So do you actually buy into that self-aggrandizing BS? Or are you just "reporting"? IMO it's asinine for anyone to claim that getting rid of Dunn contributed - in whole or in part - to turning around a franchise with a solid decade of mediocrity under its belt. That's just the kind of logic I'd expect to hear from someone like Sportsfan.
It's really a bunch of BS 99% of the time. How did getting rid of Dukes, Milledge, FLop, LoDuca help the Nats other than getting rid of their awful on-field play? We should be a good team by now according to some who believed that garbage.