Author Topic: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2  (Read 30507 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #700: May 11, 2010, 10:20:26 PM »
So has any inning actually not ended before

If every fan leaves, does the game continue?

Offline EdStroud

  • Posts: 10139
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #701: May 11, 2010, 10:20:31 PM »
I don't know which is worst the Nationals Pen tonight or Nutrisystem sending out flyers this week with Lawrence Taylor on them.

Offline cmdterps44

  • Posts: 15551
  • Future
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #702: May 11, 2010, 10:20:49 PM »
This does not bode well for my finals tomorrow.

This. I have off tomorrow but I was thinking about staying in and reading a book I need to have done by friday... freak that. I think ima go out. I cant be angry while reading a book. Ill forget everything.

Offline JMW IV

  • Posts: 11345
  • Name on the Front > Name on The Back
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #703: May 11, 2010, 10:20:52 PM »
both bruney and batista should be gone tomorrow. we don't have time for this crap.

I am tired of watching them pitch and I dislike their auras.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #704: May 11, 2010, 10:20:53 PM »
Why not leave Clippard in to pitch the intentional walk, and then bring in Batista?
You have a reliever throw for balls on purpose and then want him to throw strikes with the bases loaded.

Yeah exactly.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #705: May 11, 2010, 10:21:18 PM »
I'm disgusted at this performance. All those stranded runners don't help either. We deserved to get laughed at by Mets fans.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #706: May 11, 2010, 10:21:31 PM »
I don't know which is worst the Nationals Pen tonight or Nutrisystem sending out flyers this week with Lawrence Taylor on them.

The Mets fan that celebrated by picking up his little girl and shaking her is the worst.

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 35131
  • World Champions!!!
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #707: May 11, 2010, 10:21:36 PM »
Catching ERA coming into this game.

Nieves: 3.71

Pudge: 4.66

 :stir:

Offline EdStroud

  • Posts: 10139
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #708: May 11, 2010, 10:21:46 PM »
If every fan leaves, does the game continue?
yes, but there is no sound

Offline GMUTrkstar

  • Posts: 925
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #709: May 11, 2010, 10:21:57 PM »
We're gonna need a real good start from Stammen tomorrow because this BP needs a reak after the past two days....And its becoming very clear that we need Storen up here ASAP

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #710: May 11, 2010, 10:22:00 PM »
or Nutrisystem sending out flyers this week with Lawrence Taylor on them.

Are you serious?

Offline cmdterps44

  • Posts: 15551
  • Future
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #711: May 11, 2010, 10:22:11 PM »
both bruney and batista should be gone tomorrow. we don't have time for this crap.

I am tired of watching them pitch and I dislike their auras.

You should'nt be like "Oh crap" whenever a pitcher comes to the mound. That's not good at all.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #712: May 11, 2010, 10:22:26 PM »
yes, but there is no sound


[/message board]

Offline Nathan

  • Posts: 10726
  • Wow. Such warnings. Very baseball. Moderator Doge.
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #713: May 11, 2010, 10:22:27 PM »
We're gonna need a real good start from Stammen tomorrow because this BP needs a reak after the past two days....And its becoming very clear that we need Storen up here ASAP
:rofl:

Online The Chief

  • Posts: 31799
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #714: May 11, 2010, 10:22:36 PM »
Yeah exactly.

That is not "yeah exactly" what you were saying at all :rofl:

Offline greven

  • Posts: 114
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #715: May 11, 2010, 10:23:00 PM »
Is it against the law for the nats to have a bullpen that has random guys around era of 3~4? I know its better than last year but seriously what the heck is up with these middle relievers

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #716: May 11, 2010, 10:23:02 PM »
Riggleman should have pulled a Manny and threw the game out and made Bruney pitch until he got the last 6 outs or his arm fell off.

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #717: May 11, 2010, 10:23:08 PM »
Phew

Offline cmdterps44

  • Posts: 15551
  • Future
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #718: May 11, 2010, 10:23:19 PM »
Ike Davis is whining like a little nag.

Call in the Nannys, they're crying again.

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 35131
  • World Champions!!!
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #719: May 11, 2010, 10:23:30 PM »
It's foul you moron.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #720: May 11, 2010, 10:23:39 PM »
That wasn't even close.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #721: May 11, 2010, 10:23:43 PM »
That is not "yeah exactly" what you were saying at all :rofl:

It was an agreement, jeez. Davis, sit your ass down you clown.

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #722: May 11, 2010, 10:23:48 PM »
Rookie needs a comupence.

Offline EdStroud

  • Posts: 10139
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #723: May 11, 2010, 10:23:52 PM »
Are you serious?
Got one in the mail today

Offline Salamander Man

  • Posts: 316
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #724: May 11, 2010, 10:23:55 PM »
Ike Davis, good hitter, not very bright.