Author Topic: Nationals vs Cardinals, Game 3  (Read 15443 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23269
Re: Nationals vs Cardinals, Game 3
« Reply #150: June 05, 2008, 09:01:23 PM »
fixed.

LOL. You're "fixed" freak, huh? :lol:


Edit: That sounds kind of weird.

Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23269
Re: Nationals vs Cardinals, Game 3
« Reply #151: June 05, 2008, 09:02:33 PM »
But it's the NBA.  Nobody cares.

Shoot. I do. I like all sports. Even water polo has its moments. :lol:

Offline eagleskins

  • BANNED FOREVER
  • Posts: 2946
Re: Nationals vs Cardinals, Game 3
« Reply #152: June 05, 2008, 09:03:27 PM »
Casto looks like the real deal.  Out right cut Wily No, Fat Johnny, and Paulie Walnuts. 

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals vs Cardinals, Game 3
« Reply #153: June 05, 2008, 09:04:13 PM »
LOL. You're "fixed" freak, huh? :lol:

We could use this as the image for fixed :lol:


Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23269
Re: Nationals vs Cardinals, Game 3
« Reply #154: June 05, 2008, 09:04:36 PM »
Casto looks like the real deal.  Out right cut Wily No, Fat Johnny, and Paulie Walnuts. 

If it were that easy, I'm sure they would.

Offline PatsNats28

  • Posts: 8522
Re: Nationals vs Cardinals, Game 3
« Reply #155: June 05, 2008, 09:04:47 PM »
why are they intentionally walking him?

Offline eagleskins

  • BANNED FOREVER
  • Posts: 2946
Re: Nationals vs Cardinals, Game 3
« Reply #156: June 05, 2008, 09:05:07 PM »
Walking Langerhans to get to Nieves?

Offline PatsNats28

  • Posts: 8522
Re: Nationals vs Cardinals, Game 3
« Reply #157: June 05, 2008, 09:05:11 PM »
why are they intentionally walking him?

is this his first career intentional walk without the pitcher on deck?

Offline Obed_Marsh

  • Posts: 7593
Re: Nationals vs Cardinals, Game 3
« Reply #158: June 05, 2008, 09:05:29 PM »
LOL. Walking Langerhans to get to Nieves. They're listing reasons why on the radio but cannot shake the feeling this is going to come back to bite them.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals vs Cardinals, Game 3
« Reply #159: June 05, 2008, 09:05:34 PM »
LOL. You're "fixed" freak, huh? :lol:


Edit: That sounds kind of weird.

Yeah it almost sounds criminal :?

MrMadison

  • Guest
Re: Nationals vs Cardinals, Game 3
« Reply #160: June 05, 2008, 09:06:01 PM »
why are they intentionally walking him?

force at any base for hopeful double play. La Russa is hoping Nieves hits a ground ball.

that's the only feasible reason.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals vs Cardinals, Game 3
« Reply #161: June 05, 2008, 09:06:19 PM »
why are they intentionally walking him?

Nieves is a DP candidate.

Offline Minty Fresh

  • Posts: 20386
  • BOOM!
Re: Nationals vs Cardinals, Game 3
« Reply #162: June 05, 2008, 09:06:43 PM »
I don't see how Rauch gets the nod over Guzman, with the season Guzman is having.

but I could be convinced.

I know it's a really small sample size right now, but I should think if Flores keeps cranking out the doubles and RBIs he should be heavily considered.

Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23269
Re: Nationals vs Cardinals, Game 3
« Reply #163: June 05, 2008, 09:06:49 PM »
We could use this as the image for fixed :lol:

(Image removed from quote.)

:rofl: That'd confuse anyone who didn't read your post. Now it must be done. :lol:

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals vs Cardinals, Game 3
« Reply #164: June 05, 2008, 09:06:56 PM »
That blows.

Offline PatsNats28

  • Posts: 8522
Re: Nationals vs Cardinals, Game 3
« Reply #165: June 05, 2008, 09:07:24 PM »
 :?

MrMadison

  • Guest
Re: Nationals vs Cardinals, Game 3
« Reply #166: June 05, 2008, 09:07:43 PM »
come on wee-willie. little single here, nothing more.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals vs Cardinals, Game 3
« Reply #167: June 05, 2008, 09:07:43 PM »
I know it's a really small sample size right now, but I should think if Flores keeps cranking out the doubles and RBIs he should be heavily considered.

Like you said, he probably hasn't had enough playing time for that to happen.

Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23269
Re: Nationals vs Cardinals, Game 3
« Reply #168: June 05, 2008, 09:08:06 PM »
I know it's a really small sample size right now, but I should think if Flores keeps cranking out the doubles and RBIs he should be heavily considered.

I know you're catcher-biased, but I agree. :lol:

MrMadison

  • Guest
Re: Nationals vs Cardinals, Game 3
« Reply #169: June 05, 2008, 09:08:18 PM »
this pitcher has a ridiculously odd delivery.

Offline Minty Fresh

  • Posts: 20386
  • BOOM!
Re: Nationals vs Cardinals, Game 3
« Reply #170: June 05, 2008, 09:08:50 PM »
It speaks volumes when your team sends up Willie Harris to pinch hit.

Offline PatsNats28

  • Posts: 8522
Re: Nationals vs Cardinals, Game 3
« Reply #171: June 05, 2008, 09:09:03 PM »
Like you said, he probably hasn't had enough playing time for that to happen.

ya hes only played 23 games

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals vs Cardinals, Game 3
« Reply #172: June 05, 2008, 09:09:27 PM »
We have 8 runs and the offense is still pathetic :?

Offline Minty Fresh

  • Posts: 20386
  • BOOM!
Re: Nationals vs Cardinals, Game 3
« Reply #173: June 05, 2008, 09:10:00 PM »
Our bench SUCKS.

Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23269
Re: Nationals vs Cardinals, Game 3
« Reply #174: June 05, 2008, 09:10:01 PM »
2x we've left the bases loaded now. I know it's being kind of picky after we've scored 8 this game, but come on! They owe us.