Author Topic: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2016)  (Read 71280 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline lylelgreen

  • Posts: 968
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2016)
« Reply #800: November 18, 2016, 07:25:17 PM »
the 2011 nationals outfield was laynce nix - rick ankiel - jayson werth

holy crap

The Phenomenon: Pressure, the Yips, and the Pitch that Changed My LifeHardcover – April 18, 2017
by Rick Ankiel (Author)

https://t.co/UMuoy7q55y

Offline welch

  • Posts: 16432
  • The Sweetest Right Handed Swing in 1950s Baseball
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2016)
« Reply #801: November 19, 2016, 08:26:38 PM »
The Phenomenon: Pressure, the Yips, and the Pitch that Changed My LifeHardcover – April 18, 2017
by Rick Ankiel (Author)

https://t.co/UMuoy7q55y


We all saw Ankiel backing onto the warning track, catch a fly, and throw out a runner trying to tag up and score. Threw a perfect strike.

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 35131
  • World Champions!!!

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 35131
  • World Champions!!!
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2016)
« Reply #803: November 25, 2016, 04:55:19 AM »
Bernadina signed with a Korean team.

Offline Ali the Baseball Cat

  • Posts: 17666
  • babble on
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2016)
« Reply #804: November 28, 2016, 07:19:13 PM »
Shark fin
Bernadina signed with a Korean team.

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2016)
« Reply #805: November 28, 2016, 08:20:09 PM »
Bernadina signed with a Korean team.

One of the great catches in Nats' history was The Shark goin' into the meshing/wall in Houston.

! No longer available

Online imref

  • Posts: 42980
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2016)
« Reply #806: December 01, 2016, 02:12:59 PM »
Scrabble gets a 2 year deal with the Mariners per ESPN.

Offline aspenbubba

  • Posts: 5630
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2016)
« Reply #807: December 04, 2016, 07:43:57 AM »
Scrabble gets a 2 year deal with the Mariners per ESPN.

11 mil

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21642
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2016)
« Reply #808: December 04, 2016, 12:04:19 PM »
:shock:

Offline Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 25979
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2016)
« Reply #809: December 06, 2016, 08:29:01 AM »
Tony Renda was dropped from the Reds 40 man roster.

Offline RobDibblesGhost

  • Posts: 31438
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2016)
« Reply #810: December 06, 2016, 09:17:01 PM »
Ramos to the Rays, 2 years with playing time incentives.

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2016)
« Reply #811: December 06, 2016, 09:32:34 PM »
Ramos to the Rays, 2 years with playing time incentives.

Adios

Offline Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 25979
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2016)
« Reply #812: December 07, 2016, 07:04:44 AM »
Good luck to the Buffalo.

Offline monkeyhit

  • Posts: 2603
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2016)
« Reply #813: December 07, 2016, 08:54:19 AM »
Hasta la vista, Wilson. Gonna miss you, amigo.

Offline GburgNatsFan

  • Posts: 22292
  • Let's drink a few for Mathguy.
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2016)
« Reply #814: December 07, 2016, 09:11:44 AM »
Hate to see him go, but it's the nature of baseball, and the nature of life.

Horns up, Wilson.

Offline DPMOmaha

  • Posts: 22875
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2016)
« Reply #815: December 07, 2016, 11:16:49 AM »
Ken Rosenthal ‏@Ken_Rosenthal 26s27 seconds ago

Sources: Ian Desmond to #Rockies.

Online imref

  • Posts: 42980
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2016)
« Reply #816: December 07, 2016, 11:27:09 AM »
Ken Rosenthal ‏@Ken_Rosenthal 26s27 seconds ago

Sources: Ian Desmond to #Rockies.



Multi year deal, Rockies give up #11 pick. Will play 1st and OF.  Overpay?

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21642
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2016)
« Reply #817: December 07, 2016, 11:30:24 AM »
If they flip him for someone more valuable than the 11th pick, no, and I don't think a trade package better than the 11th pick is hard to achieve

Offline GuyFromCO

  • Posts: 611
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2016)
« Reply #818: December 07, 2016, 12:09:38 PM »
If they flip him for someone more valuable than the 11th pick, no, and I don't think a trade package better than the 11th pick is hard to achieve

Trade who? Desi?

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21642
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2016)
« Reply #819: December 07, 2016, 12:10:55 PM »
You have to assume that's their plan

Offline GuyFromCO

  • Posts: 611
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2016)
« Reply #820: December 07, 2016, 12:11:20 PM »
You have to assume that's their plan

Uh....

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21642
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2016)
« Reply #821: December 07, 2016, 12:19:13 PM »
Co home games will bump his stats for a year or two, then you count on stupid at the trade deadline

Offline NJ Ave

  • Posts: 3485
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2016)
« Reply #822: December 07, 2016, 12:39:34 PM »
Co home games will bump his stats for a year or two, then you count on stupid at the trade deadline

Maybe I'm missing a bunch, but I don't remember a lot of deals Colorado has made where they got good value for hitters in trade deals because of inflated Coors numbers.

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21642
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2016)
« Reply #823: December 07, 2016, 12:46:23 PM »
I can't fathom why else they would sign him

Offline NJ Ave

  • Posts: 3485
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2016)
« Reply #824: December 07, 2016, 12:48:47 PM »
I can't fathom why else they would sign him

We agree on that :)