Author Topic: 10th overall pick  (Read 12575 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: 10th overall pick
« Reply #75: June 04, 2009, 09:51:43 PM »
Let's hear it. Go on record, who do you want the Nats to take with the 10th overall pick?

I'm all about Mike Leake. :az:

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: 10th overall pick
« Reply #76: June 04, 2009, 10:10:24 PM »
Quote
Ben Goessling of the Washington Times confirms what I had heard rumored, Kennesaw State RHP Chad Jenkins and Stanford RHP Drew Storen were at Nationals Park for a workout today. Jenkins and Storen are names we had heard over the last couple of weeks.

Jenkins is described as a big-bodied right-hander. PGCC has this scouting report “he throws in the low-90s … with two-seam tailing action on his fastball. His other pitches-an 82-83 mph slider, an 85-mph cutter and an effectively-fading high-70s change-were all solid big-league average. He displayed unusually good control, but his lack of command may get him in trouble in pro ball as he leaves too many balls over the plate”

Storen’s scouting report from MiLB.com … “has the stuff to be a starter and it’s not unheard of for a team to take a college closer and let him start as a pro. That being said, there’s a reason Stanford has him in the bullpen … his command hasn’t always been sharp. Even as a short reliever, though, his fastball-curve mix is more than enough to get hitters out, especially from the right side. Good college closers usually get drafted well and Storen should be no exception.”[/uote]

Offline PatsNats28

  • Posts: 8522
Re: 10th overall pick
« Reply #77: June 04, 2009, 10:50:45 PM »
i dont want either of those guys at 10. jenkins maybe...

Offline KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 16259
  • pissy DC sports fan
Re: 10th overall pick
« Reply #78: June 04, 2009, 11:01:31 PM »
Let's hear it. Go on record, who do you want the Nats to take with the 10th overall pick?

I'm all about Mike Leake. :az:
I'm down for Leake as well.

Offline PatsNats28

  • Posts: 8522
Re: 10th overall pick
« Reply #79: June 04, 2009, 11:03:24 PM »
I'm down for Leake as well.

idk, he sounds like a guy who should go in the late teens or 20s.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: 10th overall pick
« Reply #80: June 04, 2009, 11:06:31 PM »
idk, he sounds like a guy who should go in the late teens or 20s.
have you seen his numbers?

124.2 IP 71 H 19 R 17 ER 20 BB 143 K 2 HR (15-1, 1.23 ERA, 0.73 WHIP, .169 BA Against, 10.32 K/9)

That's going against Pac-10 Competition too.

Offline Smithian

  • Posts: 11543
  • Sunshine Squad 2024
Re: 10th overall pick
« Reply #81: June 04, 2009, 11:55:10 PM »
I want Mike Leake and then I want him brough along slowly in the minors instead of fast tracking him like we do every other of our good young pitchers.

Offline PatsNats28

  • Posts: 8522
Re: 10th overall pick
« Reply #82: June 05, 2009, 02:25:02 AM »
have you seen his numbers?

124.2 IP 71 H 19 R 17 ER 20 BB 143 K 2 HR (15-1, 1.23 ERA, 0.73 WHIP, .169 BA Against, 10.32 K/9)

That's going against Pac-10 Competition too.

I was reading some scouting reports on him, and he seems to max out as a good #2 or #3 for you.

Offline JMW IV

  • Posts: 11345
  • Name on the Front > Name on The Back
Re: 10th overall pick
« Reply #83: June 05, 2009, 10:27:28 AM »
what is it with this franchise and pitchers with command issues? sounds like we are going signability at 10, not best available.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: 10th overall pick
« Reply #84: June 05, 2009, 10:30:50 AM »
I was reading some scouting reports on him, and he seems to max out as a good #2 or #3 for you.
Nothing wrong with that. This guy can pitch.

Offline PatsNats28

  • Posts: 8522
Re: 10th overall pick
« Reply #85: June 05, 2009, 11:57:32 AM »
what is it with this franchise and pitchers with command issues? sounds like we are going signability at 10, not best available.

agreed. there is better talent at #10.

Offline KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 16259
  • pissy DC sports fan
Re: 10th overall pick
« Reply #86: June 05, 2009, 01:42:53 PM »
Nothing wrong with that. This guy can pitch.
If Zimmermann, Strasburg, and Detwiler become what they're supposed to be, then Mike Leake would be tremendously valuable if he were merely a good #2/3.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: 10th overall pick
« Reply #87: June 05, 2009, 02:14:41 PM »
If Zimmermann, Strasburg, and Detwiler become what they're supposed to be, then Mike Leake would be tremendously valuable if he were merely a good #2/3.
If they take that closer or Jenkins or one of the mediocre hitters outside of Green it would suck.

People are saying Gibson's velocity has dropped significantly lately. I'd pass on him. He doesn't throw that hard to begin with. Leake is clearly better.

Does anyone know if Leake is pitching against Clemson on ESPNU tomorrow night?

