Author Topic: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1  (Read 40256 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline 2k6nats

  • Posts: 9421
  • Through Fick and Zim
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #225: September 24, 2007, 10:32:00 PM »
Wow, the Mets outhit the Nats.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #226: September 24, 2007, 10:32:50 PM »
look at that, you guys peeing you're pants and Jesus gives up 1 meaningless run.

I think everyone was being sarcastic

oakviewnatfan

  • Guest
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #227: September 24, 2007, 10:33:04 PM »
Good thing we are up by 10.. Please don't bring back Colome next season
Are you serious?  The guy before his infected buttocks was lights out and has pitched well in his last three outing.  He was a great find for the bullpen and has great arm like Schroder.

Offline Air Zimmerman

  • Posts: 7179
  • best 3b in the business
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #228: September 24, 2007, 10:33:48 PM »
I want a sweep, and nothing less will suffice. We got off to great start, tomorrow will be a tough one. We need Berg to be have his stuff clicking.



Offline Air Zimmerman

  • Posts: 7179
  • best 3b in the business
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #229: September 24, 2007, 10:34:28 PM »
Are you serious?  The guy before his infected buttocks was lights out and has pitched well in his last three outing.  He was a great find for the bullpen and has great arm like Schroder.

thank you for co-signing what I've been saying.

Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #230: September 24, 2007, 10:34:46 PM »
70 wins.  Eat that Buster Olney and the Psychic Network!

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #231: September 24, 2007, 10:36:54 PM »
70 wins.  Eat that Buster Olney and the Psychic Network!

Olney has to be pissed off at the Nats for proving him wrong. It would be huge to get to 73 curly W's and avoid 90 losses.

Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23269
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #232: September 24, 2007, 10:37:40 PM »
Are you serious?  The guy before his infected buttocks was lights out and has pitched well in his last three outing.  He was a great find for the bullpen and has great arm like Schroder.

I don't know what else you said, but man, that had me cracking up.

Offline Air Zimmerman

  • Posts: 7179
  • best 3b in the business
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #233: September 24, 2007, 10:39:55 PM »
O ya, i forgot to mention how much Pelfrey p's me off. He's ridiculous with that stupid retainer or whatever he chews on. He's what i like to call a goober.

Offline kimnat

  • Posts: 7172
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #234: September 24, 2007, 10:41:10 PM »
Bergmann will be starting on his BIRTHDAY tommorrow.

(Image removed from quote.)

I'm glad you caught that.  I thought about mentioning it, but didn't want to appear "thunderlike".

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #235: September 24, 2007, 10:42:39 PM »
I'm glad you caught that.  I thought about mentioning it, but didn't want to appear "thunderlike".


Too late for that kimnat :lol:

Offline kimnat

  • Posts: 7172
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #236: September 24, 2007, 10:43:26 PM »
LOL!!!!!  But at least I'm not blindly OBSESSED!

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #237: September 24, 2007, 10:43:34 PM »
O ya, i forgot to mention how much Pelfrey p's me off. He's ridiculous with that stupid retainer or whatever he chews on. He's what i like to call a goober.

As opposed to being a pimp or a gansta :rofl:

Offline nats2playoffs

  • Posts: 23843
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #238: September 24, 2007, 10:44:37 PM »
look at that, you guys peeing you're pants and Jesus gives up 1 meaningless run.

Maybe it wasn't pee.
After all:
...Langerhans up and he jacks one. He's good for a jack once every now and then.

A 13-4 win probably qualifies as a wet dream for most Nationals fans. 
Well, at least the guys...

Offline 2k6nats

  • Posts: 9421
  • Through Fick and Zim
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #239: September 24, 2007, 10:44:40 PM »
As opposed to being a pimp or a gansta :rofl:

Plus, if he wears braces, it's hard for him to chew BAZOOKA BUBBLE GUM!!!

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #240: September 24, 2007, 10:44:58 PM »
LOL!!!!!

The fact that you alluded to it shows that you feel a severe case of thunderitis. :lol:

Offline kimnat

  • Posts: 7172
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #241: September 24, 2007, 10:45:42 PM »
The case ain't coming on.  I just don't want to catch it!!!

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #242: September 24, 2007, 10:47:59 PM »
The case ain't coming on.  I just don't want to catch it!!!

I'll try not to rip Bergmann about tossing beachballs when you're around so you won't pounce on me like a den mother and demand documentation (this last demand would be more appropriate coming from nospin :lol:).

Offline nats2playoffs

  • Posts: 23843
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #243: September 24, 2007, 10:48:47 PM »
I'm glad you caught that.  I thought about mentioning it, but didn't want to appear "thunderlike".

"Thunderlike" is when Bergmann opens the trunk of his car...
and YOU are in it, asking for an autograph.


Offline kimnat

  • Posts: 7172
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #244: September 24, 2007, 10:49:17 PM »
all joking aside - FOR A MOMENT- though spidey.  I really hope you all know that even though I know him a little and think (as my sig says) that he IS a really nice guy, I can still recognize and admit a not so great outting, etc.  I WANT him to do well, but I hope I don't look like a complete subjective nutcase.  That's why I wanted the stats laid out for me the other night.  That way I was able to really look at the two of them side by side and see how they look compared to the other.  Does that make sense?

Offline kimnat

  • Posts: 7172
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #245: September 24, 2007, 10:49:48 PM »
"Thunderlike" is when Bergmann opens the trunk of his car...
and YOU are in it, asking for an autograph.
(Image removed from quote.)


LOLOL!  Thanks N2P!

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #246: September 24, 2007, 10:49:52 PM »
"Thunderlike" is when Bergmann opens the trunk of his car...
and YOU are in it, asking for an autograph.
(Image removed from quote.)


:rofl:

Offline kimnat

  • Posts: 7172
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #247: September 24, 2007, 10:50:31 PM »
I'll try not to rip Bergmann about tossing beachballs when you're around so you won't pounce on me like a den mother and demand documentation (this last demand would be more appropriate coming from nospin :lol:).

cross my heart!  I won't pounce you!

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #248: September 24, 2007, 10:52:50 PM »
I'll try not to rip Bergmann about tossing beachballs when you're around so you won't pounce on me like a den mother and demand documentation (this last demand would be more appropriate coming from nospin :lol:).
Bergmann has been very solid lately.  Jason is 4-0 in his last 10 starts which is quite remarkable. 

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #249: September 24, 2007, 10:52:52 PM »
all joking aside - FOR A MOMENT- though spidey.  I really hope you all know that even though I know him a little and think (as my sig says) that he IS a really nice guy, I can still recognize and admit a not so great outting, etc.  I WANT him to do well, but I hope I don't look like a complete subjective nutcase.  That's why I wanted the stats laid out for me the other night.  That way I was able to really look at the two of them side by side and see how they look compared to the other.  Does that make sense?

Yeah it makes sense but the female in you can't help but render you nothing more than a subjective nutcase :lol:

I know you said all joking aside but I couldn't resist. I know I joke way too much all the time but sometimes I just can't help myself.