Pages: 1 ... 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 [26] 27 28   Go Down

Author Topic: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1  (Read 22184 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Kevrock

  • Posts: 13788
  • That’s gonna be a no from me, doge.
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #625: May 25, 2009, 10:31:55 PM »
I'm a Nats fan. FML.
Logged

Offline natsfan4evr

  • Posts: 6171
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #626: May 25, 2009, 10:32:10 PM »
I'm still pissed about that HR call
Logged

Offline Minty Fresh

  • Posts: 20386
  • BOOM!
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #627: May 25, 2009, 10:32:15 PM »
Ugh. See y'all tomorrow unless my rainout gets rescheduled to tomorrow night.

I blame this loss on Joel Hanrahan!     :lol:
Logged

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #628: May 25, 2009, 10:32:18 PM »
While some of us get frustrated by Kearns' failures (among others) the freaking awesome guy seems to bask in them.  :?
Logged

Offline Kevrock

  • Posts: 13788
  • That’s gonna be a no from me, doge.
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #629: May 25, 2009, 10:32:22 PM »
Quote from: sportsfan882 on May 25, 2009, 10:31:17 PM
such a douchebag. can't wait until he acts like he won the WS when he gets the final out

LMAO. Hope you stuck around for the replay of him holding his hands to the sky. You called that one.
Logged

Offline PatsNats28

  • Posts: 8522
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #630: May 25, 2009, 10:32:27 PM »
Quote from: PC on May 25, 2009, 10:31:15 PM
8 million dollars for a "hitter" on a 5 for 44 run...  :|

i wouldn't call it a run, its more like a snail's paced walk.
Logged

Offline BerkeleyNat

  • Posts: 5026
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #631: May 25, 2009, 10:32:37 PM »
It's easy to act the way that K-Rod does when you don't ever have to bat.
Logged

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #632: May 25, 2009, 10:32:57 PM »
Quote from: natsfan4evr on May 25, 2009, 10:32:10 PM
I'm still pissed about that HR call
wouldn't have mattered because our offense failed miserably in the 7th-9th innings.

9 free passes and they only score 2 freaking runs
Logged

Offline Coladar

  • Posts: 2826
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #633: May 25, 2009, 10:35:26 PM »
There's no question we're going to get swept at this point... One can only hope that this horrific game (And as many LOB, it was horrid) is one of the last Acta and his bums will manage. Off-day Thursday might be the end of the line for him. If he's still here next Tuesday, we're stuck with him the entire season even if they lose 130 games. The offense clearly has gotten affected by the losing and all the talk of staying positive is the bullcrap it really is. Now that the offense is dying and the pitching is... better, but with the same pitchers that were horrible earlier, Acta's days have to be numbered. They just have to. For my sanity I hope so.
Logged

Offline BerkeleyNat

  • Posts: 5026
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #634: May 25, 2009, 10:35:27 PM »
The Mets "B" team easily beats our "A" team (if you can call it an A team)
Logged

Offline Air Zimmerman

  • Posts: 7179
  • best 3b in the business
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #635: May 25, 2009, 10:35:38 PM »
Quote from: BerkeleyNat on May 25, 2009, 10:29:35 PM
Kearns is trash, and should be kicked out the door along with Cabrera.

ya know what the funny thing is? KEARNS HAS SUCKED EVER SINCE HE PUT ON A NATIONALS UNIFORM BACK IN 2006. yet we still trot him out there. freaking infuriating!
Logged

Offline BerkeleyNat

  • Posts: 5026
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #636: May 25, 2009, 10:36:48 PM »
Quote from: Coladar on May 25, 2009, 10:35:26 PM
There's no question we're going to get swept at this point... One can only hope that this horrific game (And as many LOB, it was horrid) is one of the last Acta and his bums will manage. Off-day Thursday might be the end of the line for him. If he's still here next Tuesday, we're stuck with him the entire season even if they lose 130 games. The offense clearly has gotten affected by the losing and all the talk of staying positive is the bullcrap it really is. Now that the offense is dying and the pitching is... better, but with the same pitchers that were horrible earlier, Acta's days have to be numbered. They just have to. For my sanity I hope so.

I think we're stuck with him until the end of the season. Our outstanding ownership will see to that.
Logged

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #637: May 25, 2009, 10:37:02 PM »
The bullpen finished unscored against.  And still we lose.

