September 02, 2010, 09:37:03 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Tim Dierkes says, trade 'em all  (Read 2066 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
houston-nat

Offline Offline

Posts: 6861


Kenny, I'm gonna give ya an offer I can't accept




Ignore
« on: March 11, 2010, 04:46:40 PM »

His offseason report card was not very positive.

Quote
I understand $20-30MM spent on short-term free agent acquisitions won't set the franchises back in the rebuilding process much.  But if the goal is mainly veteran respectability, couldn't it have been done at half the price?

In particular I am not a fan of the $21MM the Nationals committed to Marquis and Pudge over the next two years.  They're mediocre players who don't figure to bring much back in trades or draft picks.  The Nats could've gotten similar mentoring from, say, Doug Davis and Yorvit Torrealba for one year and $6.5MM total....

On the other hand, the signings of Capps, Wang, and Kennedy are sensible.  The guarantees were minimal, and these players are more likely to have trade value.  Plus, the arbitration-eligibility of Capps and Wang for 2011 essentially serves as a club option....

If we eliminated the top two from the Major League Signings ledger, I'd say GM Mike Rizzo had a solid offseason.  However, I'm not sure what the plan is here: the Nationals have Keith Law's #23-ranked farm system and should probably launch a full-blown rebuild, but they're adding relatively pricey free agents.

In his chat today, I asked him to provide an alternative plan:

Quote
[Comment From Brian]
You suggested today that the Nationals should burn the whole thing down and do a full rebuild. If you're Mike Rizzo, who would you NOT trade/cut/generally get rid of at some point this season?

Shorter list is who I would...Dunn, Marquis, Willingham, Capps, Pudge, Bruney, Harris, Kennedy, some of those happening midseason. I would rather see the Indians approach of accepting some pain but restocking.

Accepting pain but restocking? I don't know ... we could definitely get some moderately valuable prospects in return for Dunn, Willingham and maybe Kennedy and Capps, but is that enough to justify a half-season of having Josh Whitesell, Wil Nieves and Justin Maxwell starting every day, plus the rushing of Espinosa, Storen, and Strasburg?

BTW he at least said to build around the Zimmerman(n)s.
Logged
DPMOmaha

Offline Offline

Posts: 8134


Midwest Correspondant




Ignore
« Reply #1 on: March 11, 2010, 04:49:48 PM »

He's hated the Nats plan all offseason. 
Logged
Nathan

Offline Offline

Posts: 3788


I has a sad :'(




Ignore
« Reply #2 on: March 11, 2010, 04:57:12 PM »

I just don't get it.  The Nats' FO doesn't spend money in the offseason and the ownership is cheap.  They spend money and they're stupid.  The Nationals are just a horse for the sports media to bash on no matter what.
Logged
Evolution33

Offline Offline

Posts: 2516





Ignore
« Reply #3 on: March 11, 2010, 04:59:22 PM »

I don't care what any of these people say. Half of them follow the Boswell line that the payroll is too low and then the other have bash the Nats because the payroll is too much. I have to say right now that Pudge deal looks genuis. So what if they paid $6 million in baseball salary for a name player that is the same as $0.20.
Logged
LetsGoNats

Offline Offline

Posts: 1585


We're Nat Gonna Take It!


WWW

Ignore
« Reply #4 on: March 11, 2010, 05:21:30 PM »

Interesting that he cites Cleveland as tearing it down & rebuilding the right way.  They certainly have the right manager to sit there like a bump on a log in the face of absolute FAILure.
Logged
natsfan4evr

Offline Offline

Posts: 4817




Ignore
« Reply #5 on: March 11, 2010, 05:28:57 PM »

It's time to put up or shut up. The media will not stop until this team proves them otherwise. The team has been in the cellar for the last 2 seasons...do they really deserve respect? Respect is earned
Logged
Evolution33

Offline Offline

Posts: 2516





Ignore
« Reply #6 on: March 11, 2010, 05:47:01 PM »

Interesting that he cites Cleveland as tearing it down & rebuilding the right way.  They certainly have the right manager to sit there like a bump on a log in the face of absolute FAILure.

They lost 97 games last season. I don't see much difference between the right way and the wrong way.
Logged
blue911

Offline Offline

Posts: 9269





Ignore
« Reply #7 on: March 11, 2010, 05:51:46 PM »

I remember the Indians being flamed for not getting more for Cliff Lee and Victor Martinez. How can bad trades make your team better?
Logged
PANatsFan

Offline Offline

Posts: 21735


That's a huuuuuge pitch!




Ignore
« Reply #8 on: March 11, 2010, 05:53:33 PM »

He's just a guy. 1 man's opinion, nothing more, nothing less. I guess he knows a lot about fantasy ball. Not so much about instruction to the sinkerballers from Wang and Marquis.

Upon further contemplation, who cares. Those are not type A's. Would Davis or Torrealba be any better? It has zero to do with rebuilding the system, they drafted with little regard to signability.
Logged
PowerBoater69

Offline Offline

Posts: 830




Ignore
« Reply #9 on: March 11, 2010, 06:03:44 PM »

The Nats' FO doesn't spend money in the offseason and the ownership is cheap.  They spend money and they're stupid.

