Author Topic: Reds get the Smiley Gonzalez Treatment  (Read 549 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline comish4lif

  • Posts: 2934
  • Too Stressed to care.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Reds get the Smiley Gonzalez Treatment
« Reply #1: July 20, 2011, 03:16:31 PM »
What a loser, horse roids and a fake birthday?

Offline houston-nat

  • Posts: 19050
Re: Reds get the Smiley Gonzalez Treatment
« Reply #2: July 21, 2011, 03:33:24 AM »
I thought this was going to say "Aroldis Chapman revealed to be 34-year-old woman"

Online HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21643
Re: Reds get the Smiley Gonzalez Treatment
« Reply #3: July 21, 2011, 11:53:37 AM »
Quote
Rodriguez had signed with the Reds for $2.5 million out of Venezuela in 2008.

when faced with abject poverty, it seems to have worked for him.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37394
Re: Reds get the Smiley Gonzalez Treatment
« Reply #4: July 21, 2011, 12:07:00 PM »
I thought this was going to say "Aroldis Chapman revealed to be 34-year-old woman"

he's not?

Offline Tyler Durden

  • Posts: 7970
  • Leprechaun
Re: Reds get the Smiley Gonzalez Treatment
« Reply #5: July 21, 2011, 12:16:22 PM »
when faced with abject poverty, it seems to have worked for him.

Yep.

And - this is just part of the cost of doing business in the international free agency arena.  You have to accept that extra bit of risk that guys are lying about age or injury history or whatever.  The incentive to escape poverty is just too much.

Add that to the higher signing bonuses and it really makes using the regular draft to build your team look a lot better.  I'd rather they keep signing over slot guys in the draft.

That being said - the Nats can't afford to ignore international free agency.  We're still several years behind other teams due to the great MLB selloff before the Lerners as well as the Lerner/Bowden/Kasten mistakes in their first few years. 

NFA Brian talked about signing lots of guys for lower bonuses rather than going all in on 2 or 3 players.  That seems to make sense to me.