Author Topic: Nationals @ Braves, Game 2  (Read 8029 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 2
« Reply #125: August 31, 2011, 08:56:46 PM »
So, we're trading Morse but keeping Werth?

Offline welch

  • Posts: 16408
  • The Sweetest Right Handed Swing in 1950s Baseball
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 2
« Reply #126: August 31, 2011, 08:58:15 PM »
So, we're trading Morse but keeping Werth?

I'm putting Morse back at 1B and trading Marrero for...who?

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 2
« Reply #127: August 31, 2011, 08:58:38 PM »
Johnson is going to make Lannan lose his quality start.  I guess that's good for arbitration.

Offline MorseTheHorse

  • Posts: 3170
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 2
« Reply #128: August 31, 2011, 08:59:25 PM »
I'm putting Morse back at 1B and trading Marrero for...who?

a bag of chips.  Who cares??? Just don't trade Morse

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 2
« Reply #129: August 31, 2011, 09:01:36 PM »
Johnson is going to make Lannan lose his quality start.  I guess that's good for arbitration.

Take that Davey and Rizzo!

Offline TylerDC

  • Posts: 5962
  • The Future.
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 2
« Reply #130: August 31, 2011, 09:01:46 PM »
I really like how Lannan recovered.

Offline Kevrock

  • Posts: 13788
  • That’s gonna be a no from me, doge.
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 2
« Reply #131: August 31, 2011, 09:02:29 PM »
a bag of chips.  Who cares??? Just don't trade Morse

Well, I care. Marrero could have some great value on the trading block.

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 63306
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 2
« Reply #132: August 31, 2011, 09:03:55 PM »
FP and Bob are not attractive men. Just saw them in HD

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 63306
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 2
« Reply #133: August 31, 2011, 09:06:55 PM »
God Desmond, he throws two fastballs in the dirt so you swung at the third?

Good at Ian to swing at balls 5 & 6

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 2
« Reply #134: August 31, 2011, 09:07:17 PM »
FP and Bob are not attractive men. Just saw them in HD

:shock:

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 63306
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 2
« Reply #135: August 31, 2011, 09:09:38 PM »
:shock:

Yea first time I actually saw them on a HD screen. Debbi isn't bad though

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 2
« Reply #136: August 31, 2011, 09:10:16 PM »
Yea first time I actually saw them on a HD screen. Debbi isn't bad though

The second part of this post totally discredits your judgment.  :lol:

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 2
« Reply #137: August 31, 2011, 09:10:23 PM »
Jake Westbrook just hit a grand slam against Randy Wolf so Lannan looks a little better now.

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 63306
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 2
« Reply #138: August 31, 2011, 09:11:59 PM »
The second part of this post totally discredits your judgment.  :lol:

Harsh. Just don't let her talk and its all good.

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 63306
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 2
« Reply #139: August 31, 2011, 09:13:01 PM »
HRod's change acts almost like a splitter. He needs to throw it a lot more.

Offline Kentucky_National

  • Posts: 4612
  • BANG ZOOM
    • My Twitter
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 2
« Reply #140: August 31, 2011, 09:13:04 PM »
Looks like all our offense for this series was used last night.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 2
« Reply #141: August 31, 2011, 09:13:34 PM »
Harsh. Just don't let her talk and its all good.

Debbi Taylor: "Slateman, are you feeding off of this?"

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 33783
  • Hell yes!
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 2
« Reply #142: August 31, 2011, 09:13:51 PM »
The second part of this post totally discredits your judgment.  :lol:

I think she had her high beams on.  That's enough to boost any assessment.

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 63306
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 2
« Reply #143: August 31, 2011, 09:15:05 PM »
Lol,  like I said, a little duct tape and its all good.

Good HRod is good

Offline TylerDC

  • Posts: 5962
  • The Future.
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 2
« Reply #144: August 31, 2011, 09:15:05 PM »
Oh my 101 good Hrod!

Offline TylerDC

  • Posts: 5962
  • The Future.
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 2
« Reply #145: August 31, 2011, 09:15:30 PM »
HoF HRod is HoF.

Offline blue911

  • Posts: 18487
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 2
« Reply #146: August 31, 2011, 09:16:27 PM »
I think she had her high beams on.  That's enough to boost any assessment.

Ugh, that's like checking out Mother Teresa

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 2
« Reply #147: August 31, 2011, 09:17:26 PM »
Do we put up a fight here or do we die quietly and without a struggle?  :?


Offline Frau Mau

  • Posts: 1121
  • Good boy!
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 2
« Reply #148: August 31, 2011, 09:18:29 PM »
FP and Bob are not attractive men. Just saw them in HD

Why are you checking them out, dude?


Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 2
« Reply #149: August 31, 2011, 09:18:43 PM »
Do we put up a fight here or do we die quietly and without a struggle?  :?

(Image removed from quote.)

Venter's inning was 9 pitches.  I say we go down in 5 pitches in the 9th.