Author Topic: Nationals vs Pirates, Game 2  (Read 11633 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline EdStroud

  • Posts: 10139
Re: Nationals vs Pirates, Game 2
« Reply #200: June 09, 2010, 09:50:43 PM »
and a SB
and a couple nice catches

Offline eckseid

  • Posts: 855
Re: Nationals vs Pirates, Game 2
« Reply #201: June 09, 2010, 09:52:03 PM »
Anyone else bored watching these pitchers after last night? :P The stuff Strasburg has is insane compared to everyone elses stuff.

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 31799
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Nationals vs Pirates, Game 2
« Reply #202: June 09, 2010, 09:53:11 PM »
Lol at that look from eckstein.

Serious business.

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Nationals vs Pirates, Game 2
« Reply #203: June 09, 2010, 09:53:21 PM »
Capps and Nieves.   :nervous:

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals vs Pirates, Game 2
« Reply #204: June 09, 2010, 09:53:33 PM »
Just imagine if capps gets 60 saves :shock:

Offline Kevrock

  • Posts: 13788
  • That’s gonna be a no from me, doge.
Re: Nationals vs Pirates, Game 2
« Reply #205: June 09, 2010, 09:56:31 PM »
Serious business.

Not sure why he wants to kill me...

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Nationals vs Pirates, Game 2
« Reply #206: June 09, 2010, 09:56:42 PM »
He's not good until the 3rd out, Bob.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals vs Pirates, Game 2
« Reply #207: June 09, 2010, 09:57:10 PM »
Oh COME ON

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 31799
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Nationals vs Pirates, Game 2
« Reply #208: June 09, 2010, 09:57:16 PM »
Thank god for that extra run.

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Nationals vs Pirates, Game 2
« Reply #209: June 09, 2010, 09:57:45 PM »
This is the reason I don't like defensive substitutions with leads this small.

Offline Smithian

  • Posts: 11499
  • Sunshine Squad 2022
Re: Nationals vs Pirates, Game 2
« Reply #210: June 09, 2010, 09:57:51 PM »
Dang. Capps gets absolutely no breaks.

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 31799
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Nationals vs Pirates, Game 2
« Reply #211: June 09, 2010, 09:58:23 PM »
Wow, we FINALLY got a call on a freaking check swing.

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Nationals vs Pirates, Game 2
« Reply #212: June 09, 2010, 09:58:40 PM »
That wasn't close to borderline, Rob.

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 33783
  • Hell yes!
Re: Nationals vs Pirates, Game 2
« Reply #213: June 09, 2010, 09:58:51 PM »
Dang. Capps gets absolutely no breaks.

Ha, we got the first swing call in a month.

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 31799
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Nationals vs Pirates, Game 2
« Reply #214: June 09, 2010, 09:59:02 PM »
This is the reason I don't like defensive substitutions with leads this small.

When ELSE would you use defensive subs? :hammer:

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Nationals vs Pirates, Game 2
« Reply #215: June 09, 2010, 09:59:04 PM »
Homerun coming.

Offline Smithian

  • Posts: 11499
  • Sunshine Squad 2022
Re: Nationals vs Pirates, Game 2
« Reply #216: June 09, 2010, 09:59:16 PM »
Oh no. Checked swing when he went around... Deja vu....

Offline Kevrock

  • Posts: 13788
  • That’s gonna be a no from me, doge.
Re: Nationals vs Pirates, Game 2
« Reply #217: June 09, 2010, 09:59:27 PM »
I hope Capps throws a ton of offspeed.

Offline nats2playoffs

  • Posts: 23843
Re: Nationals vs Pirates, Game 2
« Reply #218: June 09, 2010, 09:59:34 PM »
Just imagine if capps gets 60 saves :shock:

Chad Cordero got 46 with us when we had a losing record.

   

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 33783
  • Hell yes!
Re: Nationals vs Pirates, Game 2
« Reply #219: June 09, 2010, 09:59:43 PM »
Ha, we got the first swing call in a month.

Edit:  Took it away with the next one.

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Nationals vs Pirates, Game 2
« Reply #220: June 09, 2010, 09:59:43 PM »
When ELSE would you use defensive subs? :hammer:

When you have an eight-run lead.  I would never assume that a lead this small would hold.  It's not in me to make that kind of assumption.

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 31799
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Nationals vs Pirates, Game 2
« Reply #221: June 09, 2010, 10:00:03 PM »
Chad Cordero got 46 with us when we had a losing record.

   (Image removed from quote.)

.500 is not a losing record.

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 31799
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Nationals vs Pirates, Game 2
« Reply #222: June 09, 2010, 10:00:38 PM »
When you have an eight-run lead.  I would never assume that a lead this small would hold.  It's not in me to make that kind of assumption.

I think you're missing the purpose of a defensive sub :lol:

Offline Kevrock

  • Posts: 13788
  • That’s gonna be a no from me, doge.
Re: Nationals vs Pirates, Game 2
« Reply #223: June 09, 2010, 10:00:50 PM »
Random, but we don't have a real organist, do we?

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 33783
  • Hell yes!
Re: Nationals vs Pirates, Game 2
« Reply #224: June 09, 2010, 10:01:09 PM »
Chad Cordero got 46 with us when we had a losing record.

   (Image removed from quote.)

Huh?  Didn't he get 47 the year we went .500?  Almost all of those when we were above .500, too.