Pages: 1 ... 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 [31] 32   Go Down

Author Topic: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)  (Read 44024 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 39971
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #750: December 20, 2011, 11:31:40 PM »
Quote from: Vega on December 20, 2011, 07:39:32 PM
Never seen this one before.

has to do with a MASN add that showed a clip of some light hitting career backup catcher hitting a home run to win a game.  I forget the guy's name though.
Logged

Offline Vega

  • Posts: 5516
  • Party’s Over
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #751: December 20, 2011, 11:34:15 PM »
Quote from: JCA-CrystalCity on December 20, 2011, 11:31:40 PM
has to do with a MASN add that showed a clip of some light hitting career backup catcher hitting a home run to win a game.  I forget the guy's name though.
Jeff Mathis hit a game winning homer in the playoffs for Anaheim a few years ago. Was that it?
Logged

Offline Coladar

  • Posts: 2826
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #752: December 21, 2011, 01:23:42 AM »
Quote from: Vega on December 20, 2011, 11:34:15 PM
Jeff Mathis hit a game winning homer in the playoffs for Anaheim a few years ago. Was that it?

Lol... Are you still serious, or just joking now? I'm hoping it's the latter.
Logged

Offline JMW IV

  • Posts: 11345
  • Name on the Front > Name on The Back
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #753: December 21, 2011, 07:45:34 AM »
Logged

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 33784
  • Hell yes!
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #754: December 21, 2011, 08:45:18 AM »
Quote from: Vega on December 20, 2011, 07:39:32 PM
Never seen this one before.

http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/recap?gameId=280425120

I couldn't locate video, apparently MLB has purged its gameday archives of 2008 games.

Nats ran a series of commercials on MASN in which fans enthusiastically talked up favorite moments.  Two of the most memorable pieces were "the Mets must HATE Willie Harris", and the "Who?" response to Wil Nieves' first career home run to walk-off vs the first place Cubs on 4/25/2008.
Logged

Online JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 39971
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #755: December 21, 2011, 11:06:30 AM »
Dammit.  I have a great straight line out there and it's left dangling. 

I hate Wil Nieves!
Logged

Offline JMUalumni

  • Posts: 7787
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #756: December 21, 2011, 11:08:01 AM »
Here, Vega.  This is the Nieves commercial:

Logged

Offline PatsNats28

  • Posts: 8522
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #757: December 21, 2011, 12:35:32 PM »
:rofl:
Logged

Offline MarquisDeSade

  • Posts: 15101
  • Captain Sadness
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #758: December 21, 2011, 12:37:16 PM »
Oh god, that guy sits in my new section.
Logged

Online imref

  • Posts: 43115
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #759: December 22, 2011, 01:15:20 PM »
Marquis to the Twins.  Goessling must be the GM there now (Marquis, Hammer, Capps).  Can Pudge be far behind?
Logged

Offline Vega

  • Posts: 5516
  • Party’s Over
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #760: December 22, 2011, 02:03:20 PM »
Quote from: JMUalumni on December 21, 2011, 11:08:01 AM
Here, Vega.  This is the Nieves commercial:


Massive lol! They're mocking their own player in a commercial! Awesome!
Logged

Offline Mr Clean

  • Posts: 4109
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #761: December 22, 2011, 03:12:52 PM »
Quote from: imref on December 22, 2011, 01:15:20 PM
Marquis to the Twins.  Goessling must be the GM there now (Marquis, Hammer, Capps).  Can Pudge be far behind?

Marquis getting 3 million according to Bowden. Way too much for a mediocre pitcher.
Logged

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 35131
  • World Champions!!!
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #762: December 22, 2011, 03:24:32 PM »
Quote from: Mr Clean on December 22, 2011, 03:12:52 PM
Marquis getting 3 million according to Bowden. Way too much for a mediocre pitcher.

He was worth about 6.2 million last year. Seems like a steal for Terry Ryan.
Logged

Offline Vega

  • Posts: 5516
  • Party’s Over
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #763: December 22, 2011, 03:46:31 PM »
Marquis is an utter bargain at three million.
Logged

Online JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 39971
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #764: December 22, 2011, 05:11:59 PM »
Quote from: Vega on December 22, 2011, 03:46:31 PM
Marquis is an utter bargain at three million.

+1, except not in bold or tomato
Logged

Offline RobDibblesGhost

  • Posts: 31446
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #765: December 23, 2011, 05:12:28 PM »
Langerhans to the Angels
Logged

Offline houston-nat

  • Posts: 19050
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #766: December 23, 2011, 05:52:57 PM »
Quote from: RobDibblesGhost on December 23, 2011, 05:12:28 PM
Langerhans to the Angels

Wow, if that's their big offseason move I don't know how they expect to compete.
Logged

Offline blue911

  • Posts: 18488
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #767: December 23, 2011, 06:10:13 PM »
Quote from: houston-nat on December 23, 2011, 05:52:57 PM
Wow, if that's their big offseason move I don't know how they expect to compete.

Where's Albert going to play?
Logged

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #768: December 23, 2011, 06:15:36 PM »
:lmao:

Besides, it's not like we have much room to laugh at that move. Langerhans type players were usually our big off season acquisitions.
Logged

Offline PatsNats28

  • Posts: 8522
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #769: December 23, 2011, 09:19:10 PM »
Langerhans was actually okay though
Logged

Offline Nathan

  • Posts: 10726
  • Wow. Such warnings. Very baseball. Moderator Doge.
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #770: December 24, 2011, 01:08:31 AM »
Quote from: PatsNats28 on December 23, 2011, 09:19:10 PM
Langerhans was actually okay though

We traded him for Morse, right?
Logged

Offline PatsNats28

  • Posts: 8522
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #771: December 24, 2011, 01:15:58 AM »
Ya. Obviously we won the trade but langerhans is still a decent player.
Logged

Offline Obed_Marsh

  • Posts: 7593
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #772: December 24, 2011, 07:58:01 AM »
Quote from: PatsNats28 on December 24, 2011, 01:15:58 AM
Ya. Obviously we won the trade but langerhans is still a decent player.

If you are the type that gets wet from the flash of leather. :mg:
Logged

Offline Vega

  • Posts: 5516
  • Party’s Over
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #773: December 25, 2011, 03:34:19 AM »




Logged

Offline Nathan

  • Posts: 10726
  • Wow. Such warnings. Very baseball. Moderator Doge.
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #774: December 25, 2011, 03:43:51 AM »
:spaz: :spaz: :spaz: :spaz: :spaz:

Ugh, I like having Gio but it hurts to see that :|
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 [31] 32   Go Up