Author Topic: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)  (Read 96612 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1200: October 28, 2012, 02:39:00 PM »
Camouflage

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 63095
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1201: October 28, 2012, 02:55:32 PM »
They're dressing up as bumble bees for Halloween

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1202: October 28, 2012, 02:56:23 PM »
They're dressing up as bumble bees for Halloween

 :lmao:

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21606
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1203: October 28, 2012, 02:58:11 PM »
Is one stop too much to ask for?  I've come around on Shanny,  but Haslett blows,  and Shanny needs to loose his player personnel control on the defensive side

Offline Ali the Baseball Cat

  • Posts: 17647
  • babble on
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1204: October 28, 2012, 03:02:48 PM »
WTF is with the bee suits  :rofl:

Offline Ali the Baseball Cat

  • Posts: 17647
  • babble on
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1205: October 28, 2012, 03:03:16 PM »
Beat me to it.  Ridonkulous.
They're dressing up as bumble bees for Halloween


Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1206: October 28, 2012, 03:03:57 PM »
Beat me to it.  Ridonkulous.


27-9   Aye laddie, ridonkulous.

Offline GburgNatsFan

  • Posts: 22277
  • Let's drink a few for Mathguy.
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1207: October 28, 2012, 03:06:09 PM »
Not that it would matter, but has Cooley been thrown a pass? Just curious.

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1208: October 28, 2012, 03:06:25 PM »
Not that it would matter, but has Cooley been thrown a pass? Just curious.


one

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 63095
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1209: October 28, 2012, 03:11:48 PM »
Oh,  with 2 minutes left in the third, the team  decides to start playing for real

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 63095
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1210: October 28, 2012, 03:12:05 PM »
Not that it would matter, but has Cooley been thrown a pass? Just curious.


One. And Griffin put it on the wrong shoulder.

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1211: October 28, 2012, 03:13:33 PM »
Oh,  with 2 minutes left in the third, the team  decides to start playing for real

This is what is trying about 'skins' fans.   Did occur to you that they are playing for real and losing?

Offline GburgNatsFan

  • Posts: 22277
  • Let's drink a few for Mathguy.
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1212: October 28, 2012, 03:21:14 PM »
Must have missed it when I was outside trying to get the damn genny to start. Figured I'd get the pain overwith early. Of course, that doesn't mean it will start Monday night...
one


Offline GburgNatsFan

  • Posts: 22277
  • Let's drink a few for Mathguy.
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1213: October 28, 2012, 03:22:12 PM »
It's what's trying about all fans.

This is what is trying about 'skins' fans.   Did occur to you that they are playing for real and losing?


Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1214: October 28, 2012, 03:23:14 PM »
It's what's trying about all fans.



I know but I'm on the other side.   LOL   I like RGIII, Kerrigan, Fletcher, etc. but they're not quite there yet.

Offline GburgNatsFan

  • Posts: 22277
  • Let's drink a few for Mathguy.
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1215: October 28, 2012, 03:23:58 PM »
In a Washington thread. ;)
I know but I'm on the other side.   LOL


Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1216: October 28, 2012, 03:24:38 PM »
In a Washington thread. ;)


I'm bein' humble out of respect.

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1217: October 28, 2012, 03:25:42 PM »
Wow, Lions came back.

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 63095
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1218: October 28, 2012, 03:33:29 PM »
Apparently, the Redskins don't feel like catching the ball

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1219: October 28, 2012, 03:33:41 PM »
'skins ain't on the same skill level as RGIII.   He is real.

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1220: October 28, 2012, 03:45:44 PM »
Hall's another VT punk.   DFA him.

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 63095
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1221: October 28, 2012, 03:46:08 PM »
And DeAngello Hall has lost his mind

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 35130
  • World Champions!!!
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1222: October 28, 2012, 03:54:24 PM »
Hall's another VT punk.   DFA him.

:clap:

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1223: October 28, 2012, 03:59:52 PM »
'skins ain't on the same skill level as RGIII.   He is real.

I've never followed a team with a QB anywhere near as skilled, and I used to watch Roethlisberger play when I lived in PA :poke:

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1224: October 28, 2012, 04:01:18 PM »
Not that it would matter, but has Cooley been thrown a pass? Just curious.




Not that it matters, but yes