Author Topic: The "Real" Miss Iowa  (Read 588 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline RL04

  • Posts: 4041
The "Real" Miss Iowa
« Topic Start: August 05, 2010, 03:47:54 PM »
What I find very interesting in all this Batista-Miss Iowa stuff is that the Miss Iowa-USA person (Catherine Connors) somehow jumped to the forefront.

But there are two different Miss Iowa’s.  Not one.

The Miss Iowa from the Miss USA pageant (Connors) leads up to the Miss Universe competition.

Maybe I’m old but when I think of “Miss Iowa” I think of the Miss America pageant which has a completely different Miss Iowa … Pauli Mayfield:


http://www.missiowa.com/









Offline Evolution33

  • Posts: 5093
    • Blown Save, Win
Re: The "Real" Miss Iowa
« Reply #1: August 05, 2010, 03:49:53 PM »
Kasten worked for Billionare Ted maybe we can have a cage match between the to to settle this. Kind of like Big T face Booker T for the right to the T.

Offline Galah

  • Posts: 2859
  • 2016 - the year that everything changed, again.
Re: The "Real" Miss Iowa
« Reply #2: August 05, 2010, 03:52:47 PM »
Blame Batista, he picked Miss Universe, not Miss America...but if she wants equal time, I say, go for it, I wouldn't object to her throwing out the first pitch at a game...

Offline Potomac Cannons

  • Posts: 3279
Re: The "Real" Miss Iowa
« Reply #3: August 05, 2010, 04:04:13 PM »
Nats clearly got the better deal here.  This Miss Iowa isn't even on the same planet with Ms. Conners.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: The "Real" Miss Iowa
« Reply #4: August 05, 2010, 06:20:51 PM »
I'd have to see more evidence to make that determination but I doubt you can say this one is not even on the same planet.

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 33784
  • Hell yes!
Re: The "Real" Miss Iowa
« Reply #5: August 05, 2010, 06:43:42 PM »
I'd have to see more evidence to make that determination but I doubt you can say this one is not even on the same planet.


Evidence?  A splendid thought.  A little friendly competition is just the thing for the BWT.

Offline Potomac Cannons

  • Posts: 3279
Re: The "Real" Miss Iowa
« Reply #6: August 05, 2010, 06:51:45 PM »
Looking through available pictures of both...it's not even close.

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 33784
  • Hell yes!
Re: The "Real" Miss Iowa
« Reply #7: August 05, 2010, 06:58:07 PM »
Looking through available pictures of both...it's not even close.

Perhaps you are correct, but it would be more sporting of you to post comparables in the BWT.

I prefer to reserve comment pending my own evaluation.    :judge:

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: The "Real" Miss Iowa
« Reply #8: August 05, 2010, 07:20:28 PM »
I couldn't find comparable material on the Miss Iowa in question. While we have seen several decent photos of Miss WNFF I have not found any pictures that show the other's complete product.

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 33784
  • Hell yes!
Re: The "Real" Miss Iowa
« Reply #9: August 05, 2010, 09:36:02 PM »
I couldn't find comparable material on the Miss Iowa in question. While we have seen several decent photos of Miss WNFF I have not found any pictures that show the other's complete product.

 :?

Offline Potomac Cannons

  • Posts: 3279
Re: The "Real" Miss Iowa
« Reply #10: August 05, 2010, 09:37:09 PM »
I couldn't find comparable material on the Miss Iowa in question. While we have seen several decent photos of Miss WNFF I have not found any pictures that show the other's complete product.

I'll try to track them down later this evening.