Author Topic: Nationals @ Braves, Game 3  (Read 26198 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 3
« Reply #25: September 06, 2008, 08:35:41 PM »
Dukes is a stud. 3/3

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 3
« Reply #26: September 06, 2008, 08:40:25 PM »
awful. We should have scored a bunch more off of Hampton. It will likely prove costly because Redding will give it up.

Offline PatsNats28

  • Posts: 8522
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 3
« Reply #27: September 06, 2008, 08:43:35 PM »
back, not many on today...

Offline shoeshineboy

  • Posts: 7934
  • Walks Kill!! Walks Kill! Walks Kill!!!!
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 3
« Reply #28: September 06, 2008, 08:48:51 PM »
Need runs. Nice to see Hinckley warming up. We need to get a lot of looks at him before the end of this season.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 3
« Reply #29: September 06, 2008, 08:50:30 PM »
Need runs. Nice to see Hinckley warming up. We need to get a lot of looks at him before the end of this season.
Yeah, because if we don't keep him on the 40-man he is a FA right? Same with Speigner and a few of the others too I think.

We've only seen Hinckley once but I think I'd prefer him over Manninng.



Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 3
« Reply #30: September 06, 2008, 08:51:12 PM »
Chipper is a lazy, selfish reject.

Great hustle by Bonifacio!

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 3
« Reply #31: September 06, 2008, 08:52:20 PM »
Perfectly placed, Anderson Hernandez!  :clap:

Offline PatsNats28

  • Posts: 8522
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 3
« Reply #32: September 06, 2008, 08:52:52 PM »
Interesting that Redding gets a "quality start".

IMO, quality starts should be min 6 innings, min 2 runs... especially in the NL.

EDIT: Sorry, I forgot 1 run was unearned.

Offline BerkeleyNat

  • Posts: 5026
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 3
« Reply #33: September 06, 2008, 08:52:52 PM »
Hell of a great job manufacturing a run there.

Offline PatsNats28

  • Posts: 8522
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 3
« Reply #34: September 06, 2008, 08:53:33 PM »
Perfectly placed, Anderson Hernandez!  :clap:

Man, is he for real? He's been hitting well, but I'm not sure if we should commit to him. What do you guys think?

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 3
« Reply #35: September 06, 2008, 08:54:49 PM »
Redding is what he is. A 4.50 ERA pitcher. #4-5 at best. Nothing to be ashamed in like I have said before.

Last 3 starts:
6 IP 2 ER
6 IP 3 ER
5.2 IP 3 ER

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 3
« Reply #36: September 06, 2008, 08:55:41 PM »
Man, is he for real? He's been hitting well, but I'm not sure if we should commit to him. What do you guys think?
Solid bench player that is fairly young (25). Can't believe they actually gave us a decent player for crappy Ayala.

Offline PatsNats28

  • Posts: 8522
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 3
« Reply #37: September 06, 2008, 08:56:13 PM »
Solid bench player that is fairly young (25). Can't believe they actually gave us a decent player for crappy Ayala.

lol well Omar Minaya is an idiot... look what he did to our farm system when we were the Expos.

Offline shoeshineboy

  • Posts: 7934
  • Walks Kill!! Walks Kill! Walks Kill!!!!
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 3
« Reply #38: September 06, 2008, 08:56:18 PM »
Yeah, because if we don't keep him on the 40-man he is a FA right? Same with Speigner and a few of the others too I think.

We've only seen Hinckley once but I think I'd prefer him over Manninng.


Yeah, that's why we need to see if he is really back to something worth keeping around. We need lefty relievers. Manning is ok to come in to face that one batter, but he has struggled more than he should have, and is useless against righties.

Offline shoeshineboy

  • Posts: 7934
  • Walks Kill!! Walks Kill! Walks Kill!!!!
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 3
« Reply #39: September 06, 2008, 09:01:21 PM »
That's not a balk.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 3
« Reply #40: September 06, 2008, 09:01:43 PM »
BS balk call. Nice play Guz.

Offline shoeshineboy

  • Posts: 7934
  • Walks Kill!! Walks Kill! Walks Kill!!!!
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 3
« Reply #41: September 06, 2008, 09:02:19 PM »
Good thing it wasn't Manning facing all those righties.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 3
« Reply #42: September 06, 2008, 09:02:34 PM »
Nice job Mike.  :thumbs:

Offline PatsNats28

  • Posts: 8522
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 3
« Reply #43: September 06, 2008, 09:02:37 PM »
Dammit, SD is down 1-0 in the bottom of the 8th. We can't afford a WAS W + SD L.

Offline d_mc_nabb

  • Posts: 778
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 3
« Reply #44: September 06, 2008, 09:03:16 PM »
UUUGGH, why do we keep winning? Please! Can't even lose right!

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 3
« Reply #45: September 06, 2008, 09:06:09 PM »
Damn, take that crap out of your mouth you toolbag. Looks like he has a freaking tumor.

Offline PatsNats28

  • Posts: 8522
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 3
« Reply #46: September 06, 2008, 09:07:05 PM »
Damn, take that crap out of your mouth you toolbag. Looks like he has a freaking tumor.

Who? (I'm assuming that its tobacco)

Offline cmdterps44

  • Posts: 15551
  • Future
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 3
« Reply #47: September 06, 2008, 09:07:21 PM »
lol, good to see we get homers tonight but come onnnn, so close to the taste of the number 1 pick. WIN PADRES WIN

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 3
« Reply #48: September 06, 2008, 09:07:58 PM »
Who? (I'm assuming that its tobacco)
Yeah, it's tobacco. The Braves' pitcher Jeff Bennett. Looks like a moron.

Offline PatsNats28

  • Posts: 8522
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 3
« Reply #49: September 06, 2008, 09:08:52 PM »
Yeah, it's tobacco. The Braves' pitcher Jeff Bennett. Looks like a moron.

Not many pitchers chew... more batters than pitchers.