Poll

Haren: Conundrum or Travesty?

Conundrum ("a difficult and confusing question or problem")
28 (45.9%)
Travesty ("a false, absurd, or distorted representation of something," in this case, a starting pitcher)
33 (54.1%)

Total Members Voted: 60

Author Topic: The Dan Haren Conundrum (or Travesty?)  (Read 26230 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 63558
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: The Dan Haren Conundrum
« Reply #175: June 06, 2013, 08:46:07 AM »
That's what happens when a guy who never has gotten a big deal before, gets a big deal. He doesn't have to prove himself every start to the team. I believe that if we brought him back on a 1 year deal with an option he'd be as good for us as he was last year.
Why would he take a 1 year deal when Chicago offered him three? I also think you're forgetting how mundane he was the second half of last year.

Offline Ray D

  • Posts: 10073
Re: The Dan Haren Conundrum
« Reply #176: June 06, 2013, 09:14:18 AM »
Why would he take a 1 year deal when Chicago offered him three? I also think you're forgetting how mundane he was the second half of last year.
I think he meant if we had tendered him an offer.   If we had done so he would have lost value, would not have gotten a three-year offer, and would have signed a one-year deal here.

Offline Ray D

  • Posts: 10073
Re: The Dan Haren Conundrum
« Reply #177: June 06, 2013, 09:15:24 AM »
I also think you're forgetting how mundane he was the second half of last year.

No.  But one half is better than no halves.

Online aspenbubba

  • Posts: 5712
Re: The Dan Haren Conundrum
« Reply #178: June 06, 2013, 09:22:44 AM »
Mindfacting here but Jackson is averaging 5 and a third innings per start this year. Haren is averaging 5 and two-thirds.

Jackson's ERA is also over 6 and he's walking over 3 batter per 9 innings.

I am comparing last years EJax to this years Haren

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 63558
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: The Dan Haren Conundrum
« Reply #179: June 06, 2013, 09:27:45 AM »
I am comparing last years EJax to this years Haren

How about comparing this year's EJax to this year's Haren?

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21648
Re: The Dan Haren Conundrum
« Reply #180: June 06, 2013, 09:38:05 AM »
it's not like he gets enough run support for his atrociousness to actually matter

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 63558
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: The Dan Haren Conundrum
« Reply #181: June 06, 2013, 09:46:59 AM »
it's not like he gets enough run support for his atrociousness to actually matter
Right. If he had only given up three runs last night, he still would have lost.

Offline madj55

  • Posts: 7759
Re: The Dan Haren Conundrum
« Reply #182: June 06, 2013, 09:51:04 AM »
I think he meant if we had tendered him an offer.   If we had done so he would have lost value, would not have gotten a three-year offer, and would have signed a one-year deal here.
Precisely.

How about comparing this year's EJax to this year's Haren?
This comparison doesn't hold much weight to me since EJax isn't with us. Just like with Morse, I only care about how he fit in and performed for our team. Jackson had strikeout stuff and extra velocity where if he made a mistake he could still get it past hitters. Haren can't do that, even against teams that don't hit a lot of homers like the Mets. And aside from two bad starts in which he gave up 8 earned against the Rockies and Cardinals, Jackson was actually very solid for us as a #4 guy.

Offline More of #34

  • Posts: 901
Re: The Dan Haren Conundrum
« Reply #183: June 06, 2013, 10:20:02 AM »
Haren adds another problem to the myriad ones we have this year.

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: The Dan Haren Conundrum
« Reply #184: June 06, 2013, 10:21:36 AM »
His last two games he was great the first two times through the lineup.  Maybe he's just a middle relief type pitcher now?  Innings eater out of the bullpen?  Better for the bullpen than H-Rod?

:shrug:

I don't have the answer but that sure would be an expensive bullpen with Haren and Soriano.

Offline Ali the Baseball Cat

  • Posts: 17694
  • babble on
Re: The Dan Haren Conundrum
« Reply #185: June 06, 2013, 11:57:33 AM »
I just about fell off my chair when I saw that Haren is getting 13 large this year.

I don't have the answer but that sure would be an expensive bullpen with Haren and Soriano.

Offline MorseTheHorse

  • Posts: 3172
Re: The Dan Haren Conundrum
« Reply #186: June 11, 2013, 08:17:38 AM »
Boz does not like Haren:  http://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/nationals/washington-nationals-havent-met-expectations-so-what-now/2013/06/10/085a7a18-d218-11e2-8cbe-1bcbee06f8f8_story.html

Frankly, I don't get the hate, at least to the severe levels Boz lets loose.  Hope Haren puts up a good game tonight. 

