.