Author Topic: 2012 World Series Discussion Thread  (Read 5154 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline zimm_da_kid

  • Posts: 7931
  • The one true ace
Re: 2012 World Series Discussion Thread
« Reply #25: October 24, 2012, 09:58:01 PM »
...and it's only the 5th inning

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 35130
  • World Champions!!!
Re: 2012 World Series Discussion Thread
« Reply #26: October 24, 2012, 09:58:46 PM »

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: 2012 World Series Discussion Thread
« Reply #27: October 24, 2012, 10:01:10 PM »
uh.. wow

Offline Squab

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 4528
  • me lookin at the bullpen

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: 2012 World Series Discussion Thread
« Reply #29: October 24, 2012, 10:30:36 PM »
Who's Sandoval's chemist???

Online Ali the Baseball Cat

  • Posts: 17657
  • babble on
Re: 2012 World Series Discussion Thread
« Reply #30: October 24, 2012, 10:41:11 PM »
That stadium is just amazing.

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 31799
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: 2012 World Series Discussion Thread
« Reply #31: October 24, 2012, 10:55:00 PM »
Giants putting on a clinic.

Online Ali the Baseball Cat

  • Posts: 17657
  • babble on
Re: 2012 World Series Discussion Thread
« Reply #32: October 24, 2012, 11:35:22 PM »
 :clap: Giants

Online imref

  • Posts: 42522
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Re: 2012 World Series Discussion Thread
« Reply #33: October 24, 2012, 11:54:15 PM »
I'm so glad I don't bet on baseball.   I figured this game (and this series) was a lock for Detroit.

Offline soxfan59

  • Posts: 1208
  • Gough, Gough White Sox!!!
    • John R. Russell, Ltd.
Re: 2012 World Series Discussion Thread
« Reply #34: October 24, 2012, 11:54:33 PM »
Pablo is the second heaviest man to hit three HRs in a single World Series game.  The Babe outweighed him by 11 pounds.

Online imref

  • Posts: 42522
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Re: 2012 World Series Discussion Thread
« Reply #35: October 24, 2012, 11:54:51 PM »
That stadium is just amazing.

I attended a game there in April of 2011, it's a really great experience.  The garlic fries are very good.  But dress warmly.

Online imref

  • Posts: 42522
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Re: 2012 World Series Discussion Thread
« Reply #36: October 25, 2012, 11:58:27 AM »

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: 2012 World Series Discussion Thread
« Reply #37: October 25, 2012, 08:29:15 PM »
Awful slide by Fielder. He slid towards the glove side providing a LARGE target for the tag. He should've slid head first away from the glove side.

Offline KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 16254
  • pissy DC sports fan
Re: 2012 World Series Discussion Thread
« Reply #38: October 25, 2012, 08:38:34 PM »
I attended a game there in April of 2011, it's a really great experience.  The garlic fries are very good.  But dress warmly.

Or just drink lots of beer. :)

Offline KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 16254
  • pissy DC sports fan
Re: 2012 World Series Discussion Thread
« Reply #39: October 25, 2012, 08:39:01 PM »
Awful slide by Fielder. He slid towards the glove side providing a LARGE target for the tag. He should've slid head first away from the glove side.

Wilson Ramos would have missed him anyway.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: 2012 World Series Discussion Thread
« Reply #40: October 25, 2012, 08:46:50 PM »
Wilson Ramos would have missed him anyway.

I disagree. Ramos would've definitely tagged him. But with an empty glove.  :?

Offline lastobjective

  • Posts: 4751
  • Natitude
Re: 2012 World Series Discussion Thread
« Reply #41: October 25, 2012, 09:10:55 PM »
That was a terrible camera angle for that steal.

Also, yawn.

Offline lastobjective

  • Posts: 4751
  • Natitude
Re: 2012 World Series Discussion Thread
« Reply #42: October 25, 2012, 09:19:04 PM »
Romo giggles as much as a schoolgirl, geez.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: 2012 World Series Discussion Thread
« Reply #43: October 25, 2012, 09:21:06 PM »
:wtf:

Offline lastobjective

  • Posts: 4751
  • Natitude
Re: 2012 World Series Discussion Thread
« Reply #44: October 25, 2012, 09:23:54 PM »
Half of his interview was him laughing/giggling. Nervous energy maybe, but he just seems like a really silly/happy dude... it was just odd :lol: if I was in his situation I would probably be going nuts...

Offline lastobjective

  • Posts: 4751
  • Natitude
Re: 2012 World Series Discussion Thread
« Reply #45: October 25, 2012, 09:25:45 PM »
6Ks in 5 innings for Bumgardner.

Offline houston-nat

  • Posts: 19050
Re: 2012 World Series Discussion Thread
« Reply #46: October 25, 2012, 09:32:39 PM »
Awful slide by Fielder. He slid towards the glove side providing a LARGE target for the tag.

Prince Fielder is always a large target for the tag ;)

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 63104
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: 2012 World Series Discussion Thread
« Reply #47: October 25, 2012, 09:52:57 PM »
MLB baserunners are so dumb.

Offline nfotiu

  • Posts: 5041
Re: 2012 World Series Discussion Thread
« Reply #48: October 25, 2012, 10:15:13 PM »
Why is it that fat guys like fielder even look faster than Morse.

Offline lastobjective

  • Posts: 4751
  • Natitude
Re: 2012 World Series Discussion Thread
« Reply #49: October 25, 2012, 10:22:35 PM »
Why is it that fat guys like fielder even look faster than Morse.

Morse is fat with muscle.