Thanks offense.
Logged

Offline Ali the Baseball Cat

  • Posts: 17666
  • babble on
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #638: May 25, 2009, 10:37:25 PM »
He and Dunn better start comin' back with some fish...
Quote from: SoxNats08 on May 25, 2009, 10:32:27 PM
i wouldn't call it a run, its more like a snail's paced walk.
Logged

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #639: May 25, 2009, 10:37:37 PM »
Quote from: Coladar on May 25, 2009, 10:35:26 PM
There's no question we're going to get swept at this point... One can only hope that this horrific game (And as many LOB, it was horrid) is one of the last Acta and his bums will manage. Off-day Thursday might be the end of the line for him. If he's still here next Tuesday, we're stuck with him the entire season even if they lose 130 games. The offense clearly has gotten affected by the losing and all the talk of staying positive is the bullcrap it really is. Now that the offense is dying and the pitching is... better, but with the same pitchers that were horrible earlier, Acta's days have to be numbered. They just have to. For my sanity I hope so.
and people laughed at me when I suggested the same thing a few days ago. Like you said "the offense clearly has gotten affected by the losing and all the talk of stay positive is bullcrap".

Acta isn't going anywhere I'm afraid. The games against Santana and Hamels are automatic losses. We have a slim chance against Livo tomorrow but with Stammen on the mound who knows what is going to happen.
Logged

Offline Air Zimmerman

  • Posts: 7179
  • best 3b in the business
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #640: May 25, 2009, 10:37:42 PM »
Quote from: BerkeleyNat on May 25, 2009, 10:35:27 PM
The Mets "B" team easily beats our "A" team (if you can call it an A team)

this isn't our A team. Dukes and Flores are our A team. put Dukes and Flores in the lineup tonight, and we win the ball game.
Logged

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #641: May 25, 2009, 10:38:47 PM »
Quote from: Air Zimmerman on May 25, 2009, 10:35:38 PM
ya know what the funny thing is? KEARNS HAS SUCKED EVER SINCE HE PUT ON A NATIONALS UNIFORM BACK IN 2006. yet we still trot him out there. freaking infuriating!
He is one of Acta's "boys" even though he's not Dominican.

Truthfully though, Willingham isn't a whole lot better.
Logged

Offline JMW IV

  • Posts: 11345
  • Name on the Front > Name on The Back
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #642: May 25, 2009, 10:41:08 PM »
did Kearns' biggest fanboy happen to make an appearance in this thread recently?
Logged

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 35131
  • World Champions!!!
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #643: May 25, 2009, 10:41:27 PM »
Quote from: sportsfan882 on May 25, 2009, 10:38:47 PM
He is one of Acta's "boys" even though he's not Dominican.

Truthfully though, Willingham isn't a whole lot better.

You should probably look up your precious stats.

Wrong as usual.
Logged

Offline BerkeleyNat

  • Posts: 5026
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #644: May 25, 2009, 10:41:42 PM »
Quote from: JMadIV on May 25, 2009, 10:41:08 PM
did Kearns' biggest fanboy happen to make an appearance in this thread recently?

eagleskins? He didn't show up tonite.
Logged

Offline EdStroud

  • Posts: 10139
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #645: May 25, 2009, 10:44:07 PM »
It isn't much fun losing to the split-squad Mets.
heck lets take it out on Livan tomorrow night
Logged

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #646: May 25, 2009, 10:44:34 PM »
Quote from: Lintyfresh85 on May 25, 2009, 10:41:27 PM
You should probably look up your precious stats.

Wrong as usual.
Willingham has a few more bombs but their numbers are eerily similar.

Kearns: .213 BA with 27 Ks in 108 ABs
Willingham: .215 BA with 22 Ks in 93 ABs
Logged

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 35131
  • World Champions!!!
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #647: May 25, 2009, 10:47:17 PM »
Quote from: sportsfan882 on May 25, 2009, 10:44:34 PM
Willingham has a few more bombs but their numbers are eerily similar.

Kearns: .213 BA with 27 Ks in 108 ABs
Willingham: .215 BA with 22 Ks in 93 ABs

Really? I'm pretty sure Willingham's OPS trumps Kearns by a good 60 points. It's not really even close.

Hell, Willingham has an even better OPS than Dukes.
Logged

Offline Ali the Baseball Cat

  • Posts: 17666
  • babble on
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #648: May 25, 2009, 10:48:17 PM »
Both suck. 

Quote from: sportsfan882 on May 25, 2009, 10:44:34 PM
Willingham has a few more bombs but their numbers are eerily similar.

Kearns: .213 BA with 27 Ks in 108 ABs
Willingham: .215 BA with 22 Ks in 93 ABs
Logged

Offline Air Zimmerman

  • Posts: 7179
  • best 3b in the business
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #649: May 25, 2009, 10:55:58 PM »
random question: are we REALLY going to put Olsen back in the rotation when he returns?! please say no.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 [26] 27 28   Go Up