Offline Burgess

  • Posts: 488
  • K MONSTER!
Re: 10th overall pick
« Reply #88: June 05, 2009, 03:49:11 PM »
79/211 (.374 BA/.435/.569), 19 Doubles, 5 Triples, 4 HRs, 32 RBIs, 20 BB, 38 Ks.

18 Errors in the field.



Obp of .435? I like.

Offline PatsNats28

  • Posts: 8522
Re: 10th overall pick
« Reply #89: June 05, 2009, 04:05:21 PM »
If Zimmermann, Strasburg, and Detwiler become what they're supposed to be, then Mike Leake would be tremendously valuable if he were merely a good #2/3.

True. But our system has much better pitching than hitting... I don't know. It really sucks that there isn't a lot of hitting talent in this draft.

Offline KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 16259
  • pissy DC sports fan
Re: 10th overall pick
« Reply #90: June 05, 2009, 04:31:47 PM »
True. But our system has much better pitching than hitting... I don't know. It really sucks that there isn't a lot of hitting talent in this draft.
That's what trades are for.  Look at the Rays this offseason.  They were stacked with pitching, so they traded Edwin Jackson for Matt Joyce.

Offline PatsNats28

  • Posts: 8522
Re: 10th overall pick
« Reply #91: June 05, 2009, 05:02:55 PM »
That's what trades are for.  Look at the Rays this offseason.  They were stacked with pitching, so they traded Edwin Jackson for Matt Joyce.

Is that a good thing? Edwin Jackson is owning in Detroit.

Offline houston-nat

  • Posts: 19050
Re: 10th overall pick
« Reply #92: June 05, 2009, 06:39:02 PM »
Is that a good thing? Edwin Jackson is owning in Detroit.
They could have traded him for someone better. Or they could have traded Andy Sonnanstine. A surplus is a surplus ... though mismanaging a surplus is something the Nationals might excel in, as well (see: outfield).

Offline KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 16259
  • pissy DC sports fan
Re: 10th overall pick
« Reply #93: June 05, 2009, 07:17:54 PM »
Is that a good thing? Edwin Jackson is owning in Detroit.
Few people could have foreseen that, but the point is that you can always trade from depth and get something in return.  Joyce may end up doing well for them.

Offline Smithian

  • Posts: 11543
  • Sunshine Squad 2024
Re: 10th overall pick
« Reply #94: June 05, 2009, 09:22:48 PM »
Is that a good thing? Edwin Jackson is owning in Detroit.
Who exactly would have predicted that?

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: 10th overall pick
« Reply #95: June 06, 2009, 08:34:34 PM »
Quote
Notre Dame outfielder A.J. Pollock was at Nats Park this afternoon for a pre-draft workout. Pollock took BP at about 3 p.m. today, as just about everybody in the Nats scouting/player development department watched from behind the cages or along the first base line. Even Mark Lerner emerged. (First time all homestand I've seen him.) Who else was watching? Acting GM Mike Rizzo; scouting director Dana Brown; crosscheckers Marteese Robinson, Jimmy Gonzalez and Kris Kline; Florida-based scout Paul Tinnel; assistant GM Bob Boone; assistant director of player development Mark Scialabba; and director of baseball operations Brian Parker. Rick Eckstein and Manny Acta were also out on the field. As Pollock hit, a few current Nats -- Willingham, Willie Harris, Josh Bard and Elijah Dukes -- took early BP. At one point, Eckstein and Boone pulled Pollock aside and offered some pointers. Pollock, rated by Baseball America as the 23rd-ranked overall prospect, is described as "one of the safer bats due to steady, consistent swing and pro approach."

targeting him for the 50th overall pick?

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: 10th overall pick
« Reply #96: June 06, 2009, 10:05:49 PM »
Leake is pitching against Clemson right now on ESPNU.

so far. 4 IP 3 H 1 R 1 ER 1 BB 4 K.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: 10th overall pick
« Reply #97: June 06, 2009, 11:12:19 PM »
I was kind of underwhelmed by Leake tonight after watching him. Tops around 91 but most of his fastballs sit at 88.

Throws a lot sliders/change-ups.

I'm kind of surprised that he put up the numbers that he did during the regular season. This was by the numbers his worst start this season so maybe this was just an off night.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: 10th overall pick
« Reply #98: June 06, 2009, 11:59:49 PM »
Leake finished strong and picked up the win to improve to 16-1 on the season. You can't really argue with the results he has put up this year.

8 IP 8 H 4 R 3 ER 1 BB 7 K.

We could do much worse than select Leake with the 10th pick. I heard Kyle Gibson was diagnosed with an injury and he will plummet in the draft.

Offline PatsNats28

  • Posts: 8522
Re: 10th overall pick
« Reply #99: June 07, 2009, 02:31:51 AM »
Leake finished strong and picked up the win to improve to 16-1 on the season. You can't really argue with the results he has put up this year.

8 IP 8 H 4 R 3 ER 1 BB 7 K.

We could do much worse than select Leake with the 10th pick. I heard Kyle Gibson was diagnosed with an injury and he will plummet in the draft.

I like him, maybe we could get him in the 2nd round.