Author Topic: 2012/13 Offseason Discussion Thread  (Read 176002 times)

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline houston-nat

  • Posts: 19050
Re: 2012/13 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #1100: November 02, 2012, 07:54:37 PM »
Seriously? We really must not have wanted Haren. Marmol is subtraction by addition.

Offline Mattionals

  • Posts: 5752
Re: 2012/13 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #1101: November 02, 2012, 07:55:48 PM »
Seriously? We really must not have wanted Haren. Marmol is subtraction by addition.

Can't he throw like a 93 MPH unhittable slider?

At the bat boy in the dugout?

Offline zimm_da_kid

  • Posts: 7948
  • The one true ace
Re: 2012/13 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #1102: November 02, 2012, 07:55:59 PM »
why would the cubs want him?  They are not going to be anywhere close to good this year. 

Offline houston-nat

  • Posts: 19050
Re: 2012/13 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #1103: November 02, 2012, 08:10:15 PM »
why would the cubs want him?  They are not going to be anywhere close to good this year. 

July trade bait.

Offline TylerDC

  • Posts: 5962
  • The Future.
Re: 2012/13 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #1104: November 02, 2012, 08:33:02 PM »
Thanks for the replies. :)

Offline Tyler Durden

  • Posts: 7970
  • Leprechaun
Re: 2012/13 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #1105: November 02, 2012, 08:37:13 PM »
The Angels would have been better served just giving him his $3 mil to go away.  As it stands, they save a couple million but are stuck with a $10 mil reliever who can't throw strikes.  Marmol is kind of like HRod, just paid a lot more.

Offline cmdterps44

  • Posts: 15551
  • Future
Re: 2012/13 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #1106: November 02, 2012, 08:41:48 PM »
What a crappy trade.

Offline zimm_da_kid

  • Posts: 7948
  • The one true ace
Re: 2012/13 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #1107: November 02, 2012, 08:42:49 PM »
Rizzo better have something better than Haren in mind.

Offline zimm_da_kid

  • Posts: 7948
  • The one true ace
Re: 2012/13 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #1108: November 02, 2012, 08:58:40 PM »
Quote
7:56pm: Alden Gonzalez of MLB.com (via Twitter) hears that the deal has not been completed and the Angels are still active in discussions with more than one team.

already some offseason drama going on.

Offline Vega

  • Posts: 5516
  • Party’s Over
Re: 2012/13 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #1109: November 02, 2012, 09:03:27 PM »
Offer H-Rod for Haren. :D

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 63366
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: 2012/13 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #1110: November 02, 2012, 09:11:11 PM »
Hamilton asked for 7/175

Online JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 40003
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: 2012/13 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #1111: November 02, 2012, 09:14:29 PM »
5/125 might be reasonable. 

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 63366
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: 2012/13 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #1112: November 02, 2012, 09:30:00 PM »
He'll get it

Offline BigMeech

  • Posts: 3739
Re: 2012/13 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #1113: November 02, 2012, 09:34:01 PM »
If Rizzo isn't looking at GRIENKE then fire him.

Offline BigMeech

  • Posts: 3739
Re: 2012/13 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #1114: November 02, 2012, 09:35:50 PM »
And by look at him, I don't want just the kind of passing glance you give a somewhat attractive woman on the street.  I want a nice, long, seductive stare.

Offline cmdterps44

  • Posts: 15551
  • Future
Re: 2012/13 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #1115: November 02, 2012, 09:36:52 PM »
you can look but you can't touch

Offline BigMeech

  • Posts: 3739
Re: 2012/13 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #1116: November 02, 2012, 09:38:37 PM »
#GropeGreinke

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 63366
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: 2012/13 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #1117: November 02, 2012, 09:41:51 PM »
Halos are getting Grienke. Then their failure will be complete

Offline BigMeech

  • Posts: 3739
Re: 2012/13 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #1118: November 02, 2012, 09:44:02 PM »
Nobody thought the Phillies were getting Cliff Lee in 2010 IIRC.  Came as a surprise to most.

Give Rizzo a blank check.  Let him flourish.

#GropeGreinke

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 63366
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: 2012/13 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #1119: November 02, 2012, 09:44:53 PM »
Psh .... Grienke will have a nervous breakdown

Online JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 40003
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: 2012/13 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #1120: November 02, 2012, 09:46:38 PM »
Psh .... Grienke will have a nervous breakdown

but we'd have a nervous breakdown if H-Rod pitches, so if we release him, the Force is in balance.

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: 2012/13 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #1121: November 02, 2012, 09:49:13 PM »
Hamilton asked for 7/175

Imagine how much booze, coke, meth and very average looking women you can buy with $175,000,000!!!

Offline Tyler Durden

  • Posts: 7970
  • Leprechaun
Re: 2012/13 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #1122: November 02, 2012, 09:57:40 PM »
Nats did not make a qualifying offer to Jackson - that's weird.  Did he tell them that he would accept the QO?

Offline KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 16260
  • pissy DC sports fan
Re: 2012/13 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #1123: November 02, 2012, 10:07:56 PM »
I hope the Dodgers sign Greinke and it bankrupts them so bad that Stan Kasten has to drink malt liquor out of a ditch in Modesto.

Offline Vega

  • Posts: 5516
  • Party’s Over
Re: 2012/13 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #1124: November 02, 2012, 10:26:52 PM »
Haren to Cubs not happening according to MLBTR.