Pages: 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23   Go Down

Author Topic: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3  (Read 21070 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline natsfan4evr

  • Posts: 6171
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #350: July 31, 2011, 04:16:18 PM »
Did Bob just say that Werth went to 3rd unmolested?
Logged

Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23269
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #351: July 31, 2011, 04:16:38 PM »
Quote from: Kentucky_National on July 31, 2011, 04:15:49 PM
Did he just say unmolested?!?!

Thought I was hearing things.
Logged

Offline Kentucky_National

  • Posts: 4612
  • BANG ZOOM
    • My Twitter
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #352: July 31, 2011, 04:16:50 PM »
Quote from: natsfan4evr on July 31, 2011, 04:16:18 PM
Did Bob just say that Werth went to 3rd unmolested?

Yes. What the hell.
Logged

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #353: July 31, 2011, 04:16:53 PM »
Ah, what was that?
Logged

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #354: July 31, 2011, 04:17:09 PM »
D - R - E - W  !!!!!!
Logged

Offline houston-nat

  • Posts: 19050
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #355: July 31, 2011, 04:17:16 PM »
Y'all do realize that is an appropriate use of the word "unmolested".

Appropriate.......... but still kinda stupid.
Logged

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #356: July 31, 2011, 04:17:20 PM »
Quote from: Kentucky_National on July 31, 2011, 04:16:50 PM
Yes. What the hell.

Holy freak that's the third time now.
Logged

Offline natsfan4evr

  • Posts: 6171
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #357: July 31, 2011, 04:17:27 PM »
Quote from: ronnynat on July 31, 2011, 04:16:38 PM
Thought I was hearing things.
I guess I could confuse uncontested for unmolested...after about 5 drinks maybe
Logged

Offline chemist

  • Posts: 1099
  • Cheering All Zimmermen
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #358: July 31, 2011, 04:17:34 PM »
Storen!
Logged

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #359: July 31, 2011, 04:18:06 PM »
Carpenter uses the word "unmolested" all the time.
Logged

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #360: July 31, 2011, 04:18:35 PM »
Quote from: natsfan4evr on July 31, 2011, 04:17:27 PM
I guess I could confuse uncontested for unmolested...after about 5 drinks maybe

"Unmolested" just has a certain connotation to it.
Logged

Offline ernie0326

  • Posts: 2113
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #361: July 31, 2011, 04:18:36 PM »
Let's go Drew!!
Logged

Offline Kentucky_National

  • Posts: 4612
  • BANG ZOOM
    • My Twitter
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #362: July 31, 2011, 04:18:46 PM »
Hell yeah standing O for Drew.
Logged

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #363: July 31, 2011, 04:19:14 PM »
Carpenter: "...and look at the fans..." and the shot is of mostly empty seats.  :lol:
Logged

Offline houston-nat

  • Posts: 19050
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #364: July 31, 2011, 04:19:31 PM »
Again, unmolested is a perfectly legitimate word to use there. Just... you don't really want to use that word there.
Logged

Offline natsfan4evr

  • Posts: 6171
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #365: July 31, 2011, 04:20:01 PM »
If Drew was to blow this game, I wonder what the reaction will be
Logged

Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23269
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #366: July 31, 2011, 04:21:18 PM »
Quote from: natsfan4evr on July 31, 2011, 04:20:01 PM
If Drew was to blow this game, I wonder what the reaction will be

"Drewwwwww" would turn into "Booooooo"
Logged

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #367: July 31, 2011, 04:21:19 PM »
Quote from: houston-nat on July 31, 2011, 04:19:31 PM
Again, unmolested is a perfectly legitimate word to use there. Just... you don't really want to use that word there.

Not with this crowd.   ;)
Logged

Offline ernie0326

  • Posts: 2113
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #368: July 31, 2011, 04:21:37 PM »
Quote from: natsfan4evr on July 31, 2011, 04:20:01 PM
If Drew was to blow this game, I wonder what the reaction will be

They would still love him.  Be disappointed, but they'd still love him.
Logged

Offline natsfan4evr

  • Posts: 6171
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #369: July 31, 2011, 04:21:59 PM »
Quote from: houston-nat on July 31, 2011, 04:19:31 PM
Again, unmolested is a perfectly legitimate word to use there. Just... you don't really want to use that word there.
You are correct...just no sane person would use that to describe a runner making it to 3rd base. Unfairly or not, that word has a deep inappropriate sexual connotation associated with it.
Logged

Offline ernie0326

  • Posts: 2113
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #370: July 31, 2011, 04:22:48 PM »
One Down
Logged

Offline thepointe01

  • Posts: 4172
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #371: July 31, 2011, 04:22:50 PM »
1 down
Logged

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #372: July 31, 2011, 04:22:50 PM »
one down ...
Logged

Offline Kentucky_National

  • Posts: 4612
  • BANG ZOOM
    • My Twitter
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #373: July 31, 2011, 04:22:53 PM »
Beautiful. 2 more outs!
Logged

Offline natsfan4evr

  • Posts: 6171
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #374: July 31, 2011, 04:22:54 PM »
Quote from: ernie0326 on July 31, 2011, 04:21:37 PM
They would still love him.  Be disappointed, but they'd still love him.
You aren't new here, you should know better.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23   Go Up