Author Topic: Nationals @ Cubs, Game 2  (Read 18131 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: Nationals @ Cubs, Game 2
« Reply #200: May 05, 2007, 03:06:12 PM »
Colome walks a batter, that's a surprise..

Re: Nationals @ Cubs, Game 2
« Reply #201: May 05, 2007, 03:08:32 PM »
Jesus delivers a K.

Offline Senators2005

  • Lake Ridge, VA
  • Posts: 12264
  • Go Natsssssss!
    • http://nationalsnation.spaces.live.com/
Re: Nationals @ Cubs, Game 2
« Reply #202: May 05, 2007, 03:08:45 PM »
Did you guys hear that?  142 BBs for the Nats so far this year.   :shock:

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Cubs, Game 2
« Reply #203: May 05, 2007, 03:10:04 PM »
Did you guys hear that?  142 BBs for the Nats so far this year.   :shock:

How packed would our ball park look if they gave away free tickets for every walk our pitchers yielded?

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Nationals @ Cubs, Game 2
« Reply #204: May 05, 2007, 03:10:06 PM »
Did you guys hear that?  142 BBs for the Nats so far this year.   :shock:

Four+ per game :shock:

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Nationals @ Cubs, Game 2
« Reply #205: May 05, 2007, 03:10:50 PM »
Did you guys hear that?  142 BBs for the Nats so far this year.   :shock:

Add that to the errors and double :shock:

Offline Senators2005

  • Lake Ridge, VA
  • Posts: 12264
  • Go Natsssssss!
    • http://nationalsnation.spaces.live.com/
Re: Nationals @ Cubs, Game 2
« Reply #206: May 05, 2007, 03:10:59 PM »
unreal.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: Nationals @ Cubs, Game 2
« Reply #207: May 05, 2007, 03:11:02 PM »
At least Colome and Rivera were effective today.. Jesus' slider actually looked sharp for a change

Re: Nationals @ Cubs, Game 2
« Reply #208: May 05, 2007, 03:11:45 PM »
Did you guys hear that?  142 BBs for the Nats so far this year.   :shock:

I just don't understand that.  It is so simple!  The pitchers just need to aim for the inside of that little grey transparent box!

Offline Senators2005

  • Lake Ridge, VA
  • Posts: 12264
  • Go Natsssssss!
    • http://nationalsnation.spaces.live.com/
Re: Nationals @ Cubs, Game 2
« Reply #209: May 05, 2007, 03:11:56 PM »
At least Colome and Rivera were effective today.. Jesus' slider actually looked sharp for a change
Yes, it appears Air Zimmerman can come out of hiding now.   :lol:

Offline nats2playoffs

  • Posts: 23843
Re: Nationals @ Cubs, Game 2
« Reply #210: May 05, 2007, 03:12:34 PM »
Hey I'd hold a sign up at a PCD concert proposing marriage to Nicole Scherzinger...and I would be completely serious.  And I'm already married.   :lol:

I've never heard of her.   Can she hit over .200?

Nicole Scherzinger

Re: Nationals @ Cubs, Game 2
« Reply #211: May 05, 2007, 03:13:55 PM »
Olman's Gameday photo looks like a large mouth bass fish!

Offline Senators2005

  • Lake Ridge, VA
  • Posts: 12264
  • Go Natsssssss!
    • http://nationalsnation.spaces.live.com/
Re: Nationals @ Cubs, Game 2
« Reply #212: May 05, 2007, 03:14:11 PM »
Quote from: Air Zimmerman
Two strikeouts and an unscored inning!  Where are all the Colome bashers now?  nages! 
:lol:


Offline Senators2005

  • Lake Ridge, VA
  • Posts: 12264
  • Go Natsssssss!
    • http://nationalsnation.spaces.live.com/
Re: Nationals @ Cubs, Game 2
« Reply #214: May 05, 2007, 03:15:22 PM »
I've never heard of her.   Can she hit over .200?
dunno, but she can swing my bat anyday.  :pimp:

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Nationals @ Cubs, Game 2
« Reply #215: May 05, 2007, 03:15:37 PM »
Ball 4!!!

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: Nationals @ Cubs, Game 2
« Reply #216: May 05, 2007, 03:15:41 PM »
horrible call by the umpire.. and another to Langerhans

edit: and now the same pitch is a ball

Re: Nationals @ Cubs, Game 2
« Reply #217: May 05, 2007, 03:16:19 PM »
Casto is actually spelled with a K.  Ugh.

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Nationals @ Cubs, Game 2
« Reply #218: May 05, 2007, 03:17:23 PM »
3 for 49 with 1 RBI from the pinch hitters this year, according to Don Sutton :shock:

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: Nationals @ Cubs, Game 2
« Reply #219: May 05, 2007, 03:17:54 PM »
******* disgusting.. this ump is sorry

Offline nats2playoffs

  • Posts: 23843
Re: Nationals @ Cubs, Game 2
« Reply #220: May 05, 2007, 03:18:34 PM »
At least Colome and Rivera were effective today.. Jesus' slider actually looked sharp for a change

Walking in THREE runs with the bases loaded should AUTOMATICALLY send Speigner to the minors.  Inexcusable.  He could have served up the fattest possible pitch he had available.  It might have been a flyout, but even a 3-run triple would have been better than that agony.  It is embarrassing that we'd even HAVE a pitcher on the roster who would do that...  We have CHILDREN watching this game.  What would THEY think?

 

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Nationals @ Cubs, Game 2
« Reply #221: May 05, 2007, 03:18:57 PM »
3 for 49 with 1 RBI from the pinch hitters this year, according to Don Sutton :shock:

3 for 50 :shock:

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: Nationals @ Cubs, Game 2
« Reply #222: May 05, 2007, 03:19:08 PM »
should be bases loaded and no outs.. Langerhans is now hitting .060

Re: Nationals @ Cubs, Game 2
« Reply #223: May 05, 2007, 03:19:33 PM »
Walking in THREE runs with the bases loaded should AUTOMATICALLY send Speigner to the minors.  Inexcusable.  He could have served up the fattest possible pitch he had available.  It might have been a flyout, but even a 3-run triple would have been better than that agony.  It is embarrassing that we'd even HAVE a pitcher on the roster who would do that...  We have CHILDREN watching this game.  What would THEY think?

(Image removed from quote.)  (Image removed from quote.)

Better pray Hanarahan never makes it back up here.  He does the same thing.

Offline Senators2005

  • Lake Ridge, VA
  • Posts: 12264
  • Go Natsssssss!
    • http://nationalsnation.spaces.live.com/
Re: Nationals @ Cubs, Game 2
« Reply #224: May 05, 2007, 03:20:20 PM »
3 for 50 :shock:

Yeah I mentioned this statistic in my latest blog entry.  It's just an incredible example of futility.