I typed an extra 0. If I meant 1,000 I'd have added the comma.
And my "issue" is that we're all so desperate for a decent CF that we're talking about adding Michael Bourn.
What exactly is your definition of a decent CF'er if not Bourn?
This is my issue. I'm just curious what you don't find in Bourn. I mean I've listed reasons why he would be an obvious upgrade over anything we've had so I'm just trying to hear a counter argument.