Online aspenbubba

  • Posts: 5712
Re: The Dan Haren Conundrum
« Reply #187: June 11, 2013, 08:20:15 AM »
Boz does not like Haren:  http://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/nationals/washington-nationals-havent-met-expectations-so-what-now/2013/06/10/085a7a18-d218-11e2-8cbe-1bcbee06f8f8_story.html

Frankly, I don't get the hate, at least to the severe levels Boz lets loose.  Hope Haren puts up a good game tonight. 

At Coors Field? When pigs fly.

Offline MorseTheHorse

  • Posts: 3172
Re: The Dan Haren Conundrum
« Reply #188: June 11, 2013, 08:24:52 AM »
At Coors Field? When pigs fly.
Heh, forgot about that.  I can still hope he does well tho!

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 63558
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: The Dan Haren Conundrum
« Reply #189: June 11, 2013, 08:45:25 AM »
Over/under for runs given up by Haren tonight: 6

Offline TigerFan

  • Posts: 3890
  • A split allegiance is still an allegiance
Re: The Dan Haren Conundrum
« Reply #190: June 11, 2013, 08:48:55 AM »
Boz does not like Haren:  http://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/nationals/washington-nationals-havent-met-expectations-so-what-now/2013/06/10/085a7a18-d218-11e2-8cbe-1bcbee06f8f8_story.html

Frankly, I don't get the hate, at least to the severe levels Boz lets loose.  Hope Haren puts up a good game tonight.

I get where the hate is coming from. Haren is arguably putting up his worst MLB season.  This coming after signing a fat contract.  It could be a mindfact but it seems in many sports after signing a large deal, be it one year or long term, players take their foot off the gas pedal.  I'd assume it is comforting knowing they are financially set and don't need to bear down as much knowing even a bad season they are ok. 

Haren is different in so much as it was just a one year deal and a really poor year hurts his 2014 status with any team.   

Offline madj55

  • Posts: 7759
Re: The Dan Haren Conundrum
« Reply #191: June 11, 2013, 08:51:09 AM »
Carlos Gonzalez might hit one 500 feet off Haren tonight

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: The Dan Haren Conundrum
« Reply #192: June 11, 2013, 09:01:26 AM »
Cargo and Tulo have been unbelievable this year. Tonight's game is going to be a crapshow.

Is Ohlendorf still starting tomorrow too? :spaz:

Offline Minty Fresh

  • Posts: 20386
  • BOOM!
Re: The Dan Haren Conundrum
« Reply #193: June 11, 2013, 10:04:21 AM »
Cargo and Tulo have been unbelievable this year. Tonight's game is going to be a crapshow.

Is Ohlendorf still starting tomorrow too? :spaz:

+1

The positivity of the Twins DH is coming to an end....

Offline CurlyW4lyfe

  • Posts: 467
Re: The Dan Haren Conundrum
« Reply #194: June 11, 2013, 10:09:39 AM »
I thought Detwiler was coming back this week.

Offline Displaced Bucco

  • Posts: 1602
  • Atlanta delenda est - Davey the Elder & WT Sherman
Re: The Dan Haren Conundrum
« Reply #195: June 11, 2013, 10:21:08 AM »
Over/under for home runs given up by Haren tonight: 6

FIFY

Online machpost

  • Posts: 658
Re: The Dan Haren Conundrum
« Reply #196: June 11, 2013, 11:36:02 AM »
Haren's not great. But I wonder how his stats compare to all the other #5 starters out there.

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21648
Re: The Dan Haren Conundrum
« Reply #197: June 11, 2013, 11:55:32 AM »
Haren's not great. But I wonder how his stats compare to all the other #5 starters out there.

his fip this year is 173rd among starters (era is about the same). If you make it a minimum of 30 IP (i.e. eliminating the spot starters and the one or two game injury replacements), he jumps to to 130, but only out of 152 qualifiers. So he's one of the worst starters in the league pretty much anyway you look at it. As far as compared to number five starters, if you multiple 30 teams by 4, that's 120, so ideally, the number 121 starter is the best number five in the league and the number 150 is the worst, so it's safe to assume that compared to other number 5s, he still sucks

Offline nobleisthyname

  • Posts: 2909
Re: The Dan Haren Conundrum
« Reply #198: June 11, 2013, 12:53:02 PM »
His xFIP is 4.18, his SIERA is 3.97. Those are pretty solid for a #5 starter. His problem has been the long ball. Unfortunately Coors Field isn't the best place to try and change that  :?

I'm hopeful he pitches like he did against the Orioles/Phillies/Braves/Dodgers (all his good starts in May) but I'd be lying if I said I wasn't apprehensive for tonight's game.

Offline TigerFan

  • Posts: 3890
  • A split allegiance is still an allegiance
Re: The Dan Haren Conundrum
« Reply #199: June 11, 2013, 01:38:22 PM »
Also what no one has mentioned recently at least is he is being paid $13M.  I can't imagine there are two other #5's if that being paid that kind of money.