Author Topic: Washington Redskins Thread (2011)  (Read 50930 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 63326
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2011)
« Reply #2600: December 12, 2011, 03:22:02 PM »


So after watching that vid, does anyone else think that Offensive Pass Interference was the right call? It looks  like Moss literally shoves the Pats "DB"

Moss is apparently complaining about the refs. Guess he forgot the drops he had ...

Offline InsaneBoost

  • Posts: 1479
  • Censored
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2011)
« Reply #2601: December 12, 2011, 03:33:26 PM »
It was the right call. Moss just doesn't know the rules and has become an idiot over the last couple of years. Two games in a row he's cost the Redskins, hope he's gone next season.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2011)
« Reply #2602: December 12, 2011, 04:25:11 PM »

I also like the idea of signing Flynn as a FA,

Flynn may end up being this season's Scott Mitchell.  :?  It never ceases to amaze me how people are willing to make such a crucial determination off of one freaking game (a game in which he threw a crucial interception at the end of the game that essentially lost the game).

If Griffin is over 6', then I want him.


How dumb is it to base this on whether the player is an inch shorter or taller?  :lmao:

 
I would not at all be shocked if Shanny selects him.

I would be completely shocked.


Offline 24 Nats

  • Posts: 168
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2011)
« Reply #2603: December 12, 2011, 04:46:49 PM »

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 63326
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2011)
« Reply #2604: December 12, 2011, 05:57:34 PM »
Luck is.supposedly 6'3" or 6'4" .... Griffin looks over 6' to me.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2011)
« Reply #2605: December 12, 2011, 06:15:51 PM »
You'd draft him number one based on that and later learn that he was wearing elevator shoes and immediately look to trade him.  :lmao:

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 63326
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2011)
« Reply #2606: December 12, 2011, 06:23:42 PM »
You'd draft him number one based on that and later learn that he was wearing elevator shoes and immediately look to trade him.  :lmao:

Well, that and an official measurement at the Combine ....

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2011)
« Reply #2607: December 12, 2011, 06:26:50 PM »
I just don't see why height should be such a difference maker in your book since you are so high on him to begin with. If you think the man can play who gives a crap if he is 6' or 6'1"?

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 63326
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2011)
« Reply #2608: December 12, 2011, 06:29:22 PM »
Because the number of successful NFL QBs under 6' is rather small. Brees is about it. At least in the last 20 years.

Becomes really hard to see over your 6'4" linemen.

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 33783
  • Hell yes!
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2011)
« Reply #2609: December 13, 2011, 07:41:33 AM »
Because the number of successful NFL QBs under 6' is rather small. Brees is about it. At least in the last 20 years.

Becomes really hard to see over your 6'4" linemen.

Theismann was 5'11", but used his mobility to find slots to throw through.

Offline JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 39786
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2011)
« Reply #2610: December 13, 2011, 09:20:51 AM »
Flutie

didn't Canada merge with the US sometime around the discovery of a profitable way to convert Bitumen into crude?

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 63326
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2011)
« Reply #2611: December 13, 2011, 09:34:42 AM »
Theismann was 5'11", but used his mobility to find slots to throw through.

Last 20 years. The NFL game has changed dramatically since Joe Theismann.

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 63326
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2011)
« Reply #2612: December 13, 2011, 10:07:51 AM »
LOL ... I think I got banned on ES

When I try to navigate the site, it keeps telling me the server is too busy. But if I log out, its not a problem ... :lmao:

Offline MarquisDeSade

  • Posts: 15101
  • Captain Sadness
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2011)
« Reply #2613: December 13, 2011, 10:08:34 AM »
LOL ... I think I got banned on ES

When I try to navigate the site, it keeps telling me the server is too busy. But if I log out, its not a problem ... :lmao:

Did you make funny of that "Atlanta Skins Fan" clown?

[Full Disclosure: I am "Atlanta Skins Fan"]

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 63326
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2011)
« Reply #2614: December 13, 2011, 10:49:54 AM »
Sure  you are ....

Offline MarquisDeSade

  • Posts: 15101
  • Captain Sadness
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2011)
« Reply #2615: December 13, 2011, 10:56:05 AM »
Sure  you are ....

You get the joke there right?  Wasn't ASF the guy that worshipped Grossman?

Offline Terpfan76

  • Posts: 3924
  • ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2011)
« Reply #2616: December 13, 2011, 11:03:52 AM »
Flynn may end up being this season's Scott Mitchell.  :?  It never ceases to amaze me how people are willing to make such a crucial determination off of one freaking game (a game in which he threw a crucial interception at the end of the game that essentially lost the game).


How dumb is it to base this on whether the player is an inch shorter or taller?  :lmao:

 
I would be completely shocked.



You're clearly the expert here, you tell us what should happen then.

Offline Terpfan76

  • Posts: 3924
  • ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2011)
« Reply #2617: December 13, 2011, 11:09:19 AM »
I think Welker will end up having a better career than Harrison... Rice, no, but the stat is still valid.

You're right that they will be compared, I just don't think it's that valid of a comparison. And Matt Barkley is a completely different guy since he's a pocket quarterback. The issue with RG3's weight is that it might cause him injury problems in the NFL as a runner.

500+ more receptions and 7,000 more yards? It's possible he'll get to the catches, but I doubt he gets to the yardage mark. He's a great player, no doubt about that.

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 63326
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2011)
« Reply #2618: December 13, 2011, 11:09:58 AM »
You get the joke there right?  Wasn't ASF the guy that worshipped Grossman?

Yea, he was. I'm pretty sure it was Kyle trying to get the fan base to like Grossman.

Offline MarquisDeSade

  • Posts: 15101
  • Captain Sadness
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2011)
« Reply #2619: December 13, 2011, 11:11:28 AM »
Yea, he was. I'm pretty sure it was Kyle trying to get the fan base to like Grossman.

You know, that, as crazy as it may sound, wouldn't surprise me to be the case.  The guy obviously had a lot of time on his hands to break all that crap down.  His "predictive model" on QBs was pretty laughable.

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21642
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2011)
« Reply #2620: December 13, 2011, 11:29:43 AM »
thinking about flynn, didn't Hanie  also look decent in the playoffs last year


Offline MarquisDeSade

  • Posts: 15101
  • Captain Sadness
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2011)
« Reply #2621: December 13, 2011, 11:30:36 AM »
thinking about flynn, didn't Hanie  also look decent in the playoffs last year

Yup, and look how well that's worked out.

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 33783
  • Hell yes!
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2011)
« Reply #2622: December 13, 2011, 11:35:48 AM »
Last 20 years. The NFL game has changed dramatically since Joe Theismann.

Yeah, I saw your comment, I didn't mean for mine to be a contradiction, but was just chipping in my two cents.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2011)
« Reply #2623: December 13, 2011, 02:26:41 PM »
You know, that, as crazy as it may sound, wouldn't surprise me to be the case. 

Maybe Mark Lerner does the same here.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2011)
« Reply #2624: December 13, 2011, 06:51:51 PM »
BTW, Polumbus played well at RT in place of Brown. And Smith also had a solid game. He did get beat on two plays (one for a sack that was crucial) but for an undrafted rookie getting his first action ever he held up nicely once he shook off the early nerves.