Author Topic: Nationals vs Reds, Game 4  (Read 31238 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 31799
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 4
« Reply #250: April 15, 2012, 02:17:46 PM »
Since my deleted post was quoted, do I get a chance to retort?  :lol:

I just left the one because his gif was funny.  Post as you will as long as it doesn't cross the line.  You've been here for years, you know me, you know what that means.

Offline imref

  • Posts: 42404
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 4
« Reply #251: April 15, 2012, 02:17:57 PM »
Ross just doesn't seem agressive today, that last ball was close.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 4
« Reply #252: April 15, 2012, 02:18:18 PM »
Nats offense and Detwiler still get blame for not doing their job, but its unfair my day at the park is ruined gc of umpires.

STFU hammonds. We were doomed the moment you started the game thread.   8)

Offline Smithian

  • Posts: 11493
  • Sunshine Squad 2022
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 4
« Reply #253: April 15, 2012, 02:18:25 PM »
Foolish optimism, sure.  I don't think anyone with a reasonably positive outlook has been trolled by anyone who isn't already widely known as such.

I'm hoping for 85 wins.

Offline BerkeleyNat

  • Posts: 5026
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 4
« Reply #254: April 15, 2012, 02:18:53 PM »
Nats offense and Detwiler still get blame for not doing their job, but its unfair my day at the park is ruined gc of umpires.

Why? The Nats will come back. Enjoy the win!

Offline BerkeleyNat

  • Posts: 5026
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 4
« Reply #255: April 15, 2012, 02:19:34 PM »
i wasn't here to see it but I hear the ump seriously freaked us in the 1st inning.  Anyone care to elaborate?

Bent us right over a barrel...........

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 31799
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 4
« Reply #256: April 15, 2012, 02:19:46 PM »
I'm hoping for 85 wins.

Okay, and?  That's almost the definition of playing it safe, all things considered.  The over/under poll was split at 85 vs 86.  You're gonna have to shine a lot harder than that if you want to get into BiL's super exclusive club ;)

Has somebody trolled you for predicting/hoping for 85 wins?

Offline Smithian

  • Posts: 11493
  • Sunshine Squad 2022
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 4
« Reply #257: April 15, 2012, 02:19:47 PM »
Why? The Nats will come back. Enjoy the win!

I support this statement.

:clap:

Nasty Nats! Team America!

Offline BerkeleyNat

  • Posts: 5026
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 4
« Reply #258: April 15, 2012, 02:20:00 PM »
Jesus the replays on those calls make me even madder.

Shocked Davey isn't ejected right now.

Manny would have been kicked out by now.

Offline Smithian

  • Posts: 11493
  • Sunshine Squad 2022
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 4
« Reply #259: April 15, 2012, 02:21:02 PM »
Okay, and?  That's almost the definition of playing it safe, all things considered.  The over/under poll was split at 85 vs 86.  You're gonna have to shine a lot harder than that if you want to get into BiL's super exclusive club ;)

Excuse me, I finger pistoled in the Bleachers at Wrigley on opening weekend.

I think BiL and the rest of the SSS have given me full membership. I think the LoD even gave me membership benefits out of respect. I transcend party lines.

:gunz:

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 4
« Reply #260: April 15, 2012, 02:21:28 PM »
Why? The Nats will come back. Enjoy the win!

Pretty sure hammonds was merely reacting the the bomb Brett Lawrie hit in Toronto to tie the birds in the bottom of the 4th. 

Offline nats2playoffs

  • Posts: 23843
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 4
« Reply #261: April 15, 2012, 02:21:38 PM »
WDCW has about a 9-second delay in its TV broadcast.  So you get an instant replay by switching between MASN-2 and channel 50.

 

The 106.7 FM radio with Charlie & Dave are only about a half second slower than the MASN-2 broadcast, so I have them on with the TV muted.  It makes it easier to do other things with the radio coverage with the TV.

Offline BerkeleyNat

  • Posts: 5026
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 4
« Reply #262: April 15, 2012, 02:21:51 PM »
Excuse me, I finger pistoled in the Bleachers at Wrigley on opening weekend.

I think BiL and the rest of the SSS have given me full membership. I think the LoD even gave me membership benefits out of respect. I transcend party lines.

:gunz:

 :clap:

Offline zimm_da_kid

  • Posts: 7931
  • The one true ace
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 4
« Reply #263: April 15, 2012, 02:22:04 PM »
wow.  even when we hit it hard we get bad luck

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 4
« Reply #264: April 15, 2012, 02:22:05 PM »
Excuse me, I finger pistoled in the Bleachers at Wrigley on opening weekend.



That's old news.   What have you done lately?   :)


Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 35128
  • World Champions!!!
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 4
« Reply #265: April 15, 2012, 02:22:13 PM »
Only people telling others how to act and be fans are SSS members.

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 31799
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 4
« Reply #266: April 15, 2012, 02:22:17 PM »
Excuse me, I finger pistoled in the Bleachers at Wrigley on opening weekend.

I think BiL and the rest of the SSS have given me full membership. I think the LoD even gave me membership benefits out of respect. I transcend party lines.

:gunz:

Smithian for President :lol:

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 4
« Reply #267: April 15, 2012, 02:22:36 PM »
Excuse me, I finger pistoled in the Bleachers at Wrigley on opening weekend.

I think BiL and the rest of the SSS have given me full membership. I think the LoD even gave me membership benefits out of respect. I transcend party lines.

:gunz:

You can take MDS' place since he defected to the SSS.

Offline Minty Fresh

  • Posts: 20386
  • BOOM!
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 4
« Reply #268: April 15, 2012, 02:22:48 PM »
Score?

Offline BerkeleyNat

  • Posts: 5026
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 4
« Reply #269: April 15, 2012, 02:22:49 PM »
Pretty sure hammonds was merely reacting the the bomb Brett Lawrie hit in Toronto to tie the birds in the bottom of the 4th. 

 :lmao:

I didn't even know he was going to Toronto. Wonder how the weather is up there?

Offline nobleisthyname

  • Posts: 2674
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 4
« Reply #270: April 15, 2012, 02:22:53 PM »
I don't think I've cut loose in that regard either, but if you can provide evidence to the contrary, go for it.

And let's not even pretend that I've reigned anybody in, or that either side hasn't egged on the other.  If anything, the shiners have been MUCH worse about this so far.

I wasn't necessarily referring to you (though I've noticed you tend to favor the pessimists over the optimists) more just an overall feeling of this board. Optimists are called condescending (which is really ironic) and naive and the pessimists are simply realists.

As for the bolded, I suppose we'll just have to agree to disagree. Outside of BiL I haven't seen any of the "shiners" be too unrestrained. The amount of people on the other side of the coin far outweighs that. But that's just the feeling I've gotten.

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 4
« Reply #271: April 15, 2012, 02:22:59 PM »
Only people telling others how to act and be fans are SSS members.

I'm just passin' through this SSS phase.

Offline Smithian

  • Posts: 11493
  • Sunshine Squad 2022
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 4
« Reply #272: April 15, 2012, 02:23:15 PM »
That's old news.   What have you done lately?   :)



...Uh.... Hm.

MDS complimented me!

Offline zimm_da_kid

  • Posts: 7931
  • The one true ace
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 4
« Reply #273: April 15, 2012, 02:23:19 PM »
leake gets breaking balls at the knees but we can't get breaking balls down the middle 

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.