How much will the opening day payroll rise from 2009 to 2010?
Logged
The Chief

Offline Offline

Posts: 19606


I happen to like trash


WWW
« Reply #10 on: March 11, 2010, 06:10:08 PM »

What's Dierkes' track record on the Nats?  Isn't he one of the guys who pretty much always trashes us?
Logged
JMW4th

Offline Offline

Posts: 14219


Sarcastically, I'm in charge.


WWW

Ignore
« Reply #11 on: March 11, 2010, 06:12:17 PM »

tim dierkes is not a baseball "expert" at all. he just runs a site that tells people what all the beat writers say.
Logged
PANatsFan

Offline Offline

Posts: 21735


That's a huuuuuge pitch!




Ignore
« Reply #12 on: March 11, 2010, 06:14:15 PM »

tim dierkes is not a baseball "expert" at all. he just runs a site that tells people what all the beat writers say.

To be fair, he also used the site to sell his condo.
Logged
JMW4th

Offline Offline

Posts: 14219


Sarcastically, I'm in charge.


WWW

Ignore
« Reply #13 on: March 11, 2010, 06:14:43 PM »

I love mlbtr for what it does, but Dierkes' personal opinion on baseball matters really means absolutely nothing, imo.
Logged
The Chief

Offline Offline

Posts: 19606


I happen to like trash


WWW
« Reply #14 on: March 11, 2010, 06:16:31 PM »

Not who I was thinking of at all then.  Getting mixed up with Kurkijan.
Logged
Nathan

Offline Offline

Posts: 3788


I has a sad :'(




Ignore
« Reply #15 on: March 11, 2010, 06:39:32 PM »

Not who I was thinking of at all then.  Getting mixed up with Kurkijan.
QFT.  I thought this was someone that mattered.  Screw Tim Dierkes.
Logged
PANatsFan

Offline Offline

Posts: 21735


That's a huuuuuge pitch!




Ignore
« Reply #16 on: March 11, 2010, 07:12:46 PM »

Not who I was thinking of at all then.  Getting mixed up with Kurkijan.

lmao They are like Einstein and Forrest Gump.
Logged
PatsNats28

Offline Offline

Posts: 5678


New team mascot!




Ignore
« Reply #17 on: March 11, 2010, 07:28:04 PM »

I think Rizzo's plan was a good one...

Speaking of Acta, we were doing catalysts in chem today and when we talked about activation energy, I wrote it down in my notes as ACTAvation Energy Smiley
Logged
imref

Offline Offline

Posts: 2774





Ignore
« Reply #18 on: March 11, 2010, 09:55:27 PM »

i'm a lot more excited about 2011 then I am about this season, if all goes to plan we've got a front 3 of Strasburg, Zimmermann, and Lannan, with Storen in the closer spot, Desmond entrenched at short, Norris catching, and hopefully Dunn locked up.  Add a quality OF and that's a team that could at least chase a wild card spot if everyone is healthy.

And then you've got that kid from Vegas potentially as a September call-up.  :-)
Logged
KnorrForYourMoney

Offline Offline

Posts: 9462


^treated for nauseau by Nats trainers




Ignore
« Reply #19 on: March 11, 2010, 10:04:10 PM »

lmao They are like Einstein and Forrest Gump.
lmao Yeah, the guy's a real simpleton.  I mean he's not high on the NATS!  How could you not want to sing the praises of such a great franchise?

I wonder if Pirates fans have been saying the same thing for the past ten years about writers who trash them. Undecided

The fault of the Nats wasn't spending too much on free agents, it was spending on guys who aren't going to get them out of suck territory.
Logged
PANatsFan

Offline Offline

Posts: 21735


That's a huuuuuge pitch!




Ignore
« Reply #20 on: March 11, 2010, 10:25:25 PM »

lmao Yeah, the guy's a real simpleton.  I mean he's not high on the NATS! 

Tim Kurkjian is a Hall of Fame voter and really respected baseball reporter with tons of connections. KnorrForYourMoney argues with straw men.
Logged
KnorrForYourMoney

Offline Offline

Posts: 9462


^treated for nauseau by Nats trainers




Ignore
« Reply #21 on: March 11, 2010, 10:50:38 PM »

Forrest Gump comparisons are normally so flattering!
Logged
DPMOmaha

Offline Offline

Posts: 8134


Midwest Correspondant




Ignore
« Reply #22 on: March 11, 2010, 11:14:11 PM »

i'm a lot more excited about 2011 then I am about this season, if all goes to plan we've got a front 3 of Strasburg, Zimmermann, and Lannan, with Storen in the closer spot...
Actually, if all goes according to plan, you've got Wang, Stras, Zmann, Lannan and Detwiler/Marquis as your rotation.
Logged
PANatsFan

Offline Offline

Posts: 21735


That's a huuuuuge pitch!




Ignore
« Reply #23 on: March 11, 2010, 11:23:04 PM »

Detwiler/Marquis

You realize how amazing that is? The current 2nd best pitcher fighting for a 5th starter spot.
Logged
DPMOmaha

Offline Offline

Posts: 8134


Midwest Correspondant




Ignore
« Reply #24 on: March 11, 2010, 11:24:43 PM »

You realize how amazing that is? The current 2nd best pitcher fighting for a 5th starter spot.
Yeah, it's be pretty cool.  But we actually have to get Wang and Zmann back to that level before we can wag our tongues at it.  The potential's there though.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.10 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.141 seconds with 17 queries.