Pages: 1 ... 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 [24]   Go Down

Author Topic: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2013)  (Read 34336 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline CALSGR8

  • Posts: 11609
  • BE LOUD. BE PROUD. BE POSITIVE!
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2013)
« Reply #575: December 21, 2013, 10:41:52 AM »
Logged

Offline Kevrock

  • Posts: 13788
  • That’s gonna be a no from me, doge.
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2013)
« Reply #576: December 26, 2013, 08:02:22 AM »
Logged

Offline Kurt Studzuki

  • Posts: 95
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2013)
« Reply #577: December 30, 2013, 08:17:00 PM »
Can't believe it hasn't been posted, but Kurt Suzuki to the A's.

Wonder what apartments in the Twin Cities go for.
Logged

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 35131
  • World Champions!!!
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2013)
« Reply #578: December 30, 2013, 08:34:32 PM »
Quote from: Kurt Studzuki on December 30, 2013, 08:17:00 PM
Can't believe it hasn't been posted, but Kurt Suzuki to the A's.

Wonder what apartments in the Twin Cities go for.

Pretty sure he signed with the Twins.
Logged

Offline Nathan

  • Posts: 10726
  • Wow. Such warnings. Very baseball. Moderator Doge.
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2013)
« Reply #579: December 30, 2013, 08:42:49 PM »
Quote from: Lintyfresh85 on December 20, 2013, 01:42:59 PM
Kurt Suzuki to the Twins on a one year deal.
Logged

Offline JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 39956
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2013)
« Reply #580: December 31, 2013, 08:03:43 AM »
Quote from: Kurt Studzuki on December 30, 2013, 08:17:00 PM
Can't believe it hasn't been posted, but Kurt Suzuki to the A's.

Wonder what apartments in the Twin Cities go for.
It depends on how close to the bike paths you want to be.
Logged

Offline GburgNatsFan

  • Posts: 22292
  • Let's drink a few for Mathguy.
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2013)
« Reply #581: December 31, 2013, 11:28:36 AM »
It's paradise, though.

Quote from: JCA-CrystalCity on December 31, 2013, 08:03:43 AM
It depends on how close to the bike paths you want to be.
Logged

Offline blue911

  • Posts: 18488
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2013)
« Reply #582: December 31, 2013, 11:33:59 AM »
Logged

Offline Kurt Studzuki

  • Posts: 95
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2013)
« Reply #583: December 31, 2013, 05:48:41 PM »
Sorry, meant the Twins!


Continued in 2014 thread here:
http://www.wnff.net/index.php?topic=30497.0
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 [24]   Go Up