Author Topic: WNFF 2.0 thread  (Read 29277 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline DPMOmaha

  • Posts: 22875
Re: WNFF 2.0 thread
« Reply #100: September 12, 2011, 01:14:33 PM »
The Post/Preview buttons right justified is not good.
Okay, Chief thank you. I have switched to the WNFF 2.0 theme. The post/preview button should be centered under the text box, not to the right.
:lmao:

Offline imref

  • Posts: 42404
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Re: WNFF 2.0 thread
« Reply #101: September 12, 2011, 01:46:34 PM »
is there any way to modify the mobile site settings so that it displays more than 3 posts per page?

Offline houston-nat

  • Posts: 19050
Re: WNFF 2.0 thread
« Reply #102: September 12, 2011, 01:48:13 PM »
It should show up now.  I forget to set that setting for the "WNFF 2.0" theme, but it was already set on the classic and default themes.

Sweet! And by the way I love the right-aligned Post buttons, although that's because I'm CANC. :koolaid:

Offline imref

  • Posts: 42404
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Re: WNFF 2.0 thread
« Reply #103: September 12, 2011, 01:48:21 PM »
really liking the WNFF 2.0 theme - thanks Chief.  i do notice that every third post about John Lannan seems to crash the system.  :)

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 31799
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: WNFF 2.0 thread
« Reply #104: September 12, 2011, 01:52:13 PM »
really liking the WNFF 2.0 theme - thanks Chief.  i do notice that every third post about John Lannan seems to crash the system.  :)

Huh?

Offline imref

  • Posts: 42404
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Re: WNFF 2.0 thread
« Reply #105: September 12, 2011, 01:57:18 PM »
Huh?

it was a joke - based on Lannan's 3rd inning the other night.

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 31799
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: WNFF 2.0 thread
« Reply #106: September 12, 2011, 02:01:59 PM »
it was a joke - based on Lannan's 3rd inning the other night.

Ah :)

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 31799
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: WNFF 2.0 thread
« Reply #107: September 12, 2011, 02:13:49 PM »
is there any way to modify the mobile site settings so that it displays more than 3 posts per page?

It's 5 per page, but no, not that I know of.  I could dig into the code and look, but I'm guessing they kept it low in order to ensure compatibility with low-memory devices (dumbphones) and to keep page load times quick.

Offline imref

  • Posts: 42404
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Re: WNFF 2.0 thread
« Reply #108: September 12, 2011, 02:56:27 PM »
It's 5 per page, but no, not that I know of.  I could dig into the code and look, but I'm guessing they kept it low in order to ensure compatibility with low-memory devices (dumbphones) and to keep page load times quick.

thanks.


Offline GburgNatsFan

  • Posts: 22277
  • Let's drink a few for Mathguy.
Re: WNFF 2.0 thread
« Reply #109: September 12, 2011, 04:16:34 PM »
Thanks. I'm embarrassed I missed the little link right at the top of that page the last time I looked.

go into your profile via the link near the top of the screen, look and layout should still be there.

Offline blue911

  • Posts: 18471
Re: WNFF 2.0 thread
« Reply #110: September 12, 2011, 07:50:54 PM »
I like it

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 31799
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: WNFF 2.0 thread
« Reply #111: September 13, 2011, 02:28:41 PM »
For those currently using the 2.0 theme - yeah I know the banner doesn't fit quite right or completely match the new color scheme, I'm working on it.  Would all 7 of you rather I take it down in the meantime or leave it up?

Offline Minty Fresh

  • Posts: 20386
  • BOOM!
Re: WNFF 2.0 thread
« Reply #112: September 13, 2011, 03:16:29 PM »
Maybe I'm not using 2.0 since I don't see what you're talking about?   :shrug:

Also, why is my "quote" feature not working?  :rant:

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 31799
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: WNFF 2.0 thread
« Reply #113: September 13, 2011, 03:26:42 PM »
Maybe I'm not using 2.0 since I don't see what you're talking about?   :shrug:

Also, why is my "quote" feature not working?  :rant:

You aren't.

Click this link - http://www.wnff.net/index.php?action=theme;sa=pick

And choose "WNFF 2.0" at the bottom.

RE: quotes - sometimes if you back into a page, quote doesn't work.  Try reloading the page or just clicking out to the main board and then back into the thread.

Offline houston-nat

  • Posts: 19050
Re: WNFF 2.0 thread
« Reply #114: September 13, 2011, 04:14:29 PM »
For those currently using the 2.0 theme - yeah I know the banner doesn't fit quite right or completely match the new color scheme, I'm working on it.  Would all 7 of you rather I take it down in the meantime or leave it up?

Well I like it. I minimized the rest of the welcome header and am cruisin' the board that way.

Offline blue911

  • Posts: 18471
Re: WNFF 2.0 thread
« Reply #115: September 13, 2011, 04:19:56 PM »
I don't pay any attention to it.

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 31799
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: WNFF 2.0 thread
« Reply #116: September 13, 2011, 09:28:49 PM »
Figured out a better solution for the banner.  Still want to make some adjustments but this is much more tolerable for now.

Offline houston-nat

  • Posts: 19050
Re: WNFF 2.0 thread
« Reply #117: September 13, 2011, 10:14:25 PM »
Figured out a better solution for the banner.  Still want to make some adjustments but this is much more tolerable for now.

Looks like sex to me.

Offline DPMOmaha

  • Posts: 22875
Re: WNFF 2.0 thread
« Reply #118: September 13, 2011, 10:23:41 PM »
Looks like sex to me.
So, let me follow this equation...

WNFF theme 2.0=pictures

Is that about it?

Offline houston-nat

  • Posts: 19050
Re: WNFF 2.0 thread
« Reply #119: September 13, 2011, 10:34:54 PM »
So, let me follow this equation...

WNFF theme 2.0=pictures

Is that about it?

sex ≠ pictures.

Offline DPMOmaha

  • Posts: 22875
Re: WNFF 2.0 thread
« Reply #120: September 13, 2011, 10:38:20 PM »
sex ≠ pictures.
True, but if it looks like sex, that implies you're watching it...

Offline MarquisDeSade

  • Posts: 15101
  • Captain Sadness
Re: WNFF 2.0 thread
« Reply #121: September 13, 2011, 11:08:07 PM »
Whoa, this looks AWESOME!

Offline houston-nat

  • Posts: 19050
Re: WNFF 2.0 thread
« Reply #122: September 13, 2011, 11:52:18 PM »
True, but if it looks like sex, that implies you're watching it...

Okay let's not get all deconstructionist English major on my post. :lol: ;)

Offline DPMOmaha

  • Posts: 22875
Re: WNFF 2.0 thread
« Reply #123: September 14, 2011, 12:47:07 AM »
:D

Offline MarquisDeSade

  • Posts: 15101
  • Captain Sadness
Re: WNFF 2.0 thread
« Reply #124: September 14, 2011, 06:48:04 AM »
Now it doesn't look awesome again.  Boo.