Author Topic: LaRoche re-signs with Nats  (Read 4572 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Minty Fresh

  • Posts: 20386
  • BOOM!
Re: LaRoche re-signs with Nats
« Reply #25: January 08, 2013, 02:09:44 PM »
You can disagree all you want. Stats are quite clear.

ALR 2012 OPS: .853
MM 2011 OPS: .910

ALR Career OPS: .820
MM Career OPS: .839

ALR Last 3 healthy seasons: .828
MM Last 3 healthy seasons: .861 (and that includes all of last year)

Morse is clearly a better hitter.

Better hitter = Better firstbaseman

If not, James Loney and Casey Kotchman would not be failures.
Please. Morse is beloved by fans. Or did you miss the part where an entire freaking stadium was singing his walk up song AFTER the music had cut out? Or how he had tshirts named "Beast Mode""

LaRoche hits lefty.

Offline Ray D

  • Posts: 10073
Re: LaRoche re-signs with Nats
« Reply #26: January 08, 2013, 02:12:46 PM »
Or did you miss the part where an entire freaking stadium was singing his walk up song AFTER the music had cut out?

Only because he selected a singable song.  You can't sing that goober garbage that LaRoche likes. 

Offline Glockypoo

  • Posts: 974
Re: LaRoche re-signs with Nats
« Reply #27: January 08, 2013, 02:15:18 PM »
Only because he selected a singable song.  You can't sing that goober garbage that LaRoche likes. 

If only ALR had picked MMMBop by Hanson for his walk-up music, then this move would have been unanimously loved by our fanbase. 

Offline FrankenMonkey

  • Posts: 16
Re: LaRoche re-signs with Nats
« Reply #28: January 08, 2013, 02:19:23 PM »
Only because he selected a singable song.  You can't sing that goober garbage that LaRoche likes. 

Maybe Adam could walk up to something like Come On Eileen or Sister Christian?  :lol:

Offline Ray D

  • Posts: 10073
Re: LaRoche re-signs with Nats
« Reply #29: January 08, 2013, 02:23:26 PM »
What about ALR's ability to keep the lineup from being too lefty heavy?


You meant Righty heavy I presume.   Anyway, to me, it's a critical factor.  I think you can argue their relative merits either way, but without LaRoche, as I saw it there was only one "effective" lefty in the lineup.  (I don't count Span because as leadoff he isn't protecting anyone.)   I think it is important to have a #2 lefty and a lefty batting after Zimmerman. Without LaRoche, you'd almost have to bat Harper #4. Now you can keep him at #2 and bat LaRoche #4.

My biggest problem with all this is where are you going to bat Werth?  Almost has to be #5, and he really hasn't proved effective batting in the bottom half of the order.    I really do wish we hadn't acquired Span, and that we were going with the 2012 lineup.



Offline Glockypoo

  • Posts: 974
Re: LaRoche re-signs with Nats
« Reply #30: January 08, 2013, 02:24:01 PM »
You meant Righty heavy I presume.   Anyway, to me, it's a critical factor.  I think you can argue their relative merits either way, but without LaRoche, as I saw it there was only one "effective" lefty in the lineup.  (I don't count Span because as leadoff he isn't protecting anyone.)   I think it is important to have a #2 lefty and a lefty batting after Zimmerman. Without LaRoche, you'd almost have to bat Harper #4. Now you can keep him at #2 and bat LaRoche #4.

My biggest problem with all this is where are you going to bat Werth?  Almost has to be #5, and he really hasn't proved effective batting in the bottom half of the order.    I really do wish we hadn't acquired Span, and that we were going with the 2012 lineup.


Yessir, thanks.

Offline Ray D

  • Posts: 10073
Re: LaRoche re-signs with Nats
« Reply #31: January 08, 2013, 02:28:01 PM »
Ray - It is one of two things.  Either the Nats have to pay $2MM to walk away in any event or the Nats pay $2MM to walk away only if ALR wants to exercise it.  I'm not sure if the Nats are on the hook if ALR wants to walk away.
It means Laroche gets $2 million either way. If he opts out the team owes him $2 million. If the team opts out they owe him $2 million. It's just a guarantee of extra money that they are delaying for another year. He won't be back after 2014.
Spidey is probably right.

The part that doesn't make sense to me is, if he opts out the Nats are on the hook?

So, assuming they have a mutual option, for say 10M, and after 2014 the Nats exercise the option and LaRoche declines. I can't see how the Nats could be on the hook for 2M.

