Author Topic: Nationals @ Giants, Game 1 (Read 33080 times)

hammondsnats · « **Reply #750:** May 12, 2009, 01:21:50 AM »

Quote from: KnorrForYourMoney on May 12, 2009, 01:20:24 AM

Josh Willingham and Daniel Cabrera both freaked up tonight. Both contributed to a loss here.

Period. End of. Enough.

Now stfu, ya little nages.

BORING!!!!!!!!!!!! BOOOOOOOO THIS MAN!!!

ronnynat · « **Reply #751:** May 12, 2009, 01:21:53 AM »

That was nasty.

ronnynat · « **Reply #752:** May 12, 2009, 01:22:07 AM »

NICE!

sportsfan882 · « **Reply #753:** May 12, 2009, 01:22:11 AM »

nice, Dukes is heating back up

Air Zimmerman · « **Reply #754:** May 12, 2009, 01:22:29 AM »

Dukes is a monster. he eats fastballs like that for breakfast.

cmdterps44 · « **Reply #755:** May 12, 2009, 01:22:36 AM »

I think Ive said this atleast 3 times now. 7 runs should win a game

Someone started it, but its ridiculous that we can score so many runs, and our bullpen sucks dick.

sportsfan882 · « **Reply #756:** May 12, 2009, 01:22:36 AM »

holy crap, Bochy has to be livid. this is freaking crazy.

here comes their closer

PC · « **Reply #757:** May 12, 2009, 01:22:40 AM »

And the Nationals have earned ALL OF THEIR RUNS!

eagleskins · « **Reply #758:** May 12, 2009, 01:22:47 AM »

This game isn't over yet. Hammer gets on, and bring Flores up for the game tying jack.

shoeshineboy · « **Reply #759:** May 12, 2009, 01:23:22 AM »

This is pathetic that the Giants are making all these pitching changes with this huge lead and 2 outs.

cmdterps44 · « **Reply #760:** May 12, 2009, 01:23:36 AM »

Make up for it Willingham! Get one more run back!

cmdterps44 · « **Reply #761:** May 12, 2009, 01:24:11 AM »

Quote from: eagleskins on May 12, 2009, 01:22:47 AM

This game isn't over yet. Hammer gets on, and bring Flores up for the game tying jack.

Hes got the shoulder stiffness. I dont think hed be able to get all of it.

sportsfan882 · « **Reply #762:** May 12, 2009, 01:24:24 AM »

Quote from: shoeshineboy on May 12, 2009, 01:23:22 AM

This is pathetic that the Giants are making all these pitching changes with this huge lead and 2 outs.

their closer Wilson threw 2 innings yesterday so pitching today should make him unavailable tomorrow.

Air Zimmerman · « **Reply #763:** May 12, 2009, 01:24:26 AM »

guys, it's over. it's been over since Willingham KILLED this game.

cmdterps44 · « **Reply #764:** May 12, 2009, 01:25:08 AM »

Quote from: Air Zimmerman on May 12, 2009, 01:24:26 AM

guys, it's over. it's been over since Willingham KILLED this game.

Its been over since Crab signed a contract and put on a nats jersey.

sportsfan882 · « **Reply #765:** May 12, 2009, 01:25:11 AM »

how fitting Willingham ends the game.

dude sucks ass

ronnynat · « **Reply #766:** May 12, 2009, 01:25:12 AM »

Damn, that was quick.

shoeshineboy · « **Reply #767:** May 12, 2009, 01:25:18 AM »

4 run deficit with 2 outs - no chance

Air Zimmerman · « **Reply #768:** May 12, 2009, 01:25:20 AM »

fitting. Willingham kills the game twice.

cmdterps44 · « **Reply #769:** May 12, 2009, 01:25:30 AM »

Quote from: cmdterps44 on May 12, 2009, 01:23:36 AM

Make up for it Willingham! Get one more run back!

Guess not.

PC · « **Reply #770:** May 12, 2009, 01:25:43 AM »

Seven runs should be enough to win...

sportsfan882 · « **Reply #771:** May 12, 2009, 01:25:45 AM »

Quote from: shoeshineboy on May 12, 2009, 01:25:18 AM

4 run deficit with 2 outs - no chance

especially with Willingham up

hammondsnats · « **Reply #772:** May 12, 2009, 01:26:22 AM »

Quote from: sportsfan882 on May 12, 2009, 01:25:11 AM

how fitting Willingham ends the game.

dude sucks ass

that's pretty knee jerk. he's hit three homers in the last two games, but his error was worse than the k at the end. he's still better than kearns.

sportsfan882 · « **Reply #773:** May 12, 2009, 01:26:47 AM »

Quote from: PC on May 12, 2009, 01:25:43 AM

Seven runs should be enough to win...

yep, we should be on a 5 game winning streak. Over these last 5 games we have scored 33 runs (6.6 runs a game) but are only 3-2.

hammondsnats · « **Reply #774:** May 12, 2009, 01:27:18 AM »

can we just sign strasburg now?