Author Topic: Worst offensive performance in Nationals history - 2013 edition  (Read 9753 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Optics

  • Posts: 9233
Based loaded, no outs, none of them score.

Yeah that was some pretty inept hitting. I'll excuse Zuk, he got worked, but Shark sat on a 2-0 fastball dead red and Span swung at some junk early in the count as well.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
This one may be the leader in the clubhouse.

Offline Optics

  • Posts: 9233
Yeah there isn't much bigger fail than grounding into a double play when you're up 3-0 in the count and the pitcher has thrown 7 Balls in a row.

Offline BerkeleyNat

  • Posts: 5026
This one may be the leader in the clubhouse.

It's a contender. Piss poor effort today. That includes the manager as well.

Online HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21643
The fact that we only lost by two,  and got dominated by scrubs makes it the leader to me

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
It's a contender. Piss poor effort today. That includes the manager as well.

Definitely the manager should be included. But it should be noted that having the green light doesn't mean you have to freaking swing at a pitch that was not in his wheelhouse. Especially with two aboard and down by two late in the game when the pitcher has struggled to find the strikezone.

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236

Offline PowerBoater69

  • Posts: 14293
    • Twitter
Seven runs allowed in three games and we go 0-3.  And now we've got the flower and Mr. Clean pitching the next two games.  If we can't win with Zimnn and Detwiler on the mound we might as well pack it in.  That #1 pick Rizzo gave up is looking pretty good right now.

Online sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
This is definitely it. Unquestionably.

Offline wpa2629

  • Posts: 17048
  • No Trade Clause
For freak's sake

this crap is getting seriously tiresome


I'm too happy abooot the Caps to be pissed at the Nats


But for freak's sakes - get your crap together




Offline Mathguy

  • Posts: 9162
  • Floyd - Truely Man's best Friend
    • Outer Banks Beach House
Maybe they should play Lombo at either 2nd or 3rd and bat 2nd.  Let Werth bat 5th

Offline mmzznnxx

  • Posts: 11912
  • lol Nats
I'm too happy abooot the Caps to be pissed at the Nats

Don't worry the Caps also have a knack for disappointing.

Online imref

  • Posts: 43137
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
predicting tomorrow's line-up:

1. Span CF
2. Lombo 2B
3. Harper LF
4. Moore 1B
5. Desmond SS
6. Werth RF
7. Rendon 3B
8. Ramos C
9. Strasburg

Offline PowerBoater69

  • Posts: 14293
    • Twitter
Quote from: @Cardinals
Cardinals go for history tomorrow.  Have not swept the Nationals/Expos in a three-game road series since Sept. 26-28, 1969 in Montreal.

Offline RobDibblesGhost

  • Posts: 31455
predicting tomorrow's line-up:

1. Span CF
2. Lombo 2B
3. Harper LF
4. Moore 1B
5. Desmond SS
6. Werth RF
7. Rendon 3B
8. Ramos C
9. Strasburg

I like it, but I don't think we'll be seeing Ramos...

Online imref

  • Posts: 43137
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
I like it, but I don't think we'll be seeing Ramos...

maybe bat suzuki leadoff then?

Offline RobDibblesGhost

  • Posts: 31455
Isn't Ramos still on the DL?  We'll probably see Solano tomorrow.

Offline MorseTheHorse

  • Posts: 3172
predicting tomorrow's line-up:

1. Span CF
2. Lombo 2B
3. Harper LF
4. Moore 1B
5. Desmond SS
6. Werth RF
7. Rendon 3B
8. Ramos C
9. Strasburg

I like it.  I wouldn't mind seeing Bernie instead of Werth too.  Werth isn't playing badly, but he could sit a game for that 3-0 DP in New York.  And I like the idea of almost all the bench guys playing. 

Offline wpa2629

  • Posts: 17048
  • No Trade Clause
Day game ?

I would play all the bench guys - get some juices flowing

Online imref

  • Posts: 43137
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Isn't Ramos still on the DL?  We'll probably see Solano tomorrow.

yep.  IIRC solano hit pretty well last year.

Offline geneticlyperfct

  • Posts: 142
Moore at 1st. Espinosa at 2nd. According to Davey on the Junkies this morning.

Online JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 39996
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
I never dreamed that Espinosa would become a less effective hitter if he cut his K rate, but his groundball rate has jumped and a fair number of them are weak ones.  His BABIP is freaky low, by 100 points off his worst full season, but given the number of weak ground balls, I'm not sure it isn't deserved. 

I plan on doing a more detailed look at the counts he is getting into, but I'm going to guess that the only way a guy with a low contact rate cuts down his Ks is by taking fewer pitches early.  Also, I'd like to know if low contact rate guys have BABIP declines that correlate to K rate declines (the inference being that by being more aggressive and going less deep in counts, the extra swings generate more weak balls in play).

It may be the case that by shortening the swing and being more aggressive, he's robbed himself (with Davey's help) of his power tool.  I say this knowing his XBH% is high, but my sense is almost anything other than an extra base hit is a weak tapper.

Anyone who knows the numbers have some thoughts?

Offline Terps and Nats

  • Posts: 562
  • Wake me when the Braves series is over
Moore at 1st. Espinosa at 2nd. According to Davey on the Junkies this morning.

Does Espy have some sort of blackmail on Davey?  What does Lombo have to do to earn a start?

Offline Cinqo de Mayo

  • Posts: 432
... Shark sat on a 2-0 fastball dead red....
"Shark"? Barely a guppy.

Online sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Nationals PR ‏@NationalsPR 44s
Today's #Nationals lineup vs. STL - Span 8, Werth 9, Harper 7, Moore 3, Desmond 6, Espinosa 4, Rendon 5, Solano 2, Strasburg 1.