Offline Tyler Durden

  • Posts: 7970
  • Leprechaun
Re: LaRoche re-signs with Nats
« Reply #32: January 08, 2013, 02:31:28 PM »
You meant Righty heavy I presume.   Anyway, to me, it's a critical factor.  I think you can argue their relative merits either way, but without LaRoche, as I saw it there was only one "effective" lefty in the lineup.  (I don't count Span because as leadoff he isn't protecting anyone.)   I think it is important to have a #2 lefty and a lefty batting after Zimmerman. Without LaRoche, you'd almost have to bat Harper #4. Now you can keep him at #2 and bat LaRoche #4.

My biggest problem with all this is where are you going to bat Werth?  Almost has to be #5, and he really hasn't proved effective batting in the bottom half of the order.    I really do wish we hadn't acquired Span, and that we were going with the 2012 lineup.




Span
Werth
Harper
Zim
LaRoche
Desmond
Espinosa
Suzuki/Ramos

Offline Smithian

  • Posts: 11551
  • Sunshine Squad 2024
Re: LaRoche re-signs with Nats
« Reply #33: January 08, 2013, 02:34:43 PM »
They should suck it up and keep Morse, IMO. Play him three out of four days. Give Werth, Harper/Span(alternate), and LaRoche days off. Whoever is off for the day is a big time bench option. Someone always gets hurt and this would help keep LaRoche and Werth fresh.

Know it won't happen but one can dream.

Offline DPMOmaha

  • Posts: 22875
Re: LaRoche re-signs with Nats
« Reply #34: January 08, 2013, 02:41:37 PM »
You can disagree all you want. Stats are quite clear.

ALR 2012 OPS: .853
MM 2011 OPS: .910

ALR Career OPS: .820
MM Career OPS: .839

ALR Last 3 healthy seasons: .828
MM Last 3 healthy seasons: .861 (and that includes all of last year)

Morse is clearly a better hitter.

Better hitter = Better firstbaseman

If not, James Loney and Casey Kotchman would not be failures.
Please. Morse is beloved by fans. Or did you miss the part where an entire freaking stadium was singing his walk up song AFTER the music had cut out? Or how he had tshirts named "Beast Mode""
LaRoche hits lefty.
He also actually hits.  Loney and Kotchman are big holes in their teams lineups.  LaR isn't.  Morse is a very good hitter with decent defense at 1B.  LaRoche is a good hitter with very good defense.  It's not like we're trading Morse for Loney or Kotchman, we're trading a guy  who actually produces on both aspects of the game.  Not a great comparison with LaRoche, Loney and Kotchman to Morse.

Offline Rasta

  • Posts: 1515
Re: LaRoche re-signs with Nats
« Reply #35: January 08, 2013, 02:43:51 PM »
I love Morse but something you also have to consider is that he's been injured a lot.  He played in 102 games last year.  He's never played more than that except in 2011 with the Nats. 

Offline Ray D

  • Posts: 10073
Re: LaRoche re-signs with Nats
« Reply #36: January 08, 2013, 02:49:47 PM »
Span
Werth
Harper
Zim
LaRoche
Desmond
Espinosa
Suzuki/Ramos

I'd rather #2 be lefthanded.  And I don't think there's any way they're moving Zimmerman out of #3.

Offline terpfan417

  • Posts: 301
Re: LaRoche re-signs with Nats
« Reply #37: January 08, 2013, 02:52:04 PM »
They should suck it up and keep Morse, IMO. Play him three out of four days. Give Werth, Harper/Span(alternate), and LaRoche days off. Whoever is off for the day is a big time bench option. Someone always gets hurt and this would help keep LaRoche and Werth fresh.

Know it won't happen but one can dream.
I really don't hate this and think we should at least threaten it, if only for leverage in dealing him. Having Moore and Morse both on the bench isnt ideal (maybe Moore gets sent back to the minors) but I think you could definitely find plenty of time to play Morse. He could spell 1B or any of the OF positions, including coming in to play against all lefty starters, since 3 of those 4 positions are left handed. And that's not even accounting for the inevitable time missed for injuries by one of those 4 guys

Offline houston-nat

  • Posts: 19050
Re: LaRoche re-signs with Nats
« Reply #38: January 08, 2013, 02:55:11 PM »
Span
Werth
Harper
Zim
LaRoche
Desmond
Espinosa
Suzuki/Ramos

Werth
Harper
Zimmerman
LaRoche
Desmond
Espinosa
Suzuki/Ramos
pitcher
Span

Offline Ed Stroud

  • Posts: 80
Re: LaRoche re-signs with Nats
« Reply #39: January 08, 2013, 02:59:40 PM »
Quote from: Tyler Durden on Today at 02:31:28 PM

    Span
    Werth
    Harper
    Zim
    LaRoche
    Desmond
    Espinosa
    Suzuki/Ramos

Werth
Harper
Zimmerman
LaRoche
Desmond
Espinosa
Suzuki/Ramos
pitcher
Span

Either way, I like it.

Offline Tyler Durden

  • Posts: 7970
  • Leprechaun
Re: LaRoche re-signs with Nats
« Reply #40: January 08, 2013, 03:03:52 PM »
I'd rather #2 be lefthanded.  And I don't think there's any way they're moving Zimmerman out of #3.

So flip Werth and Span.  Why wouldn't they move Zim out of the 3 spot?  They are talking about him moving off of third base so I would imagine his spot in the order is not written in stone.

Offline DPMOmaha

  • Posts: 22875
Re: LaRoche re-signs with Nats
« Reply #41: January 08, 2013, 03:04:37 PM »
Werth
Harper
Zimmerman
LaRoche
Desmond
Espinosa
Suzuki/Ramos
pitcher
Span
I don't think Davey would ever go that route.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37394
Re: LaRoche re-signs with Nats
« Reply #42: January 08, 2013, 03:06:54 PM »
slateman needs to stop posting

Offline Ray D

  • Posts: 10073
Re: LaRoche re-signs with Nats
« Reply #43: January 08, 2013, 03:08:27 PM »
Werth
Harper
Zimmerman
LaRoche
Desmond
Espinosa
Suzuki/Ramos
pitcher
Span

The fact that this is even suggested indicates to me what a mistake it was to acquire Span.   Geniuses (like LaRussa) that bat the pitcher eighth (or imitators like Riggleman)  usually put a "secondary" leadoff batter ninth, not the primary. And I'm not even saying that this lineup is a bad idea.   But it suggests to me that Span is not a typical leadoff man, and it that's so, then what was the point?

Offline nobleisthyname

  • Posts: 2789
Re: LaRoche re-signs with Nats
« Reply #44: January 08, 2013, 03:10:51 PM »
The fact that this is even suggested indicates to me what a mistake it was to acquire Span.   Geniuses (like LaRussa) that bat the pitcher eighth (or imitators like Riggleman)  usually put a "secondary" leadoff batter ninth, not the primary. And I'm not even saying that this lineup is a bad idea.   But it suggests to me that Span is not a typical leadoff man, and it that's so, then what was the point?

Gettin Morse out of the outfield and replacing him with a gold glove caliber defender? That's gotta be a significant swing in runs by itself.

Offline DPMOmaha

  • Posts: 22875
Re: LaRoche re-signs with Nats
« Reply #45: January 08, 2013, 03:11:06 PM »
The fact that this is even suggested indicates to me what a mistake it was to acquire Span.   Geniuses (like LaRussa) that bat the pitcher eighth (or imitators like Riggleman)  usually put a "secondary" leadoff batter ninth, not the primary. And I'm not even saying that this lineup is a bad idea.   But it suggests to me that Span is not a typical leadoff man, and it that's so, then what was the point?
Because it was brought up on here?  If it was Davey or Rizzo bringing it up, that would be one thing.  Span's the exact lead-off guy Rizzo's been looking for.

Offline Ali the Baseball Cat

  • Posts: 17674
  • babble on
Re: LaRoche re-signs with Nats
« Reply #46: January 08, 2013, 03:13:53 PM »
there ya go!!
Maybe Adam could walk up to something like Come On Eileen or Sister Christian?  :lol:

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 63339
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: LaRoche re-signs with Nats
« Reply #47: January 08, 2013, 03:14:07 PM »
LaRoche hits lefty.

So does Span and Harper. This fabled lefty power is bullcrap and you know it. Hitting is hitting.

If anything, Laroche is detrement because he's a lefty. He can't hit left handed pitchers. Span, Morse, and Harper can. Espinosa dominates lefty pitching but also switch hits so every time Laroche would be in, Espinosa would be hitting left. Same for Lombo.

So basically, this lineup has three left handed hitting starters already. Needing Laroche because he's a lefty is a strawman's arguement.

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 35131
  • World Champions!!!
Re: LaRoche re-signs with Nats
« Reply #48: January 08, 2013, 03:14:45 PM »
Span is the prototypical leadoff hitter. Just cause its brought up on WNFF doesn't mean he's not.

Fans say a lot of things.

Rizzo and Johnson know what he is, that's all that matters.

Offline Ray D

  • Posts: 10073
Re: LaRoche re-signs with Nats
« Reply #49: January 08, 2013, 03:16:00 PM »
Gettin Morse out of the outfield and replacing him with a gold glove caliber defender? That's gotta be a significant swing in runs by itself.
What is the net swing in runs?  I.e. runs saved on defense vs. those we lose by losing Morse.  My bet is it's negative.